Member Info for news

Specinvestor at 15:36, Thur, 4.6.26 addressed to me. I will provide the courtesy of a reply. I quote verbatim: " POSTINGS ON THIS FORUM ON THIS BOARD ARE OF NOT IMPORTANCE TO ANY UK LEGAL AUTHORITY."

May I respectfully DISAGREE definitively by providing PROOF & EVIDENCE : [1] London South East stock forum's site is SUBJECT to the FCA rules. [2] When anyone wants to post, they need to PRESS the icon on the left: "red button: POST MESSAGE" and on the same linear: "red button: CHAT RULES."

Let me quote from this site's chat rules: "Post MISLEADING or FALSE STATEMENTS regarding the share price & PERFORMANCE. Such posts are deemed market abuse, & may be reported to the appropriate authorities." [authorities in plural].

"Post ANY PRIVATE COMMUNICATION, or PART thereof, from ANY person, including from a member of the BOARD of DIRECTORS of a listed co. Such psots cannot be VERIFIED as true and could be deemed to be M I S LE A D I N G."

"The IP ADDRESSES of ALL POSTS are RECORDED to aid in ENFORCING these CONDITIONS." A lot of the rest is also new but one can read it by clicking on the chat rules. So, I provided PROOF & EVIDENCE that this stock forum and at ADVFN do have to comply with the FCA rules which has been further updated from Apr 2026 this yr. CAN ONE SAY I DIDNT READ, I DONT KNOW? Well, once a person presses the "post message" red icon, there is no defence to say, they didnt read as pressing the button means deemed to ....? I trust this clarifies. DYOR

But as I said, THE DRC ARBITRATION is now what shareholders are waiting for.

Dearie me: INSIDE and INSIDER are two different things. LoL. Discussion.

Contd

Blueboy1975: Often on this forum, 1 in particular appears to think HELPFUL is an "INSIDER". If anyone thinks so, they must examine it versus LEGAL REALITY, not what one thinks it is. PROOF? Yes, if one really thinks so, then , they must compile a summary with links to DEFINITIVELY prove this. If one is good at one's law and definitions etc, one will take this proof to the correct authority in the UK. There, IF, it has some merit, it can be FILED under their procedures eg Article ...Whilst many think , we live in a "jungle", the reality is NOT so and PROOF is the cases prosecuted INCLUDING INFLUENCERS which the authorities now have included.

"INSIDE"- if one looks at the legal legality and in particular, NO ONE KNOWS ___when__ the DOCUMENT will be handed down from the Supreme Court[Draft Award already given to RRR in 2024 per Pinsent Mason's article and I recall from RRR RNS as well.] At that VERY MOMENT, yes, it could be

vital information. As for the rest of it, even I looking at the picture of what Chairman Bell posted on Twitter can tell from more knowledge of seeing mines can tell. Trouble is no one does any research on exploration in general or in particular and thinks everything that rolls out of HELPFUL's mouth is ... and have NOT distinguished FACT, OPINION, VIEW , SUMMARY or guess /summation.

So, daily the noise. Today, there are SELLS and the book for today can balance but it does not mean that in general, the synthetic shares have been balanced. That is AWAITED at some time if the RNS etc or any other catalysts falls into place.

I wont tweet to the Chairman on X as it runs "risks" [ordinary ] but I was careful not to have been in any "fault lines" [lets put it that way] of the civil laws etc. Hence, why I could NOT be FOUND in default of any sort. I trust this explains matters. On the right of the chat rules before one can post message on this forum, it also says so about the FCA rules.

Blueboy1975

On ADVFN RRR, 1 was NOT sure that the RRR litigation even EXISTED. Why? It is filed at the domestic DRC courts initially brought by VUP, RRR JV partner. Yes, if one wants to do due diligence, then one has to hire a LAWYER to do a search in the DRC lower courts. Same for probate etc in order to extract the open file lodged at court. However, I discovered the JUS MUNDI filing recently and it stated :"COMMERCIAL", Kinshasa [DRC] and also the Pnesent Mason article dated early 2025 written by the Paris partner of Pinsent Mason. Togther, these form the PROOF and EVIDENCE of RRR plc International Commercial Arbitration , Kinshasa that is independent outside the judicial system in the DRC. Note the operative word: "COMMERCIAL" [International Arbitration and Jus Mundi is a prestigious international arbitration data base. THE DRAFT AWARD HANDED TO RRR IN 2024 FORMS THE LEGAL BASELINE .

Once the judgment is delivered at the Supreme Court, there is no more leeway for appeals etc by VUP even though it should NEVER have been filed in the lower court of DRC but rather at the International Arbitration Commercial Court at Kinshasa.

FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT: I told folks that UK FCA MAR does not allow either co's or individuals to come out with what may be "false" or "misleading" data [note the definition it must qualify]. I am always cognisant of this and therefore, I open my summary WITHOUT A CONCLUSION [I keep that private] . But I do NOT want to GO to Twitter to type this to Chairman Bell if I got the sequence correct so as not to miss any step. IF, what I stated as SEQUENCE of law procedure is wrong and run it past HELPFUL, he can ask Bell. Why? If he is a CLN holder re: RRR or even shareholder, he has more access to the Chairman than myself. It is called CHECKS AND BALANCES.

