Member Info for Ninetopprizesof

MH01 - Yes, I will do. Thanks

Redirons - everything I post on here is in an attempt to get answers to things I feel I need to know in order to make good calls on my investment - wouldn't you do the same sir?

My methods may seem odd if not random, but I get the answers I'm looking for.

"Ninetopprizesof BS, if you had cared to have read my post correctly, you would of noticed I’d paraphrased the article that was written by RCP Research. If you have an issue with what they said, I suggest you take it up with them ! But as everyone here knows, you won’t will you. Just like a crazed dog, you prefer to attack the postman instead of the author."

Dear oh dear, you say "if you had cared to have read my post correctly"

I did read your post correctly, you obviously didn't read mine correctly. I asked you to give us your interpretation of what you had posted.

I have no issue with the author, my issue, as you put it, lies with posters like yourself who post others' views/opinions without an iota of understanding Don't worry you are not alone in doing this.

And yes, recently I banged on and on and on about a particular issue I didn't understand, in the main due to lack of credible, coherent information - obvious to all what that was. But my constant shouting bore fruit, someone who I hold in high regard and consider totally reliable, contacted me and gave me the answer I was looking for - a full easy to understand explanation as to what was happening.

Are SCP Research held in high regard and totally reliable?

Or do they have their own agenda? Just like all the other "notables" who big-up or run-down shares.

I'm no psychologist but the traits and timed appearances of Tymers and hannahjack1 seem to suggest one and the same. I could be wrong?

Tymers, that too would be a possibility.

Having observed the to's and fro's on here for some time now, one does notice certain relationships. And there have been some compelling characters, compelling as in entertaining, neither positive nor negative but entertaining all the same.

In most cases I think I can see a primary antagonist - only to be swerved and thrown into the realms of reconsideration.

I get it that the serious, heavily invested here (£10,000 to some is a lot of money, £1000 to some is a lot of money) might be annoyed by what I suppose could be described as absolute rubbish, if not destructive / negative chatter.

In 2017 Proactive interviews with Gervaise and Callum attracted a typical 4000 views. In 2020 it was 3000. Over the last 12 months the number was, on average 1000. The past year views have hovered around the 1000 point. The Q1 last month was notable - it attracted 2000.

So we can at least make a guestimate - the number of posters here over the last year to date (multiple identities taken into consideration) falls somewhat short of last months 2000 views on Proactive.

Hence my earlier statement that a very large percentage of private investors either do not join in with the board or more likely, they don't even know it exists. It was after a long time before I came across LSE - quite by accident in all honesty.

If folk want to green bin, that's their choice, but in the big scheme of things anything discussed / argued on here surely has absolutely no impact on our SP. If it weren't for those that have been binned this board would be dead.

Liam, who grew tired of the negative posters here decided to create GGPHelp. (by his own admission he was not what could be considered a large investor) Initially, to some, it was a breath of fresh air - it allowed the serious ones to chat within their mutually agreed boundaries. I do admire Liam for that. GGPHelp has been and, in the main, continues to be a relatively reliable source of information due to it's contributors, who put an awful lot of time into what they do.

Here, on the other hand, we have the freedom to sing praise or vent frustration - it's all entertainment.

Onwards we go

Pottersfield, It's always possible they are the same poster but in my mind it's unlikely. I did wonder whether Tymers and Napthman were one and the same, who knows?

Topped up today, perhaps slightly more than I should have; but I'm now feeling confident.

I realise there is the possibility of a raise (unlikely in my view) and even if there were, it would probably be like last time - not open to us PI's. I don't want that to sound negative, it's just how things are - if that is the case I believe the SP will rise quite rapidly. My average is now 8.1p - feeling somewhat chuffed. Whatever happens it's a win win for me. I firmly believe what's about to happen but shall keep my opinions in that regard to myself. Experience on here tells me that.

Onwards we go

Quite surprisingly and certainly unexpectedly, this morning my concerns / fears regarding the LCA were allayed.

I am now more than happy to hold my position, in fact, I shall be buying more shares in the morning should I get the opportunity. (in no way intended to be advice or otherwise - do your own research)

I shall not discuss or indeed mention the LCA again.

Onwards we go.

MH01 earlier today - "However some of us would like to manage our risk and given the quantum of unknowns currently I personally want to know what is happening. The share price is in limbo and we have no clue what is currently happening and where GGP is headed. Newmont are quiet. So wanting an update is quite normal."

Regardless of whether that was an attempt to mock or convey contempt, the fact remains - if the LCA is an issue, whether physically of financially, then all of us as investors need to know. I sincerely hope it's not, I have no wish to lose money. The big guys will get out before us private investors and the SP will go down quicker than the Titanic. Just to reiterate - I sincerely hope there isn't an issue. All I'm seeking is some honesty from Mr Day. Despite several emails - which were previously answered, on this subject I have received absolutely nothing - which does cause me a high level of concern.

The Lower Confined Aquifer MH01 - Everything, all the dreams depends on this my friend.

Markjphennessyg @ 09:58 - "There’s probably NDA’s in place regarding some of what’s going on at the moment until something is finalised."

TimberTrader @ 10:24 = "Indeed Mark, that's pretty much a certainty. Any company in negotiations in M&A activity will need to view company research and the like, which will be covered by NDA's."

I'm pretty sure that Newmont would like all and sundry to know that there isn't a serious issue with the LCA. And I'm pretty sure that any good news about it wouldn't be regarded as confidential in the terms of a NDA. Why on earth would it?

Everyonesawinner - "How is this 9.3% down - CROOKS"

There may or may not be crookedness - who knows for sure?

