Member Info for news

Lester Piggot as said was born in 1935 and died in 2022. LESTER'S LAST RACE WAS on 5 NOV 1994. He rode thru 1994-95 and that was the last on Zadok in Canberra on 5 Mar 1995. So, Lester has never been in the PUBLIC EYE since 1995, some 28 years ago, Theeeeduke and you say Lester? LoL.

Nike1980 has NOW CONFIRMED THAT POW AND RRR had nothing to do with what ILOVE SUSHI quoted which was paraphrased from a 2nd RNS about TATI IN BOSWANA which has NOTHING TO DO WITH RRR AT ALL. I read page 1 of IloveSushi's profile and this is a trader's strategy with 1 line ? No wonder he got it mixed up?

Theeeeduke

Everyone knows a few simple rules. NEVER BUY 1st thing in the morning AFTER a BIG POSITIVE RNS. Rule 1.

Rule 2, there are periods when the MM's go for lunch and when traders will cash out in general. I see that my other stock is the same at around the same time. SO, HOW DOES THIS PROVE YOUR THESIS.?

CGT is NOT taxed on Gambling ie horses etc as it is deemed to be NOT a skilled game. Hence, stocks are TAXED CGT because it is not gambling without knowledge. Big diff.

Theeeeduke

LoL, so you think stocks are called GAMBLING. If it were so, REVENUE WOULD NOT BE TAXING CGT. In gambling, there is NO CGT. As for Banburyboy quoting Lester Piggot.? Lester Piggot was born on 5 Nov 1935 and DIED on 29 May 2022.

How old is this Banburyboy quoting Lester Piggot. Must be ancient LoL.

King Paul Johnson is counting his assets and doing valuations in handwriting. He was tweeting either last night or today. But Mr Banburyboy who says he is a Chartered Accountant does not rate assets or does valuations. Paul is a Chartered Accountant and has an entry in Linkedin.

Theeeeduke:

It was all over Twitter and I provide 1 link only with the headline: "ASFOORA CONQUERS THE INTERNATIONAL STAGE."

https://twitter.com/RSN927/status/1803082923161297066 dated 18.6.24 with 9,706 views. I can look for more of the headlines but this will suffice.

ILOVESUSHI IS QUOTING "Ominous RNS comment from PoW: " New partner will be fully responsible to FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION and completion of a PROCESSING PLANT and associated mine infrastructure required to produce gold within the licence." POW ISSUED 2 RNS's today and 1 was for POW SALE OF NEW BALLARAT GOLD TO RRR.

The 2nd POW RNS was for TATI GOLD PROJECT, BOSWANA and has NOTHING TO DO WITH RRR AT ALL. I have just called up the PoW Tati RNS of today, 19.6.24 and I CANNOT SEE the above quote by IloveSushi either. Which co is this from? Must be this Sushi chap is posting ON THE WRONG FORUM!!! LoL.

As for Banburyboy, who knows he is from ICAEW?

So, Theeeeduke is playing horses like he does for stocks? Just askin. Ouch for what given I have already told someone I will not average down when asked? Huh, Theeeeduke said that buying and selling RRR today = LOSS OF 20%? The London South East RRR trades in real time shows at 4:28 and 4:29 that buying and selling price was having the 4.5% spread. WHAT PLANT IS ILOVE SUSHI TALKING ABOUT WITH NEW BALLARAT GOLD CORP? Plant? Did the RRR RNS not mention today that exploration plans? That is the 1st steps which has just started and I loveShushi has picked up POW RNS that never stated this for RRR-POW deal nor for Tati either? I think IloveSushi just summarised but that is not verbatim as I cant see it? Wed, 19.8.24 In terms of stocks, Theeeeduke, it is CALLED A HOLDING BASE, so it will now await asset update and developments and it is not like horses ie Ascot wherein put money, 15 mins lose money or collect money. ? I thought it is understood that stock have a longer time frame then 1 day Ascot?

In statistics, Theeeeduke, it must have a BETTER THAN 50% chance to qualify as a "BANKER". In statistics, it does not mean in a field of 10 per your idea. As for ICAEW, it is NOT in Milton Keynes. Here is the LINK to the ICAEW itself at https://www.icaew.com/contact-us/uk-offices

"LONDON: ICAEW Chartered Accountants Hall, Moorgate Place, LONDON EC2R 6EA." ICAEW has international graduates registered with them and they tend to drop in @London HQ. All professional bodies tend to be in LONDON not the surburbs which is harder to reach from the international airports etc.

LoL, Imagine the ICAEW being taught what was told to Richyrich1, it is for the few by the few ?!!! As a ICAEW, per your good self , then you should have by the CODE OF CONDUCT told Richyrich1 about COMPANY LAW MINIORITY HOLDERS and their rights as I quoted. When I said you should have quoted this to Richyrick1, Blueboy1975 said you were at work etc? So, maybe you were told then and then you appeared with the for the few by the few? LoL.

Answer: I do not offer or proffer any. Why? I do not gamble on statistical 50-50%. 1st lesson in stats, throw a coin and the theory is that there is a 50-50% of either heads or tails. That is not a good enough chance, hence it is called GAMBLING. If one picks stocks on this basis, then I am afraid any fund will show one the door if one applied for a post. The top cheese will see they are hiring a chancer who has no ANALYSIS SKILLS.

