Member Info for news

Seconds to closing today, 30.9.25, I checked on the share price LIVE and HL quoted 1.28p+ to sell and 1.29p+ to buy. Look at the top of this page as well as it did state the same as HL. Placing was 1.3p. So, where is the 1p from? HL would take all at 1 go from me as a test but do try yourselves if anyone did today.

Stock Maiden

Recommend your post for the data links. LoL, I personally thought you were a bit too nuanced in stocks which ever side of the book you took at the time.

Your post here does appear to show you can be on the buyer's book as well. Ah, interesting.

READERS OF THIS FORUM:

ChatGPT or whatever AI was used by the people posting including what other AI and they looked up the geology as well. In junior miners, NOTHING is GUARANTEED as geology is not dialled up as one would wish. So, BEAR that in mind.

My word, the board is going to be told at the AGM from what I am reading, not in so many words.

Me, I read what OAK Securites said and to those who have seen other co's , well, it wasnt a shock to me, put it that way. Why? I have been on other companies as well and this happens but PROVE ME WRONG if not so ie placing. AIM is for growth co's and therefore if dont want any placing, then try the mega co's or whatever suits. I post so that GOING FORWARD, no one can blame anyone else isnt it?

LOTM-13.

Cross lines. I want to make 100% sure you KNOW that it was NOT ME that said Wishbone Red Setter is a "potential Tier 1." Why? You mentioned your expectations etc about Tier 1 or potential is now ...isnt it? Clearly, you are very unhappy. Most of the names here on this forum are seasoned investors especially soltace as we have seen each other's names for quite a long time on this site. So, they know the rodeo as this is not their 1st rodeo on AIM. Each have their OWN VIEWS = TAKE OWN DECISION ie buy, sell, hold etc. 30.9.25

Off-grid. Recommend.

To top it all off, OAK SECURITIES PARTNER WAS IN DARK PRINT and he further says : " We look forward to a STRONG relationship with the co AND EXTENDING OUR SUPPORT AS REQUIRED." Extending our support as required!!!?

1st part of Jerry Keen, Corporate Partner of Oak Securities: " We are VERY EXCITED to be working with Wishbone at this K E Y s t a g e

in its DEVELOPMENT." Development? Huh? DYOR. Please check.

Yes, LOTM-13 in your view, WSBN have NOT SPENT the money so shouldnt be asking for me. That is your view but practice is another thing.

If you are NOT happy, you can take it further with management but all of us are in the SAME position and UNDER OUR OWN CONTROL ie HOLD, BUY, SELL etc. 30.9.25.

I dont know about Oak Securities but I do know and quoted VERBATIM what the partner said. It is well known that the $$$ people wanted in isnt it? I dont KNOW for sure so that is up to each one to decide now given the stock market is closed at 5:15pm, 30 Sep 2025 @Tues.

LOTM-13

Oh, I would also like to ADD further to what I said : Expert Geophysics Ltd were hired to do a MMT, 3D modelling of RED SETTER, 13-15km from Telfer Gold Mine. All of us have seen the 3D modelling etc and from the size of 3km potential strike and the depth as with PATERSON GEOLOGY, Western Australia, it is not difficult to know the SIZE of the potential RED SETTER DOME isnt it? But should you disagree, up to you. What we , investors dont know is the DRILLING results ie assays from Hole 1 & 2 Red Setter and this is known to everyone from the RNS 's [plural] and NO ONE can say they DONT KNOW isnt it? 30.9.25

LOTM-13

You cannot say that I said-I CONFIRM I SAID NO SUCH THING. I quoted Chairman Poulden and gave a link and it is stated "POTENTIAL" with it.

You are very unhappy with everything and that is your right but try to CHECK as I have stated given I give LINKS and REFERENCE TITLES. So, that is why my posts are long as I quote verbatim in " ". Thanks.

From the £4m raise today, 30 Sep 2025:

"Jerry Keen, Corporate Broking Partners at OAK Securities commented [in dark print]: We are VERY EXCITED to be WORKING with Wishbone at this

K E Y stage in its development. We look FOWARD to a STRONG RELATIONSHIP with the co and E X T E N D I N G OUR SUPPORT as REQUIRED."

Comment: That is verbatim and therefore, what is "extending our support" mean? Well, Oak Securities can only support with MONEY isnt it? Very clear.

