Member Info for Olderwiser

I see the problem now MMO thinks 5 = everybody

MMO, in order to state that, have you consulted everybody first, I think not

Our board, I think not

Shareguru22 did encourage me to come here

HSG

?????

MMO

In 88e zero

Mysticmaco

This is incorrect there have been times when RNSs have been timed for the UK market, so it gets first bite

Gemstar, 10:09

You are being a bit naughty, I have posted directly to your question, that I am very comfortable with my PANR results. So am in fact experiencing happiness over this, as I am sure you would in the same situation

Will you be persisting with this disinformation campaign ?

Handspringguy 10:08

There was clear confusion, over flaring, as copied from triump1 post below, and Musk15 then thanking him for clearing that up

"We also saw a document ftom the state of alaska posted by another member stating restrictions on flaring for longer than an hour (except for pilot light and emergencies). To purposely flare excess gas for long periods of time is illegal except for emergencies in the state of alaska."

Re rigs, there are no restricted flare rigs, the flare is a safety critical system, what is required is event notification if unplanned or unpermitted flaring occurs

Trojan.

Being a market follower, is no advantage. Then you are caught with or without shares at critical times

MadEnglish

Should I not have answered Gemstars question, I though it only fair to advise, I am not coming from a point of bitterness, as the question had assumed my motivation was losses, which somehow had triggered an emotive response.

Yes I have called every failure correctly, and that is at risk this time on the USFS, Although it is a combination of industry experience and what is in or out of the RNS, correctly understanding the RNS is vital

As to wealth, I am OK and in a position to give, it is not rare for people to donate time, to things of interest to them

Tell us Gemstar, do you think it is better for investors to be misinformed, believing things to be true, that in provable fact are false

EG Flaring is illegal in a permitted flow test

Does it help them to think flaring is not allowed, so no sign of a flare is normal

That using the words "look forward to" and" are pleased" makes a difference to what can be expected, when they are template wording, like Dear Sir

Buyers of oil explorers prefer to bid on the more expensive oil at Hickory, than the better, cheaper, greater scale stuff next door

Gemstar

I will repost my answer to Gemstar2 on H/copper, he/she asked the same question, I assumed that was also you

I am doing very nicely thanks, as I had the background to know the short attack was a fabrication, so loaded up heavily in the 10p range, and of course also in the capital raise at 17p

But don't you think this should be discussed back on the PANR LSE site

Exactly right Galicia

Case in point for the doubters, just 1 week later it is a fail

Managing Director, Ashley Gilbert, commented: "we look forward"

“The results to date from the Merlin-2 well are encouraging. Initial indications are that all three target

reservoirs in the Merlin-2 well were penetrated, demonstrated elevated gas readings, and observation

of cuttings samples have revealed oil shows over the target intervals. We look forward to results from

the pending wireline program, which is set to be conducted over the next 7 to 10 days. Following

completion of this program, we hope to be able to confirm the presence of mobile hydrocarbons, and a

discovery, at Merlin-2.”

https://clients3.weblink.com.au/pdf/88E/02501901.pdf

Good one MysticmacO, refocus on tearing one of those relative value posts Scot126 has contributed, if you can

I think he has been far to generous in the number of potential barrels for 88e, but its a starting point

My own assessment is much harsher given the decline from 341mmbo to 28mmbo plus 57mmb of NGLs in the post drill estimates for the BFF

MysticmacO

Will you also be taking the chance to sell me a bible for US $59.99, I will take an orange one if possible

Trojan

Every time that I read an RNS and interpreted it to be indicating failure, the market took no notice, until the next RNS left no doubt

Throwing insults, is not a form of debate, skip that bit for clarity

I am happy to label my belief that the last RNS is a precursor of poor results from the USFS, as an opinion, but also believe that opinion is well formed.

No doubt that opinion is subject to ridicule, if events prove it wrong. What will it mean for you if it proves correct and you casually disregarded it, for all the wrong reasons

I expect you will see the light in the next RNS, then what will you say.

Knowledge gives an advantage, it surprises me how reluctant, so called investors are to seek it

MysticmacO

So much wrong in that post, I will stay with your comments on myself

I am spreading reason and fact, it is not FUD, that is your interpretation from a position of defense, because you are in fact very uncertain. The verifiable facts do not fit your feeling, I get it that's uncomfortable for you

Lost money on 88e ? firstly you know nothing. I will now inform you, I was a regular investor once, through Icewine 1 to Charlie 1, and made good returns, because I understood the RNS as they were released, this allowed me to exit in advance of the massive drops, when the rest of the market also finally understood what the RNS meant

Each time I commented on chat sites, and received the standard abuse suite, until the abusers were confronted by the market collapse

From there I chose not to invest as 88e became overpriced in an enduring hype storm, but have continued to call it as I see it, with 100% accuracy so far. Did you get that, correct every single time. So my record is at risk here, if the Upper SFS delivers, its time for some humble pie. I expect to remain hungry

I am not here to bash longs, I give them information and analysis, however I am happy to bash the pump and dump gang, who are here to exploit the lambs, A great example would be Shareguru22, whose activities stimulated my interest, with his aggressive and directed ramping

I dont believe in religion as such, but caring for the less able seems aligned with your Jesus to me, so find you statements to be hypocritical

Musk, you have been sold a fallacy if you believe share prices only go in one direction, knowledge is the key here

PANR were subject to a co ordinated dishonest short attacked, based around an inconclusive initial long term flow test result

Knowing this was a beat up, allowed investors to gain extraordinary value at the bottom of this cycle. The fundamentals have only improved from there, reinforcing the value, even now it is still half the price of 88e per barrel, and that is assuming 88e have full success in this testing at Hickory. That is the difference between hype and fundamental value