RE: Suspension of trading27 Nov 2018 21:09
Ironic:
The example you give would involve collusion and an audit trail, and a real risk therefore of Sir Richard being found out and prosecuted (and of losing his title!). However, Sir R doesn't need to protect himself if the allegation isn't true, because in that event there wouldn't be for example any evidence of a payment from Sir R to the person allegedly buying the shares on his behalf.
This Flybe bid situation is no different in principle from the run up to a regular results announcement where the BOD are privy to price-sensitive information - which likewise is not a "normal everyday situation", but shares are nevertheless not routinely suspended in those circumstances. Anyone involved must not deal of course, and must not leak. The "protection", ie what stops that happening, is the risk of prosecution for what is a serious criminal offence.
Despite that, leaks do occur from time to time, and in that event suspension would be appropriate. However, there is no suggestion that a leak has occurred during the Flybe takeover talks, hence no reason for a suspension.