RE: Bio International14 Jun 2025 16:18
Hi HBD
I don’t dispute your analogy, but, I do now have a problem with how the BoD “sell” Sareum - my understanding was when TM stood down SP would drive the company forward, however, it seems to me there’s no drive to “develop” and SP needs such to “deal”.
Get we should have a plan B, but, seems TM is still dictating the “pace” of Sareum’s development which given my personal experience of his “belief” as to what shareholder’s need to know (disclosures at AGM’s of MHRA and of SRA737 data return) bothers me!
I find TM more of a concern than SP currently, simply because we don’t know his remit as a BoD member, and given if Sareum had something to say that is new, it would have been RNS’d to the market aka it’s shareholders not an invitation to some LinkedIn “buddies” on a jolly - so what is he taking to Boston!
No doubt, others will have different opinions but I as someone who has supported the BoD to the hilt, believe they should now be doing more in PR than “appears” to be happening .
As I’ve said previously we seem to be back
“researching” more than “developing “ on a limited cash runway, a little concerning!
Presumably 2 weeks into a 16 week toxicity study, the most pivotal period in Sareum’s history and we don’t even know if the mice have turned up for registration, yes flippant, but how hard is that to confirm to the market?
Just find it all a very baffling approach to successful commercialisation both scientifically and financially, anyway …..
GLA