Member Info for news

Conceptual modelling: I chose the following perimeters: [1] Average grade 1.5% TREO [Ken RNS, 5.6.26]. [2] Footprint: 600m x 1.5km [600x1,500m] instrusive complex [company's description of outcrop/carbonate groupings [from previous RNS]. [3] Depth: Historical Shali Group diamond drilling reaching =215m=

: recent holes averaged > =85m= & all ended in mineralisation [ open at depth]. 215m conservative BEST case, with sensitivity for deeper extensions. Trend: Exceeding 2km in WIDTH [this could imply broader mineralised corridor inc dykes/sheets BEYOND the MAIN COMPLEX, show sensitivity]. Bulk density: 2.8t/m3 [typical for carbonate rocks, ranges 2.7t-2.9t/m3].

//Base conceptual case: 600m x 1.5km x215m = Vol, Tonnage & Contained TREO//

This assumes the entire volume is mineralised at the average grade [a simplifying assumption; actual carbonate is in carbonate sheets, dykes & breccias with continuity noted in drilling.]

Data & Perimeters from Kenderick Resources RNS today and previously + MARGIN MINER'S POST 15:18 , Fri, 5 June 2026 for the Shali Group 2017/18 original drilling comprising 14 holes with thanks. https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/marginminer/

P.S. The volume is NOT given but I have the figure and it is to let Mr Colin Bird, Chairman of Kenderick Resources to view since the Chairman reads his share forum - he said so in an interview.

Correction:

Per DGR Global, ASX folks: The company sold their shares. The data was outdated. Fri, 5.6.26.

Thanks Englishwonderer:

Colin Bird on Twitter per the link given: "Activity and Progress CONTINUING at Bezant's Hope & Gorab Namibian project. Photo's below:

1] Fixed survey beacons being installed around the Hope OPEN PIT site.

2] SITE OFFICE up & RUNNING.

3] Removal of impact CRUSHER for routine overhaul. #BZT ..." -Tweet at 3:09pm, Fri, 5 June 2026 , Colin Bird Mining on Twiter with thanks.

HL is showing the above per my account. Kindly check. DYOR. Fri, 5 June 2026 at 3:13pm.

Full tweet from Mr Colin Bird, Chairman of Kenderick Resources, 3 hrs ago, Fri, 5 June 2026 on Twitter: Initial Assessment of KIESHOHE suggest potential for a MAJOR Rare Earth DISCOVERY complementing TEUFELSKUPPE." - https://x.com/ColinBirdMining/status/2062841639316427123 [11:19am, Fri, 5 June 2026] . RNS also released on the above. Mkt Cap of Kenderick : £31.7m at 8.5p + 11.48%.

Kenderick Resources RNS, Fri, 5 June 2026 : "Update on KIESHOHE project."

LoL. Fabulous RNS and everyone is saying so by quoting from the RNS today.

Thank you taking into consideration what I said to help genuine shareholders of Kenderick Resources plc who are subject of the noise factor on this forum. News. Shareholder of Kenderick Resources.

So, you do read your stock forums after all as you said in 1 of your interviews.

Relating to the article, it may interest readers to know that Ganfeng has filed at the International Arbitration Court given once they took over Bacanora [London and Canadian listed], their Sonora licences were "taken back". Cadence Minerals , London listed have also filed a similar case against that country.

But it is well known that cases against countries could affect their status in loans such as from the IMF 101? So, lets see how it will transpire if anyone is interested but I am not particularly interested in international arbitration cases as that is a specialist branch of law. Fri, 5 June 2026.

Contd: Fri, 5 June 2026

So, now, Pbow, Nicholas Mather joins that elite group of Australians who have MANAGED TWO OUT OF TWO LONDON LISTED CO's that have got Chinese majors to take over their co's. Name any other co listed on the AIM that have received a Chinese major's buyout. None I can think of except Bacanora.

The commercial world looks at TRACK RECORDS.

I am a RC Pbow and I intend to continue to uphold that I have NOTHING BAD to say of any CEO in any co that I have invested in. If, I am not sure of the projects, then I merely move on. It is the ASSETS after all and what is the EXIT STRATEGY ie taken over etc.