During the last Call Period (as with all Call-Periods), a "matching algorithm" takes a look at the orders (buy or sell) and calculates the price that the maximum amount of shares can be executed. The aim here is to find the most popular price, rather than the highest or lowest. Beneficial to the Market Makers of course, but is there a fairer way?

It seems, to me at least, the larger volumes traded here, for some time, have occurred during the auction periods.

That could be questionable in some minds - could an "entity" place a large number of separate orders to control that price? I don't know.

Obviously anyone wishing to push through a large order (or part thereof) will use the auctions, rather than regular trading as the aggregation of buyers and sellers means that the impact on the SP of the large order can be minimised.

The volumes we have been seeing don't suggest the building of a huge order. Is it a myth that orders of a TR1 magnitude do not have to be declared until that particular order has been fulfilled? Again, I don't know for sure. Either way the amount of shares being traded for a long while now, don't suggest to me that anyone is building. But who knows?

It looks like the wise ones are setting buy orders as low as they can in the hope of getting in as cheap as possible. That's fair I suppose.

Bamps21 you say -

"When you work out the decline length that is only 352m from that bump and not the previous 562m.

That’s over 200m shorter length to get through the aquifer plus it takes a further 46m to get both the floor and the roof through the aquifer."

46m to get both the floor and the roof through the aquifer - is absolute nonsense - what on earth are you trying to say?

So, the original mine design was 200m longer than the revised "plan"?

That's a red flag for me - why didn't the planners choose this route in the first place?

It seems to me, at least, the relatively run of the mill conventional shaft construction - presented in the PFS was a load of shyte even taking into consideration that the PFS would not have been overly focussed on the shaft construction.

It seems we have met more than anticipated when it comes to the LCA.

I suggest we might be looking at greater shaft diameters than were originally planned now that we are taking an alternative route through the LCA.

Perhaps it would be worthwhile exploring what we can do, from our contractors perspective and what we, as owners, can afford to throw at it - since the task of reaching the lode has evidently become larger, more complex and more expensive than initially envisaged.

Our old partner in this project, Newcrest, employed the services of Byrnecut for shaft sinking at Telfer - 1130m deep with a 7m diameter - a combined production and intake airway. (similar split shaft at Gosowong in Indonesia - intake and exhaust airway), Take a look at what happened.

This new route to mining will take something like 6 - 12 months, in my view, if indeed it is possible. My view is formulated from studying western Australian shaft sinking operations, hard rock in the main- but lesser encountered to date, with deeper mining, - weaker structures in the Paterson region.

If your comments are to warrant even one iota of respect I suggest you talk in laymans terms rather than trying to come across as a seasoned geologist. Avoid the old theory that if I use big unfamiliar words people will think I am an authority - if you cant put it into laymans terms you will either, at best come across as a chancer and at worst, a despicable fraud.

Laymans language - can you do that - I very much doubt it!

YNWA91

" ...some of the ‘LTH’ on here that reply to the nonsense every night ..."

Nonsense? I would welcome your input regarding the aquifer - like I've said - zilch from Greatland - no update, nothing.

Mr Day, unless he's found some soft sand to dip his head into, hasn't bothered to give comment - and he full well knows this is a concern for us. I bet there are plenty on here who have fired off an email to his crew and received no response or the usual cursory blah blah brush off. Like I said before, several emails sent - zero response. WHY?

Redirons, you are avoiding the question of what is going on with the aquifer - why? Are you another sheep, swept up with the preaching's of the Cabal? Show some balls mate.

Jamesp21,

How long has the issue of the Lower Contained Aquifer been going on?

Everything, absolutely everything depends on it.

Why are you not asking what is going on?

Don't give me flannel about Mr Day says this and that - I want to know what is going on.

My intention - is my investment going down the pan - if so, I don't want to wait until the "big Guns" have exited and I'm left holding the bag - why don't you understand that James? Please give me your assessment of the situation - and if you do, I hope it's not Mr Day says this and Mr Day says that - not acceptable for me I'm afraid.

Yes Cheeky, and you and all the other Green Binners are still responding.

TomE - yes, I shall spell your moniker correctly because I know it annoys you.

I;m glad you responded because I feel you are one of the sheep that follows the instructions of the Cabal, perhaps in the hope of being anointed one day - even going so far as reciting and to some extent attempting to enforce their mantra of not allowing anyone to question what is going on.

Here's a taste of just some of your recent posts, trying to gain favour with the Cabal, me thinks you have let yourself down.

"Again you reply. Just filter them and there is no reason to reply, easy."

"This troll is getting to you as he wants and really upsetting you. He is a waste of space and will one day be banned, sooner the better as all he does is disrupt the board and YES everyone responds and replies to him >>>>>>> what.

BIN HIM AND FILTER THE GROG>"

"DONT reply to his carp !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

"This new pest Peppers who told all he "sold out" seems to have overtaken the board !

I do not even read his or other trolls post as better things to do so best all get your fingers out and press FILTER."

"Rothers hi, with total respect great comment, you strongly state "stop responding and what do you do respond" ???"

"If you have, as you say greened them why even bring up the subject ??"

"You sad person, take a pill or ten."

"Goodby you pleb. Binned for good thank heavens "

"Told you !!! Not to post me again with your CRAP."

"Reported as abuse so NO More from your Big MOUTH."

"Go back for another 10 years holiday in Bagshot where you were asked to leave as nobody liked you from the first day "

What is it TomE? Do as I say, not what I do?

Pottersfield, known to some on here as potty mouth, I wonder what goes on in the Potters Field? Is that the field where the Cabal meet up and do as they wish with the sheep? Wellington boots available?

Hopefullygod, what "FACTS" have you provided?

None, none whatsoever. Simply making reference to other peoples posts on here or twitter does not constitute facts.