Member Info for Nolupus

Yep,

But as you can see from my examples that they are capped on the amount they make on the upside ( above 8p ) but not on the downside ( below 8p )

** Whatever happens they are guaranteed at least £2 million + their 12% free shares ** for distributing to the market the 100 million shares during the 20 months

Nice risk free job 😉

Spantrout,

If the SP is at 4p for the 20 months duration

Landstead pay back £3 million to IMM for their 112 million shares

So Landstead Make at least £3 million + free shares

If the SP is at 8p for the duration

They pay £ 6 million to IMM for their 112 million shares so Landstead make at least 2mill + free shares

If the SP is at 12p for the duration

They still only make £2 million + free shares

@spantrout

Actually it does make a difference to Landstead because they actually make more money if the SP is beneath the 8p figure than if it's above it ....

Best regards

Otm,

Reality is neither black or white but Somewhere in the grey ...

This proposed placing gives runway to Q4 2028 according to management and going by Wigwammer's figures the company will be using circa £5 million on the overheads and the rest on the new pipeline so

No new placings should be required until 2028 ( unless of course , that the SP stays well below 8p for the 20 months duration )

So let's stay factual and wait and see

Best regards to the genuine people on here

Ogm4,

I look forward to the end of the year , when the paper gets published 🤔

Best regards

What is an major indicator for anyone investing in biotechs is a company's ability to attract investments from large institutions or specialized Venture capital funds. These funds attend all the biotech shows and have in house specialists to verify the investment case and they INVEST their money in Moving the science forward .

Why have IMM not attracted these funds to give them the funding for the new P140 plateform ?

Why are they reliant on Landstead and the p.i. ?

Ok , I will waste my own time so ...

But btw , I didn't sidestep any direct question but whatever

I will take your figures as you won't argue with them 🧐

2 - 2.5 million a year / 12 = approx £170 000 - 200 000 a month

Max Shortfall = 6 months at £200 k = £ 1.2 million

Even if shareholders voted against the placings don't you think that management would find another solution to find that shortfall ??

It would give the company another FULL year to conclude a deal with those " potential partners" and not use Landstead to further dilute shareholders who are rightfully very concerned about the lack of progress .

They could ask Landstead to rummage in the cupboards ?

They are very good at that apparently

Oh no, can't ask them Tim

Why not ?

Because we have too much skin in the company Tim ..

Yes , IMM invested over £2.3 million into Incanthera for shares and warrants resulting in dilution for IMM shareholders and a HUGE loss to the balance sheet .

It's funny that Landstead found something in the cupboard to bring forward yet there was no cash left to do it ...

Sun screen for all shareholders 🥵

"As i said before, in my humble opinion, the biggest priority right now is getting those resolutions passed and securing the Lanstead cash. "

Some would like people to put on their blinkers and rosy tinted glasses ...

Vote for more dilution because that's the only choice ?

Going from 140 million shares in 2018 to 624 million this month and thanks very much for all your support shareholders .

We are giving free shares to Lanstead and hundreds of thousands pounds profits every month for 20 months to distribute shares to the market but whatever, thanks for letting us dilute you ever further 🥳

Eyes to the stars but feet on the ground

Tim Mc Carthy's 70th birthday is coming up in August, will he thinking about retirement or will he still be working hard on delivering shareholder value ?

Let's wait and see

All one has to do , is look at the IMM website under Aim rule 26 ...

Best regards to the genuine people interested in facts not censorship

That's what happens, when you use automatic robots instead of real humans to do the moderation .

The "strong buy clones " are abusing the system .

I believe people who are interested in debate and free speech should inform LSE of what is really happening on this board

Yes yes professor1,

What is your point ?

Best regards

Professor1,

What is a fact ,is that the TR1 was annonced in january 2026 ....

Was that before or after the patent application ??

Let's stay factual

Best regards

That's his story to tell and not for anyone else ....

Everyone to their own convictions and trades .

Roger65,

There was a time , when the directors held nearly 20% of the company, but that was down mainly to Robert Zimmer , the founder of IMM

"Check your facts before you post false information and mislead the board "

Still waiting for any proof of your diffamatory allegations, but as that is impossible, please practice what you preach !

Cauldstream7,

I am afraid that this board has become Extremely nasty especially over the last couple of weeks / months .

I must say that whilst we may not always see " eye to eye " on certain topics , we are not in that category.

Freedom of speech and debate is what is important on these boards , imo and not mud throwing.

Best regards to those genuine people

"I remember reading YOUR posts on this board, probably before or after the last Phase 3 results (can't remember exactly), you said you met and spoken to Sylviane Muller and gave her your 'opinions and recommendations'. "

I will refrain from insulting your " intelligence" but why would anyone on this board , give their "opinions and Recommandations " to the Prof ??

Total rubbish