But I leave you to your own views as that is entirely up to you but I am not sure if you are aware that on the HC Australian site, one lady had to payout quite a substantial sum for what she said to the co. Yes, unfortunately, the Courts dont take hearsay but rather EVIDENCE and proof. Another payout was around $250k or that region for posting this and that about another CEO. This was also an Australian case. In the end, it is Theory 101, that not only the people involved had to pay out a substantive sum, there were legal fees and also in cases an apology in writing. YES, proof & evidence is rather difficult you see which is required by Courts and posting is easy.

For that reason, I have NO COMMENT, NO VIEWS AND NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT SOLGOLD OR ITS MANAGEMENT -the record speaks for itself of the takeover by Jiangxi for $1.2bn. THIS IS OFFICIAL AND ON RECORD. TO CHECK, HAVE A LOOK AT THE TOP OF THIS PAGE - LOOK AT THE RNS which is regulatory news service, London Stock Exchange.

I take my leave, Pbow but I hope you will understand that the theory works like this: DGR Global now has cash in the bank and that is a good position to be in from the two takeovers of Solgold and Atlantic Lithium [their daughter co's but later as investees]. The market is in a lull given the full plans of what DGR , ASX intends to do with the money and the DIRECTION has not yet been ANNOUNCED. To each shareholder, it is up to each one how they manage that portfolio. Over the years, I have seen DGR [PARENT CO OF SOLGOLD AND ATLANTIC LITHIUM LISTED IN LONDON] go to Aussie 1c and rose to a high of 8 cents on 8 Apr 2022 [Source: Google Finance DGR Global] - 5 yr chart].

With best wishes. Please dont take issue about typo errors etc. I am short sighted. Besides predictive text changes my words to something else. News, Fri, 5 June 2026.

Pbow

I am not Australian, so I would NOT want to pay for a subscription to read the article. But I have read it via the HC forum.

I dont know about you Pbow given I said I have seen you on this site before but at UKOG plc from recall. You have neither confirmed nor denied my recall is correct or not. Now then, since I have seen you before , it means that my interest was in the same stock as yourself - British listed. junior oily in Gatwick, UK. Nicholas Mather is an Australian so that much proves that you got it way off the mark LoL.

Coming back to my figures, they are TOP line which means accounting wise, that was the portion paid out from Jiangxi to DGR for their %. So, that is correct for history. OFFICIAL FIGURES.

Since you also did NOT deny you are in PR, it was most interesting given AI informed me that many posting are from PR? I am unclear as to why though?

Whatever the AFR wrote on the subject matter, that is on AUSTRALIAN SOIL, not British. It has nothing to do with Solgold , now delisted.

IF, you have invested in DGR and you want the WHOLE CASH PAYOUT, then you will need to see how under Australian ASX rules LoL.

I dont know about you Pbow because if you are really in PR, you would know about laws pertaining to publishing and posting. This is general chat rules on this site and even on HC isnt it? Before posting, the rules are set out and for that reason, it say akin to : you agree to the rules?

As for whether Solgold was paid as much as folks wanted, let us look at NPV of Solgold at $3.2 bn [calculated at 8% discount]. So, the takeout by Jiangxi was $1.2bn [$ parity]. So, roughly 1/3 of NPV. Let us benchmark that with Ganfeng having take over Bacanora Lithium in the UK - last cals was 16% of NPV.

Masterinvetors did write up about Solgold and the potential takeover price in NPV and from recall he said , as a mining analyst, that the capex for Alpala is huge ie into the billions , so the takeover price will have to reflect that. This is from recall. But one broker was correct about the takeover price or close enough and this was the figure I took.

You see Pbow, I went to a school that taught to THANK if one has been blessed and to also give CREDIT where CREDIT is due. On these forums, many used to talk about TAKEOVERS almost daily sometimes but in recent years, that has stopped. Why? Because the takeovers never came. This is due to the MAJORS like JIANGXI AND HAUYOU do not take over small Tier 2 deposits but rather the Tier 1's and in particular district scale.

Let us also put this into context: How many tiddlers does one see get taken over by a CHINESE MAJOR? Answer: Few. So, if you intend to continue to invest, consider that point.

Lastly, in Australia: THERE ARE ONLY A HANDFUL OF IRON ORE MAGNATES who have managed to attract Chinese and Asian capital and today, they are Australia's mining legends like Gina Rinehart, Twiggy & Clive Palmer. To this day, no one has matched Gina's legendary

The above ONLY relates to DGR GLOBAL , ASX 'share after the TWO OUT OF TWO TAKEOVERS.

