RE: Closing Price...9 Mar 2022 20:48
With a total of 1,684,273,523 ordinary shares, a reduction in shorts from 0.88% to 0.75%, means that to close the short they had to BUY 218,955,558 shares between the 02nd March and 08th March. The sp has gone from that time from 26.23p to 20.82p. This could only have happened with II selling alongside Marshall Wace LLP reducing their short. Interestingly on the 13th Dec, at the last time of the trading update M&C's short was 0.79%. Shorters and Rampers will look at these observations how they want.
IR will find some way to fumble the delivery in the new company accounts format, having disappointed at each trading update. So expect major confusion whilst everyone works through the detail. Predictably the major headlines on net debt, free cashflow, effect on revenues/profit from inflationary pressures/Covid will dominate the 1st reaction. Though broadly neutral some headwinds should be expected in the Experience and Portfolio division, with free cash flow expectations pushed into FY23 and dividends pushed into FY24. Post-IFRS 16 net debt at 31 December 2021 will be above £800m+. That all said, the Company will demonstrate continuing progress in turn-around and the P/E is already so low, which asks the question why have IIs been selling to balance the shorts closing. So again broadly neutral.
Though the MMs will play this to their advantage, the end price of the sp this week will be the macro news.
At only Day 14: With the 12-hour ceasefire agreed by Russia and Ukraine coming to an end, Zelenskyy reiterated his call on Sky for the West to impose a no-fly zone, saying eventually the West will inevitably have to join. This is now being repeated multiple times daily. Though the humanitarian situation is terrible, it seems that with each day there is some greater escalation with no self-reflection on the missed opportunities that have gotten both sides to this point. Having repeated all the same provocations that led to the annexation of Crimea in 2014, and doing exactly everything that Russia said would result in a further military conflict; it seems that no planning was done by the Ukrainians or the West on dealing with any military escalation or humanitarian fall-out. Invest in a national air force and train pilots (nah), get guarantees from the West of joint protection even before formally joining the EU or NATO Alliance (nah); restrain some of the oratory before this has been assured (nah);invest in trauma units (nah); have contingency plans for buses and trains (nah), order the mass evacuation of eastern border towns to humanitarian camps in the west of the country (nah). Instead you see old women and children working it out for themselves. There'll be some film inevitably comparing this struggle to 'Dunkirk', though it seems more like 'Dad's Army'.