RE: Whilst we wait for H1 numbers …29 Sep 2023 13:29
Question
Nicolas Katsapas (Analysts)
So the question was on the neutral impact that you spoke to in the medium term for the U.S. distribution, but how does that work between gross margin and fulfillment?
Answer
Shaun McCabe (Executives)
So yes, there's some puts and takes, of course. So as we move into the U.S., what we'll definitely expect to see straight out of the gate is inefficiency. I mean, we've got a big shed and we're going to start with one brand and maybe we'll get the second brand up and running pre-peak, but it's a lot of capacity for one brand, and we're not at scale. So the cost per unit is going to be a drag for this year until we get to scale and get the rest of those brands launched.
There's going to be a higher import duty and a higher inbound cost of freight as well, moving product indirectly into the U.S. but offset against that is the benefit that we get to outbound shipping. So instead of shipping from Sheffield to the U.S., as John spoke about earlier, we'll be shipping from Pennsylvania to the U.S..
And so we get the -- so on a cost basis, as we scale, we expect the costs overall to be broadly neutral. But of course, the win here is that we get the opportunity for local fulfillment in a much better proposition. And John spoke to 95% of U.S. households within 3 days, it just gives us the opportunity to compete in the U.S..
And we talked about how, for us, this isn't really optional. If we are serious about growing our business in the U.S., and we absolutely are, then we have to have a local fulfillment and local proposition. And this is the step. And so I'd rather make that step and then work to optimize the cost base and optimize the speed and the delivery times and all of those things and just get out the gate and get going with that.