<>SUPREME COURT OF DRC, KINSHAHA:

2 Courts in play here for RRR plc's case of the 50.1% share in MUSONOI. and the 1st will be: [1] SUPREME COURT OF DRC at Kinshasa will DELIVER the FINAL JUDGMENT. It will then be stamped and sealed to CONCLUDE the DOMESTIC JUDICIAL REVIEW. In hand, Pinsent Mason [witten by the Paris partner] wrote an article about arbitration in Africa in early 2025 and included Red Rock Resources Plc having "RECEIVED THE DRAFT AWARD IN 2024".

<>2nd court: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION COURT [COMMERCIAL SECTION], DRC, KINSHASHA: Once stamped by the Supreme Court of DRC, RRR must present the judgment to the International Arbitration Commercial Court in Kinshasa. THE STAMPING PROCESS: This body evaluates & stamps the award, granting the E X E Q U A T U R [enforcement order] required for COMMERCIAL EXECUTION. [EVIDENCE & PROOF: RRR PLC, FILED AT JUS MUNDI, the international data base. To check, type Red Rock Resources Plc Jus Mundi and it will show this aspect of Commercial Section AS PROOF-EVIDENCE.

3/ ESCROW RELEASE: Once the STAMPED, D U A L stamped documentation is FORMALLY presented, the BUYER'S COUNSEL at ... is legally authorised to execute the millions held in escrow. [Note: As it is norm, the money must go through banking protocols for AML , KYC and so forth ].

CONTEXT: When RRR went into a JV with VUP etc, it was in the documentation that any dispute would be at the International Arbitration Commercial Court at Kinshasa. But VUP took this to the domestic court and RRR took it to the Supreme Court of which is the highest court in the land as it is with any country. So, it was never meant for a domestic court hearing at the lower courts per the signed agreement.

Helpful is in per earlier postings and therefore, subject to an external review of what I said. I know who the buyer's counsel is but better to leave it out for now. DYOR. If wrong , then Helpful can and must correct per procedure as he will know the DRC system of law ie French based.

At HL,it is the above spread. The REAL LIVE quote is tight & again to SELL, is over 0.024p. Time now is 1:10pm, Thur 4 June 2026.

Share price is down -1.96%.

Just means that : PRICE recovered today.

As usual, folks see an RNS about CLN conversion but others step in.

Yeah.

Rolfdavies.

HL also showing 0.025p to sell and 0.027p to buy [Spread].

You show IG the same as HL.

But LIVE to sell is higher than SPREAD.

Wed, 3.6.26

It is 10:30pm at night, Wed, 3 June 2026.

I clicked the GREEN arrow to see how much is the price on the actual page for dealing at HL:

Usually, after the day is over, the MARKET will turn down the SPREAD but 6 hrs since the market closed at 4:30pm, the

price to BUY is 0.027p [Spread].

So, the market has not turned the price down for tomorrow?

Tweet by Doc: "KEN pulled down on LOW VOLUME based on CLN guys who have held for ages, PRICE RECOVERS as any stock they wanted gone went before today. Just my opinion..."- 6 hrs ago.

Tweet by Doc: " Spewed until Jonathan Swann claimed the CLN & says he's firm. See these going back up to 10p sharpish tomorrow. Funny auld game."-5 hrs ago. https://x.com/DDS_DocHoliday, 3.6.26

DYOR. Interesting that FACT there was a sharp recovered & ended 7.875p , down 5.17%. He seems to be nuanced the in the market mechanics?

THE ALGO SYSTEM:

1. It is a very expensive set up to write up the algo system.

2. It is set on PERIMETERS.

3. It is not like big stocks where FED says, 1 word, interest rate UP, the algo works accordingly.

4. RRR is a AIM stock and there is no such minute as note 3.

5. Whatever the NOISE on this forum say, is IRRELEVANT NOW.

6. Why? The noise are the VICTIMS of their own success: RRR is tis and that: CHIEF TOWN CRIER: You watch, PLACING coming weeks ago/months.

7. ALGO, took the stock down from the town crier crying.

8. ALGO doesnt care about what folks now say. Why?

9. THE RRR STOCK SUPPLY IS SHORT and PROOF -EVIDENCE IS TODAY from Google Finance share chart starting 16:01 to 16:30pm , SHARP RISE AND RISE.

10. Any PROOF algo system is working? Yes, 18, 18 , 18 is a sophisticated ALGO testing the depth of the book.

11. Tomorrow: SUPPLY SHOCK OF RRR SHARES and today, it shows just £21,900 share worth bought of RRR SHARES =+27%.

dyor. The also works on distribution statistical model.s

Type into the search engine: "Google Finance RRR share price".

One can see the SHARP rise at 16:05 today, Wed, 3.6.26 at 0.025p. At 6:15pm, the price 0.027.

At 16:25pm, the price is 0.026p.

