Member Info for Piltick

�5k or �10k...

Whether its little or muckle, it shows the Directors have confidence in the tech and the company. If they didn't, they wouldn't throw away �k or �10k of their own money.

Most seem to be buys, yet the SP stays stuck. ?

It is the responsibility of the shareholder to advise the company when there is any significant reportable change.

I thought that the waste plastic sent to China was supposed to be already sorted and 'clean' for recycling. So surely that process would have to be done in any case.

I have never understood why some computer manufacturers make keyboards with no buttons for full stops.

I find it hard to believe that the sudden rise today is because of KA buying shares. In any case, it has just brought the SP back roughly to where it was immediately after the last placing.

Dolphin, why do you say that wazzza is a Chartered Financial Planner? Where did you get that from?

It is always useful to take a look at the actions of those who have more detailed knowledge than ourselves: - KA takes the trouble to move from US to UK. He must be confident before he does that, I'm sure it's not just because he doesn't like Trump. - KA buys shares. He must expect something good to come out of this otherwise he'd keep his money in his piggy bank. - Wrightbus signs a MOU. OK, so it's not a binding contract, but it does show that they have confidence in the product and the company, and they will have looked into the technology and the prototype unit in quite a lot of detail.

Thing is, gustavio, although a MOU is not the same as a binding contract (and I think most people on here are aware of that) it is at least an indication that a large organisation such as Wrightbus has done a due diligence at some level and that they have confidence in what they have found. Otherwise I'm quite sure they wouldn't have been prepared to sign a MOU. This in turn should give some level of assurance to us little people as Wrightbus will have had access to much more detail than we have.

I wonder how many stop losses have been triggered this morning.

Master, if you have something to say then substantiate it with evidence or logical argument. Anyone can sling wild un-supported comments around. Posters on these BBs should be held accountable for what they write instead of hiding behind anonymity.

You may be right about TP, but to say that the system doesn't work is utter rubbish and you should not be allowed to spout misleading rubbish like that. The prototype does work and has been proved to work and was seen working by over 100 people during the demo days last year.

This has gone beyond stupid.

Yes he did Bumble. It was during his interview on Vox on 15th January when he said: We�re going to be demonstrating this up in our Thornton unit dedicating the last part of January and the entire month of February exclusively to data acquisition around various make-ups of the plastic waste stream that will finalise the information that we will need for the manufacturing of our high temperature gasifier.

I think he's gone again.

Who told you it has only run for a couple of weeks? Rubbish. Have you considered what several people including KA has told you that the greatest stress on the system comes with frequent powering up and powering down? And they've done that as well. But you keep ignoring that point because it suits you to ignore it.

antelope: ' What on earth are they doing every day?' If you read through the RNSs and watch/listen to KA's interviews you will find that they have spent their days running a variety of tests on different feedstocks, accumulating data from the prototype that is being fed into the computer system and being used in the design of the commercial G3 unit.

I wouldn't disagree with you there ross, I just get fed up with some posters banging on about something that isn't the critical issue. Clearly some only see or hear what they want to see or hear. I'm not saying that the prototype has been fully tested and proven because I don't know for sure, but for posters to claim that it hasn't been run for long enough is just nonsense. It is a fair question but more importantly they should be asking about the frequency of powering up and down. Don't ask the other users of this BB though, ask the company.

It has been stated by KA and also on here that the greatest stress on the system comes when it is powered up and down frequently in a short space of time, not when it is running constantly. And that test has been done . So to keep asking whether the system has been run constantly for a long period is not addressing the critical question, which is how does it preform when it is powered up and powered down many times with short runs. And that question has been answered.