Member Info for NicetoMichu

Here's to 'something brewing' not just being another pot of Yorkshire tea...

Again, CB doing some order management of assays is fine by me... but he also needs not 'take the p=ss' .. and less Yorkshire tea and more RNS signing off is a good recipe for not taking the p+ss, whatever way you look at it.

best make it a blue pill if you've got nine ladies dancing as well as the wife to keep happy

thanks Trek btw..

''Zinfandel…. Oh dear… filtered.''
I rated you towards the of top all time posters end on these boards porschefund.. after that ....well....I'm going to even move you UP one more notch..... The purists do tend to frown on the Zin/Prim.. but I've got a sweet tooth and love both.. (it was Brazin B - Waitrose- btw and not as rich/sweet as the usual zin/prim experience..so purists might even give this a second look .. then again, who am I trying to kid.. they may well not ..)

It disappoints me that for such a long time here, comeonvog seems to find it really - times 10 - hard to process the concept that people are entitled to opinions that are different to his.. it doesn't seem to be to do with a lack of intelligence, so I'm going to go with arrogance.

very kind cautionourblast.. you and many other posters together make this the board I rate most highly since I've started posting on lse.. I'll raise a glass of Zinfandel to you all in 10 mins ..

That's very helpful Trek, thanks... and I should have looked that up myself first..

Re :
'' If the enlarged entity seeks admission, it must make an application in the same manner as any other applicant applying for admission of its securities for the first time.”

I wasn't thinking of it like that .. so that might well change my thinking again.. and I need a re think on this generally.. but, far more importantly, nice wine beckons now, so file my previous post under bin please .. or indeed just filter me generally might be a good idea :-)

''Trek - the company have made no mention that the publication of the AIM document is contingent on government approval. Given how long we know this can take, it would be a big omission on their part if this were to be the case.''

I continue to be surprised on so little comment here on viewing this paradigm from the perspective of how long AIM regulators may or may not allow save.l remain suspended: if AK wants save.l to remain listed on AIM, he - now -has to re list when he's told he has to relist.. ie the regulators are the ultimate arbitrator here, not AK .

(Maybe looking at it from that perspective can be more uncomfortable and so people just go with disregarding that perspective as it might be inconvenient to their aspirations here.. so fine by if all disregard this post completely too :-) )

Fine thanks UR and I hope you the same !

Great if point 1 happens.. if no, point 2 has sundry content that interests me a lot.. and I'd take this share plenty more seriously IF I see much of that happen..

in the interim, I've adapted my expectations down here punchily.. and therefore am not overly caring about us being around mid 20's p as I type.. and I also feel freer about being a bit more open in posting my genuine thoughts here.. but believe it of not, I'm still toning them down somewhat, towards being nice(tomichu)

this remains a hugely illiquid share Rimsha.. that has major consequences in both directions of travel..

That post is constructive and appreciated UR.

(With you and a few other quality posters offering plenty of constructively good posting here, I don't feel too bad about not bothering resolving to be more constructive here in 22... and so, indeed, I don't feel too bad about offering : with 12 years under your belt already here, what's another year :-))

You'd like to see year on year share price progression at the very least.. and this would have to finish the year whatever north of approx 1.25p for that to be a reality.. A good Congo update soon could still allow that happen, in fairness.. so here's hoping for that.. and above all, here's hoping AC is LUCKY in 2022 :-)

Generally, I've recently being getting the feeling that AC is looking like he might be spreading a co. the size of Zen too thin across sundry complex 'opportunities' ....and hence this s/p fall doesn't surprise me.. and If I wasn't plenty under water on the 6 odd k I've now left here, I might even have been open to dumping a bit more at .90p, now.. as this can of course readily enough fall further...but I'll not bother now.. and this hard core punk share could of course bounce too..

Mr Stamp out there banging the drum at least.. alas, lack of tangible outcomes on the near horizon seems to be a massive issue for this s/p .. so Mr Stamp may as well stop presenting now .. especially if all he's doing is crystallising the thought that bottom line meaningful news is not near..

Under 20p as I type is a shocker.. if it goes under 18p I'll start topping up.. only because this has been good to me previously through range trading and it's all the houses money I'm now playing with... otherwise I'd be gutted at where we're at s/p wise.. and looking at this objectively, this company has been up there with the greatest clusterbuck on AIM since coming to market.. truly an appalling performer, sadly.. but hope springs eternal.. blah blah..

the spread here is generally about as farcical as I've seen on AIM.. MM's should have rules around the extent of spreads they're allowed in sundry different circumstances.. what they do here feels shameful.. but it is what it is.. and to a reasonable extent i understand my bet here is text book red or black roulette playing

(no intention of going to the AGM btw.. but great if anyone who does wants to post some feedback here..)

On waking this morning, did you have a strong feeling that xtr was going to rally hard today 1DAYMAYBE, hence your post back here today ?

ps: Please could you respond to this post with a prediction that xtr is going to tank between now and the end of the year :-)

Great post indeed Andrew !

Ps; In case of confusion, I'm fine with the one and only Mr Colin Bird stage managing the assay results feedback as he sees fit
and
while I understand why many here have high expectations of bushranger - I have reasonably high expectations - it's tangibles like the summation of MANY assay results that allow better clarity on what we actually have.. so best wait and see many more of these towards allowing the formation of strong views here .. as the market seems to be clearly doing..

fair enough Agadem and re reading that last RNS again now, yours do not seem unreasonable expectations...

There are regulatory requirements around re listing timeframes Agadem .. looking at it from that perspective as opposed to save.l doing it when it best suits them can paint a different picture in my mind ..

I'm with MountTeide on the President's office being the - absolute, categorical -key progress driver here.. and the extent of their gamesmanship should never be underestimated.... It would be great if they'd signed off on this deal already... and they could of course have had.. but, recently, I'm getting a feeling they haven't yet.... and if they haven't yet it might be a huge achievement to get them to do so in the next week and a half for eg

PS; they're getting whatever share of revenues from existing production ongoingly from Exxon anyway .. any fall off in production from whatever issues have been experienced recently would still take a new operator time to improve on too..so that's not an impediment on them taking their time on this decision to an 'African reasonable' extent.. and the temptation for the President's office to come up with a curve ball of a 'new' per cent of sale proceeds 'tax' that's a big problem to Exxon actually completing a sell out deal around now remains a lingering doubt in my mind for eg

and it remains some group for one group of falanxers here, I see..

as still on my radar - to perhaps, maybe - get back into at some stage.. I still take the RNS's and have a browse..

more 'Jam tomorrow' and still a life style co. .. but still half a chance they make properly good sometime .. all imho