Member Info for OPENSPACES

Well said PR. The directors of CAP-XX anticipate securing a follow-on order for in excess of US$1.0m in the first half of 2018. The foregoing statement was issued in Aug 2017 and so far a year on and we have not had a single comment about a second order. All we ask is to be kept informed. If not investors will form their own opinions.

I am sorry if a perfectly reasonable question offends you Patch6 . I am just trying to understand why IIs are that important to companies like CPX. Indeed in certain circumstances they could be considered less than desirable. My point was CPX is on record as saying that " the company is managed in an efficient, effective and entrepreneurial manner for the benefit of all shareholders over the longer term" and therefore I would be most annoyed if privileged information is being shared with selected dhareholders.

What information would CPX be able to share with IIs (rather than individuals) and is it lawful ?
Someone once said to me that individual investors with all the info available to them are driving sports cars whereas big IIs are at the helm of a battleship requiring much more time and effort to "make changes". But in the final analysis are they taking a punt just like the rest of us?

OK you guys who have an expert knowledge of the “ongoing court cases”, I note a recent posting advising that we are now being counter sued. In a worst-case scenario what would the damages be and would they be beyond our resources to pay? Not knocking all the research done on this board but is this truly the elephant in the room regarding Cap-XX’s future? Realistically by when should the results be known?

James H . Glad you have kept details of my portfolio sent to you in confidence to quote from . Nice man

My AFC are up 30% today (no consolidation) having just announced their World's First Hydrogen Electric Vehicle Charger . Today AFC, next week CPX automotive ???

Yes I have a reference number but I am not going to give it to you as it is a matter between the FCA and myself. Having said that I think everybody on here (irrespective of whether they agree with my take on matters or not ) now understands what a rather unpleasant individual you are who seeks to utilise their obvious intellect to demean others rather encourage reasoned debate. I note you state the FCA "are still collecting information on me". If that is the case they must know who I am but I would suggest after what is it some 6/9 months of investigation they must be getting rather bored with finding nothing. Thank you PC01 for so eloquently representing the majority view.

Email rec'd from FCA TT . Spoke to them separately. Please proceed as you see fit . You will find nothing. I trust you will publish the results of your enquiries and put an end to your diatribe once and for all
Dear Sir

Thanks for contacting the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) via our webform.

In response to your matter, I understand you have concerns in how you are being perceived by individuals associated with the bulletin board on LSE, regarding CPX. Hopefully I can provide some useful information on this matter and guidance for resolving it further.

Our role and remit

We're tasked with regulating the UK financial markets as a whole and in order to do this we must remain impartial. This means we’re unable to investigate or intervene on individual cases; however the information consumers supply us with is extremely valuable as it gives us an idea of how customers are being treated and how firms operate in the market.

Although the details of this case will be logged appropriately, it does appear this is in relation to an activity we wouldn't regulate. Therefore, we won't have specific rules regarding this and we're unable to comment much further as it relates to an element which falls outside our jurisdiction.

Your next steps

It appears you have already taken the appropriate steps I would have recommended, in terms of raising the case with LSE. I would only suggest to stay in touch with them further for any updates.

I hope this information helps and if you need to speak to us further on this matter then please don't hesitate to contact us again.

Kind regards,

xxxxxxxx
Associate | Customer Contact Centre

Albert. I suspect that even you after nearly a year of false allegations would get fed up. I have spoken to the FCA who said that X person is all hot air. Then I had a detailed dialogue with Admin who suspended X person for a while but after a while lost interest. Since then he has to be fair been less persistent but as you will see recently him and others have started off with the same old XXXX. Its all a game to me . They don't like anyone who dares criticise their investment potential. I for my part have seen it all before and realise that most BODs let you down. Happy days

Albert . My real name is known on this board. It came about when James H goaded me into sending him proof that I owned 1.3million shares. He then chose against all LSE rules to extrapolate my name from my E mail address and name me. The issue here is that a contrary opinion to the endless ramping is met by an accusation that I am a paid troll (usually Peel) . A supposed application to the FCA has fallen as has every attempt to discredit me and others. Despite a previous temporary suspension Tech Tom continues to lead the campaign that any dissenters are using duplicate accounts and are paid to discourage positive sentiment. For my part I am individual who wishes simply wishes to posts my own views. I will not give into people who seek to deny me that right.

As always avoid the point and deflect the argument

While I realise that anything I post now will be taken down within 5 mins as the pressing the report button more than x number of times generates a removal I say to Tech Tom that your remarks are libellous. So I give notice to you now please show your proof or withdrawal your remarks

As AW once said GPUAR. You always choose to make things personal. there is no point in us communicating.

Only one small problem IWGROD its 12000 miles away. Of course I am needy the SP has halved recently. Obviously you are not concerned and that's fine but please allow me my emotions

From CPX web site
The underlying principle of the QCA Code is that “the purpose of good corporate governance is to ensure that the company is managed in an efficient, effective and entrepreneurial manner for the benefit of all shareholders over the longer term”.
The Board regards regular communications with shareholders as one of its key responsibilities. CAP-XX is committed to engaging with shareholders and this effort is led by the Chief Executive Officer.
In order to gauge shareholder sentiment, CAP-XX meets with key institutional shareholders typically every six months and when necessary solicits feedback from its larger shareholders via its broker. CAP-XX welcomes shareholder contact at any time and communications should be sent in the first instance to mailto:investor.relations@cap-xx.com

CAP-XX holds an open Q&A session at every Annual General Meeting and attends investor events to engage with retail shareholders.
This communication allows the CAP-XX board to understand the shareholder’s views and to ensure that the strategies and objectives of the Company are aligned with shareholders. In its decision-making, the Board will have regard to the ascertained expectations and needs of its shareholders (as appropriate and in accordance with its statutory and fiduciary duties).
The Board believes the Company’s mode of engaging with shareholders is adequate and effective.

That's fair enough Surprised but where in the daily equation does the "but it is the shareholders who own the company and pay my wages" consideration sit. I would concur it is not the only consideration but it should be an important one and certainly a KPI. The vehicle for communicating on issues is an RNS which are noticeably absent of late. There are those who are appeased by their own technical research whereas others need regular communication. I am fall into the latter group

You are absolutely right hindsight is a wonderful thing, But shares are a bit like football i.e. if the results don't go the way you want you look for someone to blame. All I do is to look at his record and am now beginning to wonder whether he is as good as he has been made out to be. Sure he talks the talk about all the techy bit but in terms of growing the company into profit he is less impressive. IMHO he must deliver this year or else a review is needed. It may well all come good but the silence is deafening. I just raise the possibility that AKs (and BOD's collectively) most important aim is not solely the SP.

Everybody has an exit strategy I have mine and I am sure AK has his, but I would suggest AK has more influence over his than I have over mine

I am not suggesting for one minute that AK would do such a thing but I have experienced take overs before where a low acceptance price is recommended and part of the deal is that certain individuals will get consultancy posts in the new company. I suggest that a confirmed order book would certainly make a company far more value, hence the concern with the lack of any news

Or they could make a very attractive offer to AK personally . Everybody has their price.