LOTM

Your reasoning to another poster is your view as you stated from reading into the raise today of £4m dated 30 Sep 2025. However, you must consider this and it is MY VIEW ONLY [others can disagree as its their decision and money] that were Hole 1 and 2 , say for example ONLY, not successful, then it could NOT CONTINUE ie NO MINERALISATION ISNT IT? But in the raise of £4m today, the STATEMENT was given by Chairman Poulden about EXPERT GEOPHYSICS work has been PROVEN [read the details] so this is the BASIS of the RAISE isnt it? So, PROVEN means? Means that the 3D was correct thus far from drill hole 1 & 2 isnt it? So, one for the HISTORY BOOKS of WSBN Red Setter, Paterson, Western Australia. DYOR. Not advice but a discussion of what it could OR COULD NOT MEANS. Sorry for predictive text errors. 30.9.25

Today, £4m was raised and the reason with title was given it EXPLORATION. In my view, very few co's can raise that type of money. Someone asked me how much did Greatland raise for Havieron and I said £1.5m for Phase 1 [5 holes] and Phase 2 [4 holes] was the SAME again. Someone told me before I went out that the RED SETTER drill in 2022 was "not economic." I never read anywhere it stated not economic - both DL, Poulden and Colin Bird stated in an interview at ORCP, RNS and interview that PRODUCING MINES are working on 0.5 g/t au. From the Red Setter SURFACE drilling , the grades came in up to 6.4 g/t au and 2.77% cu copper so how can it be so? Just asking. What I DO KNOW is that WSBN was looking for the SOURCE of the GOLD & COPPER found in earlier drilling. Why? Telfer is some 13-15km away and is there a SOURCE of mineralisation at RED SETTER? Hence, the RED SETTER DOME was drilled and is being drilled at Hole 2 now, target depth to 1,000m although the geology is to at least 1,400m other co's have drilled to. Hole 1 drilled to 777m before drill rods ran out. Hope that clarifies but each to BELIEVE their own views but that is general knowledge ISNT IT? 30.9.25

MM will take everything in 1 go from me to sell despite the above RAISE. I cant go back to the former titles as the thread crashes. But in relation to what was said it is well known FROM EVERY RESOURCE, there is NO SUCH THING as a mineral deposit being ALL SOLID GOLD OR COPPER!!! So, yes, the key is of importance. To buy it is 1.29p+ and to sell is 1.28p plus - so , it close to the RAISE price of 1.3p.

Title of the WSBN RNS as above and verbatim: "...have been very promising and the PRIOR ANALYSIS by Expert Geophysics has

P R O V E N to be HIGHLY A C C U R A T E." - Chairman Poulden.

Comment: As I stated that in normal 3D Modelling , there are COLOUR CODES and a KEY , the latter of which gives a gradation of

potential range of % mineralisation for example in soil analysis etc. So, in the released 3D Modelling there was NO KEY given but

they will have it. In any potential project, THERE ARE AREAS of HIGHER and mid and lower areas isnt it? I will look it up again as rushing.

Hollybean.

Recommend. Yes, your words are true of every AIM co- DONT BLAME anyone else : High risk and to potentially an equal share the opposite reward to risk ratio. 30.9.25

At this point in time and with interims out of what was stated for WSBN's 100% RED SETTER Gold Dome [see RNS today], that is going to be a matter of

H I S T O R Y and what it will say forthcoming isnt it? So, pick your own choice and decision.

Why, these days, new rules state that NEW CO's coming to AIM have to be MINIMUM £6m mkt cap isnt it?

At 1.3p for the raise today , I see the opening price was 1.35p & previous 1.45p. So, appears to be no huge discount as could be norm isnt it?

50% for RGL-ORCP vs 50% for MEGA.

A/c to DL earlier [Chairman of RGL who is the operator of Northern Zone , Kalgoorie :"Game Changer" re: tweet].

£7m ORCP with 20%.

Many JV's like Greatland get 30% of project ie 30% vs 70%. Here it is 50% vs 50%.

ORCP £7m mkt cap for production coming of Northern Zone Gold Project, Kalgoorie, Western Australia. A/c to a header earlier, someone poste £50m a yr for ORCP? I have to look later as the link is broken. 30.9.25 [Tues]

Contd.

Press the wrong button.

"and the PRIOR analysis by Expert Geophysics-----------HAVE PROVEN--------to be HIGHLY ACCURATE . ----This fundraise will enable further exploration of the exploration of Red Setter for the current year."