Member Info for NikeAir180

18:27... the RNS from RRR detaling POW taking a 49.9% stake in RRAL was on 29th April 2020.

The RRR contribution to refinancing African Batttery Metals was on 30/01/19. From an internet search, it looks like the publication of ABM's annual report with regard to activities of 2018 and the subsequent restructuring was on 29/03/19 - the Charman's statement was dated on 28/03/19.

African Battery Metals became Power Metal Resources on 24/06/19.

Re. 15:20:

Parfait123, in reality it was Red Rock Resources who got involved with the refinancing of African Battery Metals, for which there was an RNS in january 2019, there was a vote by ABM shateholdets to approve the refinacing. After the positive vote RRR had 25 million shares in ABM, Bell joined the board as Executive Chairman with Paul Johnson joining as Executive Director.

There was an annual report explaining tbe changes on 28/03/19 with a Chairman's statement by Bell. Afican Battery Metals became Power Metal Resources on 24/06/19.

It was during the latter part of April 2020 that there was an RNS announcing POW had bought a 49.9% stake to be able to pursue a joint venture with RRR, in RRAL. Further detailing of this was in the 2020 annual report and it was in one of those relevant RRR, RNS' that it was detailed POW asked to join the joint venture so that they could have exposure to Australian gold asset(s) through a joint venture.

RRR were awarded the 25 miilion shares in ABM at 0.5p, they sold those shares as POW shares at multiples of that value, in stages.

RRR helped ABM survive, helped ABM become POW, and the percentage(s) of POW shares helped RRR to continue as a going concern when they sold them in profitable stages.

I think both companies continue to have a good relationship.

Penultimate paragraph of 15:57: he did not.

Banbury you once said to me you sold some shares on the way down from 1p and (last year) that you had known the company for five years.

Other times when naysaying, you have said you have been following the company for over five years and over 20 years.

You once joked - that wasn't made clear but given the rest of your comments and the abrupt way it was expressed, I took it as a joke - from approximate memory - I regard it as from the summer of last year, and said in response to poster: news - that you had a 100k invested.

On the way down from 1p you said you had retained the value of a pub lunch invested.

It doesn't really matter what you have invested but your inconsistency is slightly more interesting than how much you say it is down on someone's watch.

Re. 11:34: There was an RNS on 15/01/25 mentioning a meeting on 22/01/25, then an RNS on 24/01/25 confirming the meeting from two days earlier took place. The 20th January stuff is from Banbury's imagination and is not supported by fact.

11:32: Correction and clarification regarding Melville Bay Limited.

Re. 11:10: Robins that investment - Melville Bay Liminited was fully written off as per the annual report of 2017. It was subsequently sold for £1.00 on 29/06/18 as per the annual report of 2018.

Wasn't it multiple years ago for you Theeeduke regarding this company, including previous nickname(s)?

Either way, one of your recollections might not be as reliable as the other one or perhaps they will share unreliability.

Not three.... loans at 0.5% Banbury, cut the crap.

... There was also normal text on the RNS of 24/01/24 referring to the meeting that went ahead two days earlier, that week.

False comment by you at 08:35 Banbury, in actual fact there was a 15/01/24 RNS advising there would be a meeting on 22/01/24 and it was in normal text.

The 07/10/24 RNS contained a boxed section which referred to an initial 16 day period, perhaps those activitiess were fulfilled and the 06/11/24 RNS was referring to that, supported somewhat by the 18/11/24 RNS. The idea of gold sales by the end of 2024 was only expressed as a hope, which was quite precise.

There are places in Australia: historically and currently very good good for mining.

Re. 08:20: Not "endless FW's", but you were wrong on an aspect on the other thread Banbury, which you sort of acknowledged but today over-emphasis an abbreviated term of address. The polite style does not conceal your attempt to denigrate, it does not conceal how much you have it dished out to a few of the positive to RRR, posters, mainly Helpful, but yeah... manners on both sides of the debate are a reasonable aim.

Zumore, 20:18: I did not read any contempt from back then towards others. There is no defence for what you posted yesterday and you know that. You and Aimdogs have been wrong before, you might be wrong again, you were yesterday.

15:54: point 1: incorrect, points 2 and 3: I doubt that.

Most of the naysayers today...

What a joke but not a funny one.

Theeeduke, what about Buffet still going strong mid-nineties, Munger carried on till he was 99 - the mind was still sharp, plenty of people will carry on as veterans because their minds are still sharp and they enyoy it.

Zumore, I remember when it was common some traders who did well in the 80s and 90s would retire around 30, and I know for a fact not all who did had personality less worthy of respect, intuitively I assume that will be true of many.

Banbury, you are not an angel which might be worth remembering when you try to float higher.

Zumore and everyone else who tried that pile on, you as people, lost today.

13:52: not all of the loans though.

Ditto: video imterview late March 2023 or early April 2023, RNS was on 28/03/23 - which interview likely followed from, half-year report was 03/04/23.

Final correction (hopefully) of my posts on this thread... 03/04/23 was the date of that year's annual report.

19:33... the half-year report from that year was actually dated 03/04/24. The video interview I was referring to is no earlier than 28/03/24 if I am correct in assuming it followed from that day's RNS, from the web it was listed as 1 year ago, it is still within 2 years back from today.