RE: RRR Shareholders forum meeting over, Tues, 18 June 2024.18 Jun 2024 15:36
Blueboy1975 at 13:55, Tues, 18 June 2024: I cite your post directed to me: "News, when you go crying to the NOMAD or whatever, you'll find I am a shareholder. I would then expect a bit of courtesy from yourself." This has to be replied to.
YES, THE NOMAD will be my 1st port of call. Why? Zumore posted AGAIN a day or so ago that RRR DRC potential litigation etc of "$430m" is " L I E S " posted on this forum. This is the 2nd TIME Zumore has said this, but this time, he did not mention who has lied. So, in the drop down window, type RRR and it will also show RRR.GB.PL for Asquis. I have EXTRACTED VERBATIM from the RRR Broker Report ie Clean Tech, 1 RRR final results and 1 RRR Mar 2024 RNS wherein this is mentioned and $430m is stated in the former. So, nothing to do with you surely, unless you are Zumore ?
This does appear to suggest that the NOMAD has NOT checked BEFORE ALLOWING the above RRR RNS's to be issued and therefore, this has to be addressed to the PRINCIPAL ie Nomad. Only then, can we determine whether they have done the normal procedure of seeing counsel's advice relating to the RRR DRC matter as well as the $430m or millions statement in the said RRR RNS. IF THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT PROCEDURE IN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, then what is? To this end, I have contacted the NOMAD once at Solgold when a fund mgr said that Solgold was OVER-VALUED AT £8M at the start of their Cascabel drill. This also falls into the authority of the Nomad. At the time, there were 2 nomads/broker ie one in the UK and one in Australia. The Australian broker replied and told me TO INFORM THE FCA. Why? The fund mgr directed it to me and this matter could NOT be settled on the forum without the authority that decides mkt cap matters. By the way, the NOMAD cannot know that BLUEBOY1975 is a shareholder of not. How can anyone check the register of RRR to find BLUEBOY1975? Impossible. IF, you are a shareholder, then would you be ...your own RRR stock so repeatedly? Why not GO TO A.BELL, CHAIRMAN himself if you are not satisfied and I have never known of any co's RNS has SO MANY INTERPRETATIONS? RNS are by their definition DEFINITIVE and not ambigious in general.?
So, IF you want RESPECT from me, KINDLY DONT PUNTUATE every post to me with "NONSENSE" to ...me. Respect must work BOTH WAYS.
As for "AIMDOGS" the poster at 11:50am today, Tues, 18 June 2024 under the title "NEWS: Difficult to discuss for you AS YOU HAVE NO COMEBACK." If I understand rightly or wrongly, the only way I have NO COMEBACK after 11:50am today is only in the circumstances that I DIE. That is not given to man but to the Good Lord and to this I depend on Gen 12:3 that my life is in his hands, not man's. I trust this clarifies. YES, THERE ARE CORRECT PROCEDURES FOR THOSE who are
trained in the rule of law. SHAREHOLDERS: I have seen 1 complaint on this forum a day or so ago by the constant ...about RRR. Surely, genuine shareholders discuss the stock , share research on the pro