Member Info for Nolupus

I think that you have already got my response to that question. ....

Now let's get the snowden response , if you don't mind

"You have offered zero denial of your repeated failed attempts to secure an R&D role with ImmuPharma — and several other companies. "

It's up to you to prove your unfounded allegations , not for me to deny them , I am waiting for you dig your hole even further, i am laughing all the way to the bank 😇

Digging digging digging 🥵

Your " Truths " are as far away from reality as Trump is a democrate 😜

" I shall not disclose his full identity for now but I will take action if this vendetta continues. "

Please feel free to do so , as your vendetta is clear for all to see ... I don't need to hide behind 10 different nicknames like you do ...

Alexsnowdown,

Please refrain from personal diffamation and libel , as all you are doing is digging your own hole and it might just backfire on you 🤔

@Che7win

I actually thought you were a genuine person , till now ..

I think you should stick to " facts " and not totally stupid commentary which shows that you haven't a clue of what you are saying .

LOL

"Otherwise I will send this information to immupharma and ask to proceed legally against you or i will do it personally. I do my own research! "

If that is the nature of your research, please feel free to do so, but be aware that your diffamation and libel may cost you a tidy sum 😱

Your research is worth as much as the toilet paper that i used this morning and smells just the same 😭

Your hate campaign and your multi pseudos don't fool anyone so keep it up and let's see what happens

Best regards to all genuine people .

TCGLOVER,

Of course , I agree totally with you on the point that a lot of small biotechs find it hard to attract investments.

The proof of that , was this mornings RNS and in the fact that IMM have to pay huge amounts to Landstead to distribute shares to the market ...

Positive Newsflow may come , New partnerships may be signed etc etc , let's hope so or Mrs Halfbutt will be very angry .☹️

@TCGLOVER

You may believe what you wish, but as far as i am concerned, i made a simple error and i have apologiced for that .

Error is human ...

@TCG

Whilst being proved wrong on the point that there is no sharing of the profits above the benchmark price of 8p... ( Thanks for that correction , as it's important to be factual) the main hypothesis remains factual

Landstead can never lose , if the SP stays flat , goes up or goes down.

They are Extremely well paid for just basically selling those shares into the Market ...

Best regards

@ che7win

My apologies to you, as you were correct in stating that there is no sharing profits above the benchmark price .

I was mistaken in believing that there was a 50/50 sharing of the profits above the benchmark price .

Best regards

That is why i suggested to halfbutt a few weeks ago , that we should expect news before this years AGM 😙

Best regards

Scrodingercat,

Whilst i agree with most of what you Say about 2027 voting , I don't know if their current shares give them the rights to vote on this current placing as they are and " interested party "

But Tim may not be up for relection next year as he is advancing in years and may just retire , who knows ?

" It should be noted that a subscription for Ordinary Shares and investment in the Company carries a number of risks, including the risk that investors may lose their entire investment. "

After a wealth warning like that, some people put their money where their mouth is and demonstrated their faith in the company. They have taken the risk unlike Landstead who have no risk whatsoever.

Calling a spade a spade !

Thank you for confirming my analysis

" People prefer to support Landstead "

It's a pity that the company cannot get support from even their strong buy crowd...

People prefer to support Landstead instead of IMM is my only conclusion

But everyone to their own

"We are delighted that, with the support and investment from Lanstead " says Tim

But , At what price ?

Lanstead always win from any deal they do with IMM, that is a fact and can be proven very simply .. but IMM don't and neither do the shareholders 🥵

In this simplistic example we shall see how Landstead can't lose , ever

In this new deal IMM give 100 million shares to Lanstead

Which they hope that Lanstead will pay them back in 20 monthly payments of £300 K .... 300k x 20 = 6 million

For Landstead, they will only do that , IF the SP stays at the reference price of 8p ( and not 6p for the 20 months .)

In this simplistic example Landstead make approx £2 million + their free shares for having signed the contract

Now let's imagine 2 other scenarios

1) The SP is at 4p for the 20 months

In this case , Landstead will only pay £ 3 million to IMM Instead of the 6 million expected by IMM

So therefore Landstead make approx £3 million + their free shares

2) The SP is at 16 p for the 20 months duration

In this case Landstead will pay the full amount of £ 6 million to IMM + half of the difference ( sharing profits ) so approx £4 million extra so in Total approx £ 10 million to IMM

Landstead profit approx £ 6 million + free shares etc

As one can see from these simple calculations ...

Lanstead will always win if the SP stays flat, goes up or goes down .

** As we all know , the clauses in the contract are more complex and therefore this is just a quick, simplified approach **

Anyone care to do the maths and see what interest the company is paying to Landstead ?

Nobody ?

No risk and HUGE profits for doing business with IMM 🥵

Lanstead always win from any deal they do with IMM, that is a fact and can be proven very simply .. but IMM don't and neither do the shareholders 🥵

In this simplistic example we shall see how Landstead can't lose , ever

In this new deal IMM give 100 million shares to Lanstead

Which they hope that Lanstead will pay them back in 20 monthly payments of £300 K .... 300k x 20 = 6 million

For Landstead, they will only do that , IF the SP stays at the reference price of 8p ( and not 6p for the 20 months .)

In this simplistic example Landstead make approx £2 million + their free shares for having signed the contract

Now let's imagine 2 other scenarios

1) The SP is at 4p for the 20 months

In this case , Landstead will only pay £ 3 million to IMM Instead of the 6 million expected by IMM

So therefore Landstead make approx £3 million + their free shares

2) The SP is at 16 p for the 20 months duration

In this case Landstead will pay the full amount of £ 6 million to IMM + half of the difference ( sharing profits ) so approx £3 million extra so in Total approx £ 9 million to IMM

Landstead profit approx £ 7 million + free shares etc

As one can see from these simple calculations ...

Lanstead will always win if the SP stays flat, goes up or goes down .

** As we all know , the clauses in the contract are more complex and therefore this is just a quick, simplified approach **

1 )