Member Info for Olderwiser

Taxi 23:52

Under the data sharing agreement, and with the assistance they have provided, you can be confident PANR are well informed on the results.

PANR are involved as it was a mutual gain, each company gained access to data on an exchange basis. Talitha data for Hickory data as announced. Reading between the lines fracking design and flow back knowledge was also contributed as PANR wanted the best possible outcome, in both data quality, frack efficiency and fluids collection/flow, as there was potential it could be meaningful to them. Even if the outcome is poor the pure data is valuable as a model input

When investors tout the probability of a joint venture or PANR buying in, they then have to confront the reality, that 88e oil per barrel is much more expensive than the vast quantity PANR already have at contingent resource stage, in a superior up dip location

Note PANR have been purchasing leases further to the North, and promoting its superior qualities because it is up dip with lower compaction

Asking you to apologies for your poorly researched opinion, may be unpleasant for you, but it would be the decent thing to do

I will also leave it there as I don't believe you will be changing your spots any time soon, perhaps your shorts though

Taxi

The definitive answers are here on 88e, watch B Rosenthals head for the nod or the shake at 50 minutes in

https://youtu.be/i2mDrh74Ck8?t=2993

Snout

You have everything to apologize for, you directly call Scot out, he had done more than listen to a webinar, as many of us do

If your standard of research is to cherry pick an isolated piece of an answer from a webinar, but not read the RNS.

It is little wonder you make such poor decisions

Honestly you have made a fool of yourself so often, what was the last piece of FUD. They need the gas for pressure support, rubbish.

Good to see D Hobbs publicly debunk that piece of nonsense, stating it was reinjected for storage /disposal

Your problem is you do not know your subject matter, as can been demonstrated by reading either of your "Brevarthan Research" junk science attack pieces

Now get on with your apology to Scot

Troughsnout

The apology is due to Scot, and yes it is due, as you were dead wrong once again

I see no point in debating with you any further, as you are a now many times proven bad actor, but do expect your false information to be corrected, as and when

Troughsnout 17:24

How can you write that, when you have just done this

There is deception and then their is outright dishonesty. you continue to cross that line,

ATM you obviously owe an apology for this one

"Who was it that said they had whole core. Oh yeah Scot. Well they don't. Just sidewall. No one serious going to punt on these fantasy numbers without whole core "

SLB Modelling Update - Ahpun Western Topsets Individual Well Type Curve

SLB has continued its dynamic modelling of Pantheon's reservoirs and provided a single well model based on the rock properties logged and sampled (whole core) at the Pipeline State-1 well location. This results in per well recoveries of 3.7 million barrels of marketable liquids and 8 bcf of natural gas.

Troughsnout 17:24

There is deception and then their is outright dishonesty. you continue to cross that line,

ATM you obviously owe an apology for this one

"Who was it that said they had whole core. Oh yeah Scot. Well they don't. Just sidewall. No one serious going to punt on these fantasy numbers without whole core "

SLB Modelling Update - Ahpun Western Topsets Individual Well Type Curve

SLB has continued its dynamic modelling of Pantheon's reservoirs and provided a single well model based on the rock properties logged and sampled (whole core) at the Pipeline State-1 well location. This results in per well recoveries of 3.7 million barrels of marketable liquids and 8 bcf of natural gas.

Gemstar

More lies from the crew, did not own a single PANR share back then

Why don't you share the ASX data today

ASX close at .006c on 54 m traded

VWAP .00627 (GBX .328) 'the best indicator on the ASX to average out the lumps

MMO, there it is, that is a series of opinions, not facts

One of which I know to be 100% false

If you dont know what this means by now, you are no oil investor

A total volume during the flow back period following establishment of oil cut of 24.8 stk bbls

of oil recovered following establishment of oil rates. A total of 1.45mmscf of gas and NGL’s were

recovered from the Upper SFS test,

Taxi

There should be a bit to learn on the Hickory implications from the other side of the fence in 12 hrs from now

Pantheon will be hosting an Investor Meet Company webinar at 5.00pm BST on Wednesday April 10th. Those wishing to participate can register through the following link:

https://www.investormeetcompany.com/pantheon-resources-plc/register-investor

MMO

You know nothing John Snow, a simple minded character assassination is all you have, because you have no counter to an analysis, that does not suit your agenda

Pennies ADZ,

First time I saw this I missed the GBX bit, its an English trap I swear

MMO

No no No read and understand, I topped up at the lows 10p, and have an average price of under 18p.