But Solgold went for $1.2BN and ATLANTIC LITHIUM WENT FOR A$238 MILLION.

Both started and founded by Nicholas Mather and he was CEO at inception.

TWO OUT OF TWO OF MATHER'S LONDON LISTED CO ===TAKEN OVER==. Isnt life GRAND? News, Fri, 5 June 2026.

I was in Solgold from before the START OF DRILLING at Alpala, Ecuador.

The Atlantic Lithium takeover will bring in A$14M end of 2026 from Hayou. So, Nicholas Mather who started both Solgold and Atlantic Lithium , listed in London has HAD 2 OUT OF 2 listed co's TAKEN OVER. This is in relation to DGR Global who owned stakes in both Solgold & Atlantic Lithium. DGR Global has a current market cap of A$28.17 Million dated Fri, 5 June 2026.

Hayou is also in the news today as they will potentially spend $400m on a lithium processing and refinery plant in Zimbabwe. Hayou is the co taking over Atlantic Lithium, London listed. This was the topic of discussion below so just to update what happened to BOTH CO'S MATHER LISTED IN LONDON.

Pbow. Following your update on Cascabel I decided to follow up the story. I wont bore you but the outline is that : Solgold had put in clauses in their 2024 agreement with the govt from what I was told in checking the data. Also, the change in control ie Solgold was bought out did not change that ENSA the co holding the licences etc in Ecuador has not changed. However, new laws have kicked in , in Ecuador and this is now something that will be on the buyer of Cascabel's plate , as to how they move forward.

I only post this, given this has NOTHING to do WITH SOLGOLD, Nicholas Mather as the Former CEO, Founder and Director. This is something in which will be up to the buyer and if the govt goes ahead with what they told the buyer, then it is theory 101, international arbitration may be next? I dont know as I am not privy to what the buyer will do in this regard but this is general commercial theory. However, all international arbitration cases are filed and it has implications for interational loans etc as is norm.

But suffice to say, I am posting this for history for those who were not happy with the price of $1.2bn paid in cash by the buyer and folks wanted way more. Well, the buyer will have to spend more if they chose to take the way of international arbitration.

As for the money folks want from DGR , ASX, this has nothing to do with Solgold either. Why? Many co's win awards but is it a RIGHT OF SHAREHOLDERS that every penny is distributed? I am not aware of UK Company Law that says one is legally entitled to every penny in the co who has just won an award?

But I leave folks to check for themselves. This site is closed and I hope everyone can move on and be happy with what they have got via the Solgold payout of $1.2bn for Solgold. Thur, 4.6.26 11:40pm. ZZZ.

Specinvestor99

I am on this site checking on a few stocks so saw your post.

You say I am n and d?

Well, Sir, I suggest you take the POSTER to court [under what law I am not sure but I certainly have never heard of anything like that as you stated per your post 15:36 today, Thur, 4 June 2026. It is 11:20pm in the UK and what time it is for you, I dont know since you told us before you are not here? Not sure.

Lastly, you said about "impairment" - Banburyboy was talking of "ZIMBABWE" ALR, not Boulon, Burkina Faso in your 23:14 post. Zimbabwe is not Burkina Faso? Thanks. Good night. It is now almost midnight in the UK and we in the UK are ready to go to zzzz. DYOR.

One last little note: Mr Colin Bird, Chairman of Kenderick Resources plc.

Some time ago, I read that you came to London to speak to institutional investors in the City of London. Of course, shareholders will NOT be invited but in the recent Sunday Roast interview, you tried LEVELLING up for shareholders. But you cannot do our research for us shareholders and this is what this site is for ie shareholders to share. For that reason, on HOTCOPPER AUSTRALIA, one does not find the type of post that I have just seen of my post below about PEER ANALYSIS relating to Kenderick [KEN] changed. In my view, it was not welcomed. So, Mr Bird, you will have to find your own way to communicate to all shareholders as anything positive and research to follow up with what you said is not welcomed. And it will leave shareholders in the dark and negativity to thrive 101.

These days, many attending AGM's will also NOT share what they heard or learnt except on your other co, Captain Bob is the only exception who is old school and therefore shares and helps the collective in whatever way they can relating to the co.

With thanks. I hope you can communicate with us as it looks as if no one can post without "noise". News, 4.6.26 @10:30pm. Shareholder of Kenderick Resources. DYOR.

