Member Info for Ninetopprizesof

And at long last, Rio have stepped in to help.

Trebles all round.

Cheers.

If you are truely invested here and you want to protect your investment, might I suggest emailing GGP concerning the LCA.

They have been ducking and diving this issue for far too long, far too long!

We've just experienced another "rinse and repeat" from Actusray et-al and I fear this will continue until GGP put forward a definitive RNS in relation to the LCA. The longer this prevails, the more susceptible to a buy-out we become. And, I believe it will not be favourable to the private investor.

Major investors - different story. History tells us that.

thank you, james.

in layman's terms does that translate as -

we have speeded up the evaluation of the lca because it is a major issue, (doesn't confirm anything).

we have updated our plan to deal with the issue, (doesn't confirm anything).

because we have updated our plan, it seems it is better than our previous plan, (doesn't confirm anything).

"pleasingly" the absolutely diabolical "guestimate" one of our apprentices put on water volume proved to be wrong and as such we are cracking on with our original plan, (doesn't confirm anything).

we haven't yet had approval, but we are so ****sure of ourselves, we have gone ahead and paid for the lining materials for a further 2 ponds.

we've identified an alternative "easier route" so we are modifying our original "abomination" of a plan, (doesn't confirm anything).

i have sent 19 emails to date asking for any sort of clarification, i have received zero responses.

Hi Dip,

"I've also been relieved of duty from admin team for expressing my disagreement in recent months with how some of the admin are not allowing debate or how they are behaving to some members who are more open to explore pro's and con's."

Hi Bamps,

"I believe the Tailings issues are part of the sell process. Newmont stated they have a superior standard to Newcrest and they’ve employed specialists to check it over.

A buyer would need guarantees that the dams are structurally sound and now they’re being upgraded. Yes it might hold the sell process up."

I'm all for open debate and discussion.

Shall we all stop ignoring the elephant in the room?

Telfer is not the issue here.

Perhaps I missed the "recent" official update on the LCA?

Not a dicky bird since the issue raised it's ugly head!

Aluminium Corporation of China... and who do you think is the controller here?

Biggest investor in Rio?

Might look like 11% holding... but I assure you, with their "tentacles" they hold a hell of a lot more. And with that comes power.

Magnum, "So this new poster as of 5th Jan 2024" So you are saying because I'm new, anything I have to say is utter garbage? Take a look at what is going on in the local elections my friend - "new doesn't mean irrelevant, surely?"

Gadbury, as I have already said, I am invested - quite heavily. And because I am so much at a loss, I will poke and twist this BOD until they answer my questions clearly. Numerous times I have not had a response, numerous times I recieve a copy and paste from their most recent "presentation".

Like I said, I have been shafted too much with the positive talk of CEO''s (MD in Sd's case), to just run along with the yes sayers because there are generally more of them, and to be fair, they're very good.

Don't let the bully posters deter you from speaking up for yourself. During the day they may be Peter15 and if they are desperate, for whatever reason, they will appear in the evening as Tontoronto.

Please think about it.

Slim, why are we all invested?

To make money of course.

I hope you know as well as i do that if we are bought out by Rio for, lets say, 14p per share, agreement with major holders will have been reached to see that they are given a side agreement in order to see a healthy profit.

Cannot believe you guys cannot see this!

Aside - with the issue of the lower aquifer, if all doesn't go to plan with the project, who is going to stand the cost of turning Telfer site to as near as possible to original status?

Look all over the world and you will see it is common practice for a major to off-load to a minor. and when that minor cannot fulfill the task, who ends up paying? the taxpayer, that's who.

Defering listing on the ASX isn't a decision taken by SD, the Australian Government want assurities.

Indemnity insurance is what is being asked for, who is willing to provide it?

No one. Why?

Come on Chuff, no disrespect but this isn't 6th formers playing cards.

Cover for negotiation...

Every Tom, Dick and Harry can see what has happened here.

Even the current investors.

Just don't want to face up to the reality.

Big BOD, from big named companies. The majority of whom are NON-EXECUTIVE.

Take a close look at how many companies they are non-executive directors of!

Do they not sleep at night through worrying over the ins and outs of GGP?

SD does nothing but skirt around issues that are very relevant to us investors.

Like I said before, I have lost lots of money because those who I have entrusted my money to have presented themselves and their company as the dogs b0ll0cks.

People, please read between the lines and don't be swept up!

You will of course get the antagonists follow this post with absolutely nothing but insult and the usual degradation of my motives or indeed my character. Some are more intellectual, or should I say sly, than others.

My advise to any co-holders is this... email GGP and ask for a definitive answer over what is taking so long for the lower aquifer issue to be resolved.

I bet my bottom dollar you wont get an explanation!

If you've got money invested, exert your right to get an answer - that's the law!

Don't listen to the idiots who will undoubtably respond to my post.

Trippy, excellent.

Did you work out who the rep from Sprott was?

Of course you didn't, you weren't there!

Absolutely no malice intended Bazzaman,

"I'm not sure what your concerns are"

He did not give us a definitive answer

"He expects to make rapid progress to the Ore & I believed him."

Rapid progress? What's that then? A week or two, a month or two, a year or two?

I'm not holding you accountable for your views my friend, more so SD failed to address the issue properly.

Look, we are progressing.

Doesn't answer the question for me!

Bazzaman, appreciate the response, I really do, because most tend to duck and dive.

But there is nothing hypothetical in any way whatsoever in asking about what, albeit any, issue we might have with the lower aquifer, surely?

Apologies, I meant Mibb

Piff, first one for me. shall not bother again.

Bazzaman, in a taxi now myself. Did you feel SD failed to give an acceptable answer when questioned about the lower aquifer issue?

What a surprise, yet another C&D order straight to my e-mail!

MF11 - of course... invested heavily and and so very worried about why youre making a loss?

for the pedantic's this is merely my opinion.

as shareholders we seem to be in a quandary.

serious question, which no doubt the ********s will immediately jump on-board with accusations of de-ramping...

mr day and his compatriots have get-out clauses in relation to their "options"

not one member of the board or executive team, or indeed major investor, will suffer a loss if we are taken out by the likes of rio.

read between the lines my friends.