Member Info for Newuncle

SP is 90% down from 3.5p.....you need alot more 60% days here

Ray,

God knows what you have been doing every Friday for the last 18 months or more then....

No Pub

No Drink

No Dancing

No Delight

Prior to those numbers

John Burrows was on £360k

Key Executive Remuneration (based on 2025/2026 data):

Iain Gladstone Ross (Executive Chairman): Reported remuneration approximately £286.5k.

Paul Leslie Stockdale (CFO & Executive Director): Reported remuneration approximately £211k.

Dr. Alexandre Akoulitchev (Chief Scientific Officer): Reported remuneration approximately £244k

Makes you weep.......

Not just salaries btw...looks at the white elephant UK Lab they built.

Still can't hold 0.30.....just dropped

Where is Billy's TR1? Would be nice time to issue that

Yup

Well until an RNS says otherwise this is a classic P&D sub penny share rise driven by day traders acting in unison.

Great party when you are an early guest, late comers will pay a hefty price of admission and probably have the worst hangovers once the music stops.

FOMO at its finest right now

Published but it has narrowed just now.

Spread on these is insane

I used to work in high tech comms space. Fwiw, National Agencies in all major countries will sign up to take the "latest" tech on a regular basis. This is so they can both evaluate it for potential useage in their own inviroments but also so they can pull it apart to understand how it actually works in case they need to develop defensive measures against it being deployed by bad actors.

Ssccss,

Last post for now from me as I have other stuff to do.

The apppointment of Sparks RNS dated 23 April 2026

Appointment of Financial Adviser

The Company has appointed SPARK Advisory Partners Limited ("SPARK"), a London-based independent corporate finance adviser and sponsor, to act as the Company's Financial Adviser.

SPARK has taken responsibility for communication and is directly engaging with the FCA on behalf of the Company. The Company remains committed to returning to trading on the London Stock Exchange and will provide updates on the steps towards achieving this in due course.

The outstanding questions that the Company, through Spark, are resolving with the FCA are in the majority, legacy issues which must be dealt with prior to the FCA being satisfied that this Company is suitable for re-admission to trading, rather than the alternative, being cancellation from listing on the Exchange. Shareholders should not underestimate however the damage done to this business in the past by former Boards and management, and, as stated previously, there can be no guarantee that a request to return to trading will be accepted. The Board and advisers are working closely with the FCA to achieve this.

Ssccss,

0ver 60% voted yes, that is significant.

Ssccss,

The company is in direct negotiations with the FCA. They cannot lay out all the remaining issues line by line in the public domain, I don't think the FCA would like that all, some things have to remain limited in public disclosure terms. No one likes that but that is the reality and the right way to progress matters with the FCA.

Ssccss,

The yes votes were significantly higher this time for BoD elections. I would say confidence in the BoD is actually very high indeed.

Were it not for JW's votes, ALL resolutions would have carried.

Ssccss,

But as we know mud sticks...it's a delaying tactic and causes potential reputational damage to the company with the FCA as they progress to release the company from suspension.

Ssccss,

You cannot dismiss it as "nonsense".....it was designed cause further disruption to the company and damage it's reputation with the LSE and the FCA.

Now the key question is why is someone so determined to do that?

No point in discussing with ASI as he posts his claims as 100% certified. But is he right? I think not but that's my opinion.

Note no abusive or belittling comments from me about him btw.

Perhaps he should consider how he responds as he will respond.

Ssccss,

The LSETOP review that has been requested (by someone) is clearly designed to make the company potentially subject to RTO rules being applied. That would stop the company coming out of suspension.

IMO