Then, at 16:30, the price is 0.027p.

THERE IS THE PROOF - EVIDENCE.

Both buy and sell price started jumping and ended +27% per Google Finance.

Same last price on this site of 0.027p.

BELL RINGERS:

1. Happened at REM plc.

2. Everyday, PLACING coming.

3. Placing coming.

4. Same here.

5. NO PLACING PER CHAIRMAN A.B ON STOCKBOX, MON, 2.6.26

6. Why? Cant do a BIG PLACING given RNS issued already.

7. Yes, 0.1p to 0.02p , Indeed . FACT of the share price erosion whilst nothing happened except NOISE.

8. THEORY 101: GAP downs [plural and cascading] and well EQUALLY, GAP UP, CASCADING UPWARDS.

9. Why? NOISE FAILED over PLACING TOWN CRIER - CHAIRMAN OF RRR SAID NO PLACING, MON.3.6.26

10. Today, every buy toward 20 mins to closing time GAP UP, GAP UP =+27% up on £21.900 SHARES BOUGHT.

11. SYNTHETIC STOCKS cant be covered with cheap huge placing shares = SUPPLY SHOCK 101.

12. Tomorrow, more of the same, if today's pattern the same?

UKOG plc [Historical example}:

1.In mid-2017, UKOG plc was languishing at 1p region and heavily shorted and subject to noise who dismissed their Kimmeridge oil discovery as a technical farce.

2. The PLACING ASSUMPTION: UKOG would have to place.

3.Gatwick Gusher breakthru.

4. Wave of buying.

5. MARKET had 0 ACCESS to CHEAP PLACING SHARES.

6.STOCK violently GAPPED UP to 11p.

History. Chief on this forum says for 1 year at least placing coming , again recently, but Chairman of RRR yesterday said NO PLACING shares. DYOR.

SHORT SYNTHETIC POSITION [theory]:

1. To STOP the short postion from going DEEPER, the algo will attempt to move it out of reach.

2. Older CREST DELIVERY failures: Buying brokers can TRIGGER OFFICIAL LSE BUY-IN-NOTICES, the algo risk mitigation module takes over.

3. The system is PROGRAMMED to prioritize SETTLEMENT COMPLIANCE over profit margins.

4. It will go into the market to PHYSICALLY PURCHASE SHARES.

5. Algo automatic BUY BACK will cause a CASCADING EFFECT.

6. Price VOLATILITY picked up by SCANNERS, day-trading ALGOS & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKOUT BOTS across the city.

7.Trapped mkt [short] : stock short.

8. Auction HALT.

9.VOLATILITY AUCTION : 5 mins.

10. LSE will EXTEND AUCTION time.

11> Tomorrow session: Wait and see.

The ways of the algo.?

Step 1: Algo prints synethetic shares.

Step 2: |Negative noise : shares down.

Step 3: Algo records price drop.

Step 4: Algo assumes retail capitulation.

Step 5:Algo loops back to Step 1 & sells more shares.

Step 6: Retail actually keeping stock.

Step 7:Critical Result : Short position created.

Chief here said, next placing coming LoL. Dear Me, NO PLACING shares per RRR Chairman on Stockbox yesterday.

Today, on £21,900 worth of RRR shares BOUGHT, price rises 27% and ends at 0.027p last transaction during last 20 mins ONLY of action [trade].

Heard of the HISTORIC CASE: NEW WORLD OIL and the London Stock Exchange had to step in?

There were NO physical shares to deliver.

On 21 May 2015, Rule 150 came into force.

The LSE stepped in to UNTANGLE the un-settled settlement failure pipeline.

So, today, £21,900 worth of BUYS vs £2.44m mkt cap.

So, the RRR rose 27% and last TRADE was for 0.027p especially during the LAST 20 mins of trading before 4.30pm close.

What happens tomorrow?

MARKET is SHORT OF SHARES & if they cant COVER the synthetic shares issued, they have TO DELIVER SCRIPT.

I dont know how much is SHORT and if the market LOSES control with more buys, then like the oily share, the LSE has to step in.

Happened before as the MARKET MUST DELIVER RRR SCRIPTS 101.

MECHANICS OF THE MARKET:

Recently, there was a small issuance to pay interest etc of some £37,000 much earlier. I NOTICED that it was at MARKET price of 0.021p.

Today, with modest buys, the price KEPT RISING and ended at +27% region and Google Finance showed 0.027p which is the new buy price.

Does this not show that MARKET ACTION started CLOSE to market closing ie 20 mins for the jump UP in price.

THEORY: IF THE MARKET [MM] thinks there is a placing to come, SAY FOR EXAMPLE, they dont need to MARK THE PRICE UP to BUY and raise BUYING price as well. OR if, they can FIND someone to sell them a block and they can hunt round with the big holders 101.

I dont know how you want to view it Banburyboy but it is EVIDENT, that even in buying a property, it has to be FILED and STAMPED before it become legal. This is TRUE of COURT PROBATE etc. So, the article explains it and it is consistent with the RRR RNS and interview. If you dont think so, it is your perogative.