Member Info for OneDayRodney1

Indeed Sycric. Maybe you could do the door and ensure that baggage1 isn't let in without his/her share certificate ;)?

Keysersoze: ZZ owns 1.04bn shares and Steve 1.71bn. So together they own 2.75bn. Issued shares are 15.761bn, so together they own 17.45% of the Company.

The writ seems to have a few different dates on it, the latest seemingly being the 28(rd?!?) Which is a Sunday. That seems to suggest they meant the 23rd. Anyway Zaza and SN have 14 days to settle or respond. If this is from the 28th then the latest it could be is tomorrow. So there may be something posted at the Court imminently ...

Agreed Mills. Moreover they were trying to stop FRR being sued and so trying to protect the Company. So another positive aspect to it.

Cheers pophead. The link (below) was posted by StarRage.
It says that the debt was accrued in October to December and that the personal guarantee was given in February 2019 in response to the debt being chased and not paid, which suggests that the debt isn't disputed. It doesn't appear to state when the 20% interest was agreed to but that is pretty much an irrelevance given the above.

https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ak7gVwQ3mttllmVNZ_QOn6o6aIf5?e=cnwefQ

R8/Arsenal: I can't remember who posted the Maples summons detail from the Cayman's Court on here so can't find it alas...

Or am I misreading that? Maybe it could start before then?

Timster: from the court papers 26 July:

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER
4810-5805-3789v.4
The scope of anticipated discovery will extend to the matters alleged in the
First Amended Verified Complaint and related defenses, as well as affirmative
defenses, asserted in Defendants’ Answer, and any matter reasonably related
thereto or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
The parties have not proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery
rules.
The parties have discussed and considered entering into a stipulated ediscovery order, but at this point in time have not agreed on the terms of such a
potential order.
The proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) is as follows:
(a) following initial disclosures, the parties will mutually engage in written and
document discovery; (b) following initial exchanges of documents the parties will
meet and confer to determine what, if any, e-discovery may be required; (c) upon
completion of written, document, and e-discovery, the parties will conduct
depositions, commencing in early 2020; (d) fact discovery will cut-off on March
31, 2020; (e) expert discovery to be completed by May 15, 2020.
There are no identified discovery disputes at present.

So not until the start of next year ...alas!

Whilst none of us know for sure, agreeing a 20% interest on the debt and then giving a personal guarantee, doesn't suggest that Zaza and SN are disputing the Maples bill, as Symore surmises. It suggests they have (or had) no money.

Yep fg. Am going on Saturday. Weather forecast is **** though ...

A number of us reported the cancelled trades to the FCA at the time they were happening and they did sweet F A.
A completely ineffective waste of money organisation imo.

And perhaps to frighten the Ukraine Govt ... they won't want a trade war!

R8: if it is quashed with facts then, whilst that would be disappointing, I would rather know than be living in cloud cuckoo land with false hope tbh.

Timster: it could be that they are unable to disclose what has happened in Georgia for NDA reasons and it being price sensitive for other parties. Could be a whole host of reasons it has to be kept under wraps for the moment.

Puddy: I clearly was mistaken about your intentions; I apologise.
Yes, it would be great if you could get some more information, or even some more confirmation that what you have been told is true.

Puddy: the one yesterday at 20:10... I thought you were pulling our plonkers!

If they have moved to Moldova then they would not have been able to do so without funding. Which would suggest, as Regdik surmises, a sale or JV. The other possibility is that Hope has got it but I think this can be discounted as it isn't permitted under the terms of the agreement. If it is lost then where has the funding come from? They would not get a loan as their asset is lost. So if this rumour is true then it seems it should be very good news...

Free: having met him, I know Puddy is one of us!

Zib: thanks. It does, however, sound far-fetched and begs hundreds of questions ...

Puddy: your post was not funny imo.
And it has 18 tick ups so presumably many thought you were being serious ..