I am a fundamental investor, I invest on long term merits, not short term trading opportunities of hype cycles like 88e

Stas20

That is a completely flawed argument, what I comment on is my opinion of a share, it prospects an some oil industry knowledge I can add

Would you accept that a positive post on the prospects of PANR at a low of 10p should also be weighed.

Funny enough despite the short campaign wreaking havoc on PANRs share price, the fundamentals have continued to only improve throughout the decline. Imagine the joy at being able to buy in heavily at 10p, at 40p now it has just begun the restoration to a realistic fundamental value

Taxi

When a well is produced, the pressure is dropped at the bottom of the well, to create flow. The pressure drop will reach the bubble point in the reservoir liquids, at which point gasses exsolve from the liquids.

Gasses by their nature will travel faster through the resistance of the reservoir rock, so are able to bypass/overtake the oil in place.

In this case dropping the pressure too low will create a disproportionate high gas flow . In a conservative flow mode, the pressure drop at the bottom of the well is managed, to minimize the gas released back in the reservoir pores.

Once oil has flowed into the well bore, gas will of course exsolve, as the pressure drops in the journey to the surface.

No harm done there, but within the reservoir it is going to create excessive gas flow, thus raising the GOR

From the 2000psi well top pressure reported, I believe an aggressive flow plan was implemented

Well management can assist in reducing the "producing" GOR, poor management will increase it, but the in situ reservoir original GOR is a fixed constant set by nature itself

The produced GOR is a simple calculation divide the gas produced by the oil produced over the same time period

Baits, I forgive your lack of knowledge, that may not be your fault, but your manners are inside your control

Interesting for sure, no doubt that is genuine, it even has the missing sand hoppers nicely back in their rightful place

It is a huge flare, especially when measured against the maximum instantaneous flow measurement of 77bopd

That is a lot of gas for a small amount of oil to produce, looking more like a gas find with a little oil co production

From the RNS numbers 24.8 barrels of oil and 1,450,000 scf of gas produced over the flow back period.

A GOR of 58500 scf per barrel of oil, Note a dry gas reservoir is considered above 50,000 scf/bbl

That said I will speculate that 88e in their enthusiasm to produce a good looking oil flow number, over produced in their testing, which would cause more gas flow than a normal conservative flow test program, thus pushing the measured GOR to this extreme

Lets hope the SMDB is a better composed reservoir, and they have now developed a bit more discipline to their testing regime

Redirons

You know what, I place you on the wolf pack team

Xarfax

I have been open that I hold no shares, and will add no shorts, nor interest in persuading people to buy or sell either

What I aim for is to give balance to the outrageous pumping that occurs here, the exploitation of the less informed, by the wolves dressed in sheep's clothing, that cycles up every year

Xarfax 20:57

A good company doing a good job, does not write such a word salad of an RNS. It has taken almost a week to untangle its actual meaning, from the apparent meaning. A good company writes a clear and understandable RNS, so investors can make an informed decision.

It reads like there is a 42 barrel average production rate over the test, but the truth is only 24.8 barrels were ever produced

They have quite effectively made a silk purse out of a sows ear, but the full truth must eventually emerge from behind the smoke and mirrors, what then for genuine investors that took action on the spun up impression it gave

Posters here squeal in mock outrage when their ramping and disinformation gets corrected, maybe they should stick to the facts for a while.

The idea that its the MM manipulating it , or derampers, is a pure ramp itself, its the market being a market thats all