Member Info for NikeAir180

Ammending 19:28: correctly quoted in two sentences, the post...

Re: 14:35: Helpful correctly quoted, in two sentences, the posts you alluded to Banbury in the Boring Boy thread at 16:34, you falsely claimed he was making it up.

I have updated the relevant thread that was cited, at 19:21.

Re. 16:34: He didn't make up the post you alluded to Banbury.

Helpful correctly quoted you Banbury from your 06:32 post on 06/02/24. You were replying to poster: Legin252 and the point, I assume of the citation, today, was not, whether you ever had a position in Superdry but that you recommended it whilst being negative towards RRR.

17:12... Ok, understood (16:34) reasonable to reply to either of the threads.

You didn't want to claim that in the BB thread? by way of your reply to 14:35.

Zimbabwe, have to correct a spelling for a country and it is still the fifth biggest producer, my instinct is there is a good amount of lithium in that hill and have sometimes wondered, is there any tin?

Sometimes tin and lithium are in the same area. Andrada Mining is an example of a company with that situation and Cornish Metals and Cornish Lithium get along well.

Am not too interested in lithium directly although I respect its uses but even if it is just for historic production reasons or just chance, Tin Hill is a good name for an area of prospective lithium, in my opinion.

Re. 15:02: Not me Zumore, commodity prices will vary so ratio to market cap might vary, I prefer tin - so like the name of the hill for which I remember there was a c shape, Zimbawe is the fifth biggest producer of lithium and ALR is currently fully impaired for the accounting year which will be over before some people have had most of their summer pub lunches.

Knew the rhetoric when I saw it and that Banbury was cautiously optimistic according to his posts, occasionally.

... balance of time spent...

Seeing as 12:39 was responding to 12:34, I will respond to 12:38 by saying "how long does it take?" what time it does take might be given back in the day or so much work time has been put in recently, that the balance time of spent might not be unreasonable regardless of the content of opinions.

Am happy with New Ballarat and all of that, it has always been a substantial part of my positive opinion.

11:58: Zumore, your final sentence in that post leaves enough room for you to potentially doubt your negative perspective, in my opinion.

Banbury, your penultimate sentence doesn't make sense.

12:13... night of the day that the meeting took place... different time zones.

Re. 11:27: A source of opinions taken up by others may not be honest, if someone refers to a combination of opinions as lies it it does not mean that one of the responders to the source of opinions is regarded by said person as a liar.

If expressed opinions are held with honest belief of their truth, the expresser of such opinions is not lying, even if mistaken.

The start of the passage that you did not include in your quotation has beem supported on a mainstream podcsast on a main stream news channel, the same night of that meeting - at least in part and possibly the same mumber of requests was referred to (can't remember if it was twice, for certain but do not remember it as once) - in which case there may have been a truth in the passage of opinions - which was not included in your quotation.

Re. 18:06: Both currently and in the past, I have not read all of your posts as literal signifiers of belief.

Politicians and media also need to think carefully in realtion to some apects of this wider conversation and what could follow later down the line, in subsequent years and later generations with regard to potential regulation.

Honestly held opinions without malice seems worthy of consideration when judging the comments of others.

Where do you expect to find your own answers or your own patience?

Too much e at 17:06.

Body Mass Index is known for sometimes classing good aerobic capacity rugby players and pehaps persons in heavyweight rowing crews as overweight and in such instances of non-specifcity, it becomes a meaningless corruption with false guidance from a perceived average.

A healthy heart and good blood pressure comes from within, those important aspects of fitness are not perceivable from external appearence or biased imagination from this share chat.

If someone mentions their height and weight and someone who still cycles and did a lot of cycling in younger days whether just from enthusiasm or also competitively, they might have been a lighter build based of 70 miles being easy after weeks of inactivity -presumably with a strong background - in younger days.

It was the cycling fellow (as I remember it) who first or was certainly one of the first who expressed another poster was overwieght, without evidence.

Although complacency might not be ideal nor too much concern... health of a person can't be always determined from appeaerence and bodyweight.

Like all animals, it is wise for humans to eat healthily.

Re. 13:34: Another dog is barking and I know why.