Member Info for Newuncle

ASI,

You can filter/unfilter any time.

For now I am reading your posts as there has been news to review.

That's it.

Ssccss,

I would refer you to Mr S post timed at 8:43

Thanks ASI....how about seeing what the minutes actually reveal?

The LSETOP investigation hasn't been RNSd has it so they did discuss that issue and it was not in the public domain prior to the AGM was it?

Unless you think MR S in not accurate in his posts about what was said at the AGM?

Ssccss,

Why would anyone issue an unfounded claim with LSE TOP to coincide with the timing of the AGM?

Ssccss,

It's about the bigger picture now. The more actions that get thrown at the company is both a distraction for the BoD and the FCA and now the LSE TOP too.

Mr S,

That's interesting as TE has attended every other AGM to date. Wonder why he avoided attending this one in person? He had plenty of notice.

SSccss,

A question many people have raised more than once. What Is their motivation and who's backing it?

Mr S

btw did TE attend in person?

Mr S,

So you secretly recorded the meeting I assume?

It's only that way because certain parties are campaigning to keep the company from ever coming back...questions remains as to what their real motives are and who's behind it all?

That's because there will be minutes from the AGM published at some point....that should provide a fuller version than Mr S has posted?

I am simply asking questions......that's all

Mr S,

So not you or Mr W then?

Mr S,

Would you know how and why that LSETOP action happened btw? Who's involved?

Mr S,

I think we could see alot more details than you have posted to date......but then you already now that don't you?

I'm hoping to see the minutes from the AGM published soon which should be very interesting to read for a number of reasons....

Down another 10% Today....jeez when will it all end ?

An Investigation.....I imagine it's a standard procedure...they will tick a few boxes, ask a few questions and then file it in the WPB

Under the UK Takeover Code, acquiring 30% or more of a company’s voting rights triggers a mandatory offer, requiring the purchaser to make a cash bid for all remaining shares. This threshold applies to individuals or "acting in concert" groups and serves as a key indicator of control.

How on earth could anyone even begin to suggest that RMD have 30% plus here?

LSE will bounce the claim out soon enough....it's rubbish, 100% rubbish...whoever did it can;t prove a thing