One little notation if I may add:

To all who posted "NEWS" [me] and I am the only one here to have to answer as if I am in the "box" [court and otherwise 101] under "cross examination", let me post something which I think you need to know. In many jobs relating to stocks, publications etc, there are rules to follow by way of PRIOR training and qualifications 101.

Why? Otherwise, there could be "wrongful " "implications". If one worked in a job and day and night posted the type of things one readsjere, I think expect the employer to issue a P45? Why? Has anyone read the type of things being posted today on this forum in the mainstream Financial Times of this world for example? From hearsay and put into print? So, if anyone expects me to JOIN IN, SORRY, I know better.

Just so that folks that have posted : NEWS [me] answer this or that, at me, what I say, is COMMERCIAL REALITY in the office at major publications and firms relating to stocks and no one has ever posted anything like this in any broker report either without any checks , verification etc. Even in a court of law, what is posted is not evidence of a standard high enough to be considered evidence 101 - that is theory.

So, no need to convince me, as I follow the rules and the law. LoL. Thur, 4.6.26 DYOR. 10:20pm.

Banburyboy

I have a life and in the two years or 18 months you folks say I have not posted on this forum , I have been enjoying myself. Why? I dont have to day and night post and reply to 6 people at me or 2 , like today, one after the other with a 3rd joining in.

You now show me ALR disolved at Company's House . You notice it is a private co? Well, just because it is DISSOLVED, does not legally mean necessarily that the licences are not still held in the Zimbabwe mining registry 101 and under what co, name etc? I dont have a legal counsel in Zimbabwe standing by to check and neither have you. So, your story is 1/2 the tale. Besides, the AUDIT listing per the Annual Report is not given to shareholders but it will be under the assets but it is not spelt out licence by licence. I did QUALIFY that I do not know much about RRR assets in Africa.

So, you posted and you say I am kinda of insulting your intelligence? No, you have still NOT proven with EVIDENCE that RRR have LOST the said licences and can you PROVIDE THE RRR RNS to say so? Thanks. I said I am taking my leave so look at it this way: IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER [you say you are to the value of a pup lunch per what I read but it may not be up-to-date] , then you would want to find out. I dont want to know about the lithium in the warehouse as I am not interested in £150k worth LoL. I am after potential Tier 1's. Thanks. DYOR.

We are here to share and there is no need for tis and that. Thur, 4 June 2026 10pm. Stock market closed. See what I mean folks - spec, banburyboy [more than 1 post], aimdogs , blueboy1975 all coming at me with News this and that and little ole' me alone . LoL.

I said I will post after my tea.

LoL, I find that one poster has changed my post. Pardon the typo: It is CHAIRMAN COLIN BIRD WHO STATED: "PEER ANALYSIS". If anyone wants to listen to what Mr Bird said, click, the icon REPLY and it will take one to the video link what was posted by another poster with thanks. Always best to check as in listening to interviews, one can make mistakes, errors.

So, CHAIRMAN BIRD is the one who is giving SHAREHOLDER OF KENDRICK the heads up [ as he does for all his co's via interview 101?] . Prospector has been on this site longer than I have by a few years ie 2009 [June] and me 2011 [July].

To the shareholders of KENDERICK who are interested, Chairman Bird does not give out data and information and the guide book to REE's for no reason. I was in Mr Bird's BUSHRANGERS and his before Christmas interview helped me chart out everything including researching PEERS which is standard ANALYSIS used in broker reportsof award winning firms like S P ANGEL AND EDISON broker reports who use VALUE-in-situ. I dont particularly like NPV as I prefer value-in-situ.

Mr Bird, Chairman of Kenderick said in an interview, he reads stock forums and I presume his co's and that is helpful - this means he knows what is happening and what shareholders know or dont know and he can inform at the AGM if folks are attending shortly in London.

BUT MANY CEO'S OF LISTED CO's know that TRADERS NEED TIMELINES and it looks like Colin Bird is also aware. But my post being changed means that DATA about Kenderick is not wanted. Why? Why ever not given this is from the HORSE'S OWN MOUTH IE THE CHAIRMAN OF KENDRICK , Mr Colin Bird in a very recent interview and therefore what Mr Bird says is so that we [generally meant] can look it up and share. Some posters know more and can share but suffice to say, the 3m holder so he says is now changing my post, so I take my leave and leave it up to Mr Bird as this is his co and I am sure he wants ALL SHAREHOLDERS to know about KEN being the GLOBAL EMERGING TOP 3 per his Sunday Roast recent interview. Why does the 3m holder of Ken shares not want to know? I wonder? Interesting eh? Thur, 4 June 2026 9:45pm. Stock market closed at 4:30pm. DYOR.

