Member Info for OneDayRodney1

Can't see any Twitter account in that name?

Where on Twitter is Wshak saying he wants to buy FRR shares?

mapp: Halifax are a Bank. They're owned by Bank of Scotland, who are part of Lloyds Bank. It is the Building Societies that are more likely to keep branches open ... but many of them don't have banking facilities.

Good morning all
We have recently had some posters saying that the Company had started issuing share certs again, which seemed a positive sign. Yesterday Tsbs shared that HSBC had told him that they had stopped issuing them. Can someone confirm
please that certs have been issued by the Company in recent weeks?

Ok Ricardo, you are forgiven ;) ... unless you towed a fooking caravan to and from the site. My pet hate ;)!

Sonny: indeed. Issued shares total 15,760,835,403 so just over a £1 a share. But since it was a completely made up figure it is meaningless (alas!).

johnnybbad: I am confident that delisted shares cannot be held in an ISA so if they're still there they shouldn't be ...

So this is what the board has been reduced to this morning:
an idiotic annoying post falsely claiming a BP takeover and lots of green lines from the filtered imbecile.
One can understand why so many posters aren't bothering until there is proper news.
Moreover it is bl**dy sweltering in this office.

johnnybbad: you promised to host the party first ;)!

Ricardo: with respect maybe look a bit harder. It's all there in postings over the weekend.

Jekyll: I'm assuming this is just another annoying pointless post.

On the basis of what we have seen so far Hope is winning in the courts and so has little incentive to go for an oocs. If it got to a jury trial then the sands may shift as whilst the judge is clearly on his side, Hope may be worried that a jury will be swayed by the history and the type of person he is and all the emotional 'Hope stopping Frontera trying to do the best for the Georgian people' stuff and actually come down on our side.
GLA

RR: you're right, there are the resident pessimists.
Then there is you!
Maybe the best place is somewhere in-between the two extremes.
GLA

Do we get the environment protection through not doing any drilling ... ;)?

Kenirogas: agree re Shatner. I have met him. He isn't a mischief maker and has always contributed well to this board with facts as opposed to speculation.
GLA

Phil: please correct me if I am wrong but I thought someone posted that we are allocated a 10 minute hearing on the 1 August. If so, it won't be the end, maybe a trial date will be set afterwards?

Guys: it's 'desserts' ... just or unjust!
Aarrgghh!

Coggy: many thanks for sharing your take on Zaza's character. It certainly helps to read that from someone who has spent considerably longer in his company than the rest of us.

Good afternoon all
Given the bad news that has emanated over the past 48 hours, we have all become understandably even more frustrated that Zaza hasn't updated us on any news. This frustration is augmented as YJ seem to be receiving the cold shoulder too. We also know that FSHG have been stonewalled, which is derogatory, especially given they represent 28% of the shareholders of Frontera.
So why is Zaza behaving like this?
I have been reflecting on my dealings with him. Having spoken to him I formed a positive impression, and that fact, coupled with his openness and approachability, was a factor in increasing my personal investment to a massive amount for me. However, there were always a couple of anomalies. One was at the 25 January shareholder meeting when, during the open question and answer session, I asked him if he regretted his promise of no fundraising only to go to the market a few weeks later for funds. His answer was an emphatic 'no'. So humility is something alien to him.
The treatment of us shareholders since Christmas has led me to conclude the following about him. He appears a driven man and seems to want success at almost all costs. Accordingly I think he only does things when he thinks he will benefit from them. So the shareholder presentations were purely an attempt to sustain the share price to help raise capital. Currently he doesn't need us shareholders to be onside so he is ignoring us. His focus is winning against Hope and my fear is that his arrogance might mean that he doesn't make the correct decision to chuck it in when he (as far as we can see) appears to be losing. This is proving a distraction for sure. But this win at all costs attitude may also turn out to be our saviour as he will want a huge return on his massive shareholding and, if that happens, then we benefit too.
The four who went to Georgia will have a better knowledge of the man than any of us; it would be interesting (given we have sweet fa otherwise to go on) to hear what they think about his motives/behaviour.
JMO

Thanks Tsbs. Hope you get a reply.