RE: New CEO?19 Jan 2023 14:18
Which Christmas - for the Lithium land sale - was not offered in fairness :-)
They absolutely should keep mentioning timeframes and actually deliver against them, at least plenty of the time imho
Surprisingly to some and even a little to me, I ticked up Caberts post two below.
But one sentance in it I take some issue with :
''The issues here are more about shareholder impatience, timing and markets than they are about bad management.''
As well as Bad management I'd say.. not in a geological context - they're good at that - but in various other contexts...
Generally, they're stuck in a time warp from 20 years ago as to what it takes to stimulate and maintain interest from Investors in such a stock imho.. but It's a bit late for radical change now, I get .. so carry on as they see fit and get this sold for a decent price in the next 18 months, please.. is all I got left.
PS: i've given up a fair while back on a top price here, whatever.. the big industry players set the rules and they're brutal in getting good deals for themselves .. (and agree their shares would be a big/huge part of any deal btw)