Member Info for Ovets

Where's that "very clear and unambiguous" statement then Godfrey?

Godfrey:
Answer: NO!

BTW, have you noticed that while the nit-wits over on ADVFN shout abuse at us over here, they can't resist coming to have a look and just like cheats in an exam, publish what's been posted here first?
Id1ots!

Don't tell Godders/Gozzie,Ralph, etc., as they won't believe it and get in a strop!

Yes Arfur and Chrysaor aren't stupid, unlike Godfrey!

Godfrey jeered at the prospect of there being a conspiracy, but I believe that's exactly what's happened and continues.

long!
where did "like" come from? - probably hoping Godfrey would change his mind!!

The UK Government has announced today that it's restarted talks with EDF about new nuclear power stations, starting in Sizewell.

As well as being extremely expensive, new nuclear power stations take a very like time to come on-stream.
You wouldn't need to contemplate such a thing if renewables could supply all our needs.

So what's going to keep the lights on and re-charge Godfrey's Tesla in the mean time?
Don't tell me oil & gas - surely not!

That's why SL IS going ahead, with or without UKEF involvement.

Godfrey, what you were asked, which you haven't answered, is "please produce the "very clear and unambiguous" statement, you refer to and who said/wrote it and when".
So, who said/wrote it, when and where (please provide quotes, otherwise you'll lose marks)?

Actually, Chrysaor probably doesn't need UKEF, but having it would be a bonus.
HMG involvement would give additional confidence to all.

BTW, WTF does smelling coffee have to do with it, other than there's an awful lot of it in Brazil?

Godders, please get on with your research like a good boy.
The one thing that's absolutely definite is that no "very clear and unambiguous" statement has been made.
In fact, it's been made deliberately obscure.

Along with completing the rest of your homework on EVs, etc., please produce the "very clear and unambiguous" statement, you refer to and who said/wrote it and when.

Anyway, isn't it past your bedtime now?

That's more-or-less what I was saying, below.

In early 2021, with vaccines being rolled-out, the confidence of spring into summer and most important of all, PoO staying above $50, then I see PMO taking their final UKEF application opportunity.

There's quite a lot of evidence in the FI that they expect SL to go ahead.

With announcements like this, how can western economies stand any chance of comparable post-COVID economic recovery, unless we postpone our carbon reduction, or cheat?

That's why I say that UKEF for SL is still a possibility. Apart from posters here and on other BBs, I haven't seen anyone else stating it's OFF.

OK, Chrysaor/PMO may not need it, but as well as a cheap(ish) loan being helpful, HMG involvement gives serious project authenticity to any other dithering participants.

I'm inclined to agree that UKEF for SL is looking less likely, but I must point out that Boris and others have been extremely evasive about committing themselves to anything definite.

Look through everything that's been said & published on the matter and I challenge anyone to find an absolutely clear statement.

I think UKEF for SL is still possible, if PMO gets on with it.
We know Boris does what he wants to do, so if UKEF has already been assigned to SL and the FI, he'll authorise it, whatever.

Godfrey, ALL shares go up and down and the clever ones do well from trading, buying low and selling high.
Those who moan all the time are unwittingly publicising that they've messed-up, probably buying high and selling low in a panic, or just watching the sp fall as they sit on their hands.

If you're such an expert, you'd better go and tell Chrysaor management what a balls-up they've made by getting involved with PMO.

Just get on with your research and you'll be a better person for knowing more.

Get on with your research Godfrey.
We'll be asking questions to check you haven't been skiving

FFS Godfrey, is your other name Eeyore?
I think that's what we'll call you from now on.

Following a question from Caroline Lucas about UKEF funding of fossil fuel projects, Boris refused to answer and say that the Government would change its policy towards funding the current 6, or so, pending applications.
He reminded everyone of the Government's policy to reduce carbon emissions, which Caroline Lucas has praised.

Well, you put it the way you want, but yes, there is a considerable degree of misinformation and if you can't see that, that probably explains why you post so much drivel.

Politicians are in a difficult place, having to get re-elected within every 5 years, so there's not much time between elections to get important things done, as we're seeing right now.
They have to say all the right environmental things, otherwise they're toast, but they've also got to keep the lights on and taxes manageable, otherwise they're toast.

Godfrey, instead of arguing about everything, why not spend that time researching what's really happening, right now:
- what happens with Green Energy certificates;
- what happens regarding the manufacture and replacement of EV batteries;
- what is needed to maintain "renewable" electricity supplies at all times;
- the true costs of manufacturing, use and maintenance of renewable energy generation equipment;
- the true cost and pollution created by every vehicle from raw materials to scrap yard;
- the current situation regarding commercial vehicles and shipping, on which we all rely to survive;
- etc.

You'll find that underlying it all continues to be a dependence on oil and gas, far greater than you appear to understand.
When you've done that research, then come back and resume your arguing.

'fraid you're wrong Godfrey - like so many, you've fallen for the publicity.
You need to look a bit deeper.

The bottom line, which you appear to have conveniently forgotten, is that oil and gas are going to be needed for some time yet and as the Big Oilers start to leave it behind, the likes of Chrysaor stand to do very well indeed.

BTW Godfrey, That's why PMO/Chrysaor stands to do so well, as they are unashamedly sweeping-up behind the Big Oils, who are committed to having to switch to new energy sources.

For a start, Godfrey, my car doesn't "guzzle" oil.
In fact it hardly uses any and it gets me round very nicely.

The "green electricity" that your Tesla consumes comprises a significant fossil fuel content and the pollution from making a Tesla is considerably more than came from making mine.
As I intend using mine until the wheels fall off, the total pollution from it will have been considerably less than your alleged "green machine" and that'll be before you've had to replace the batteries.