Banburyboy

I leave you to your own conclusions etc. As for the article you posted, I will NOT COMMENT for legal reasons.

I CONFIRM that I have NO VIEWS on it for legal reasons nor of the ARTICLE or writer etc . Ta Ta. Thur, 4 June 2026.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW: Where it can be identified, then it must be "VERIFIED" [LEGALLY AND OTHERWISE] and the threshold is definitive not subjective. It must pass the minimum level of checks and balances. If one worked for a newspaper publication, no Editor would allow the publication to pass unless it has been "verified" both legally and evidenced from more than 1 source etc and has met the legal threshold for reporting. So, I leave you to your own ideas but I follow procedural processes.

DYOR. 4 June 2026. Thur, 9:30pm.

FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT:

I am only 1 person on this forum who is a shareholder and I post about the assets RRR has which have been RNS.

I dont think that I am in a position that is "favourable". Why? It is never good to be the only one here vs so many who have their own version of RRR RNS.

So, with that, I take my leave. I am not here for the buns flying 24/7 sometimes.

Banburyboy: The 2nd person to come on after specinvestor99 at me and saying "NEWS". I am going to post my short answer to you. IF THE RRR LITHIUM LICENCES are "IMPAIRED", then prove RRR RNS EVIDENCE by way of a RNS that used the word "IMPAIRED" or from the AUDITOR'S report otherwise it is hearsay 101. Ta Ta. DYOR. Thur, 4 June 2026 at 9:30pm.

Specinvestor 99: You state that I am "navive." I am NOT "naive" but rather I follow legal principles for myself and that is being legally wise 101. You state in your 20:29 , Thur, 4 June 2026 post to me with my name"NEWS": " As proof and evidence which will STAND UP IN A UK COURT, I offer evidence made in this forum as further PROOF and EVIDENCE that Helpful despite his own posted confirmation he is an insider [which is not limited to solely being an officer or director of RRR] the FACT that Helpful is still posting on this forum and therefore it must be CONFIRMED that no UK/AIM has been taken to prevent Helpful from posting."- VERBATIM FROM SPECINVESTOR99 about Helpful to me. All the caps are from specinvestors from what I copied but I can make mistakes in the copying of the caps.

Am I naive as you suggested. CERTAINLY NOT. Why? I dont go round making statements about someone on this forum based on what was posted or said 2nd hand that Helpful said this or that. NO, you are mistaken, there is NO COURT IN THE UK that will hear this case about HELPFUL as there is nothing in civil law to say it can be heard in a UK court and held up per se? LoL. You mix posting on this site with "insider" who is not a director or officer but broaden it. I will not comment further but I CONFIRM THAT I AM NOT JOINING YOU in your assumption that you say you have proof ? IF ANYONE REALLY HAD PROOF, they will not be POSTING DAY AND NIGHT on this forum. HELPFUL HAS THE RIGHT TO POST PER THE RULES and if anyone objects, then take it outside this forum to the right authorities in the UK. Why? We, the shareholders of RRR [dont start jumping on we as it merely means "us" in general] want to hear about RRR and this is what this forum is set up to do per the raison d/etre of this site. I am not going to be drawn in to something that you have NO legal proof per se [OPERATIVE WORD PER SE].

When you have taken action in a UK Court of Law that will uphold your post, then come back and let us know. As for caps, even AI uses DARKENED lettering to emphasise words and it is not shouting as some would postulate.

So, I think specinvestor99, you do what you think is best for you. We, do what is best for us, the shareholders. If you dont want to be part of us shareholders, that is fine. Anyone having gone to schoool will know that we speak for the collective, not the individual if it is for the common good. Why? Many dont want to ask and others have to ask and they take "risks" when they ask on Twitter as it is subject to the algo etc. New rules and all that about replies etc. So, let's say that one has limited replies and I have used up what is reasonably my allocation given by Twitter. Hence, I asked what is the most important asset and if others are interested , they can read what I tweeted and what Chairman Bell replied. To shareholders who ask for all of us, thank you re: Twitter.