RE: FIG2 Jul 2025 23:34
Whatever the science and I for one do not believe climate science is a fully-fledged physical science because of its reliance on speculative and sometimes dubious modelling, there is little doubt that the Green's cure for our problems is woefully inadequate. Wind and solar are useful additions to an electrical supply but their density (energy/sq km) is far too low to cover for current needs, let alone future needs including AI and EV. The Green's failure to promote nuclear power will be seen as their major shortcoming. It take a decade or two to build nuclear plants. So fossil fuels, particularly gas, are now guaranteed high levels of usage for many years to plug the gap. And unless we're going back to the stone age that's the current story.