I have done a quick check on KYPIOS FOR TOMORROW'S ASCOT, said by Theeeeduke to be a " B A N K E R ."" Wah, big call, to call a banker.

On the FORM I c hecked, I will use STOCK ANALYSIS and state that on the basis of DUE DILIGENCE done by me on the form, KYPIOS has only a 50% - 50% chance [Lesson 1 in statistics] and that is the best outcome. I would say that for a BANKER, it has be be MORE THAN 50% CHANGE and a banker is an almost GUARANTEED WIN. It is NOT on my due diligence and I have stated why. So, let us wait folks for the RESULTS AT ASCOT. If you wanted to be a fund horse mgr, it will be SORRY.

To the international crowd, it was a big thing ie Aussie winner won by an Aussie trainer who beat the European set inc British. You say not. So, on RRR, its the same type of thing. Your opinion vs data sets.

It was all over Twitter about the Aussie. I will provide you the link to what the Aussie trainer said and it was also in pics , vids etc. Dwyer said HRH King Charles III wanted to speak to Dwyer, the Australian trainer from BALLARAT BEFORE the RACE started but Dwyer said it will have to wait till AFTER THE RACE, I did not see HRH speaking to any other trainer.

Here is the link to PROOF as A.Bell always wants at https://x.com/RSN927/status/1803229845327151114 19 June 2024 wherein Dwyer lifts the lid over what HRH and he discussed. So, ya see, Theeeeduke, you have your opinion or view and ya think Kypios will be a "BANKER" which is a VERY BIG CALL. That is the same on RRR, you have DECIDED IT IS NOT based on what I am not sure but I have shown on open Twitter and addressed it to Pierre Lassonde, a big investor in SXG Sunday Creek, Rick Rule, Eric Sprott and Newmont, all REAL experts in all things Australian @mining. Why? My work must be judged by those HIGHER than me in statute and it must be assessed and not guess work? Thanks , over and out. Hav ing tea as Nick1980 says often. 19.6.24 Tomorrow then, we will all see your form Theeeeduke on whether KYPIOS YOUR "BANKER" AT ASCOT WILL COME IN OR NOT and it will illustrate your form in general of calls.?

P.S. If Krypios does not COME IN as the BANKER TOMORROW AT ASCOT, 20 June 2024, then it will illustrate how your pick of RGM in the past was also done without methodology.? I checked KRYPIOS 's real world FORM. If you were a horse fund manager, I would not dare invest LoL. Why? I check but let's see.

Theeeeduke,

If your "BANKER Krpios" does not come in tomorrow, then it will be an illustration ...of your form LoL.

And following that, then one may jump to the conclusion that your idea of BANKER is not the same. Why? A banker in racing is almost a "certainty" and "take it to the bank" kinda of thing. Very few people would dare call a Banker. Why? If it does not come in, then, it can be take to mean the form is not 100% banker kinda of thing? This is going to be interesting.😊😊 I have done a QUICK RESEARCH on Krpios for tomorrow's Asocot, Thur, 20 June 2024 and it is on THE HORSE'S REAL FORM.

It is going to be relevant given your form on RRR will be seen by all whether on a horse, you are right to call a banker?

On another forum, they said a poster told them he worked in the NAVY and called his colleagues, STAFF.

The other poster said, the creditability has been shattered as NO ONE IN THE NAVY USES "STAFF" as they are called "CREW."

It is now interesting that we have REACHED THE HEIGHT of posting yesterday and in fact, the posting rules state rather clearly that the ...will be called in by this site kinda of thing.? So, both me and Helpful are now in the eye of the storm ie the RRR shareholders. It is let say, NOT CONVENIENT for me to post research etc on New Ballarat Gold Corp or that it is now worth £13.5m to RRR as they have 100% now. Helpful also quoted from the First Equity valuation as said below. it is standard and norm. Anyone who is familiar would know including Paul Johnson who is doing his sums on the ASSETS and valuation modelling. I tend to do mine but because I am NOT LICENCED by the FCA I never post any adjustments as that is my own cals. I tend to use the broker note as skeleton and do research on every project to see what is the worth etc. I am not sure where all this is leading to but I am pleased it is SEEN TRANSPARENTLY on this forum and on Twitter.

As far as I can see, there is NOTHING ELSE NEXT TO SXG AT SUNDAY CREEK. Why? There are NO OTHER GOLD TOWNS in the DEVONIAN era CORRIDOR and this was confirmed by Dr Nick Cook, President & Geo of Mawson, SXG's parent in his presentation of the corridor of Sunday Creek @SXG, Kilmore-Kimore West and COSTERFIELD and on to FOSTERVILLE.

All the 1 corridor. So, yes, RRR is in a better place than before the buying of Pow's 49.9% in Kilmore-Kimore West. Tier 1 jurisdiction is a better asset. Even POW is going for former gold mines per today's RNS as that is surer than trying to drill and do exploration on a new licence. RRR Kilmore-Kilmore West has two mines during Victorian times @Donnybrook and average grade 142 g/t gold. So, it is following the same path in essence as SXG at Sunday Creek to re-discover the old mine and nearby. In this regard, KILMORE WAS THE 1ST GOLD TOWN and it has to be bigger than Sunday Creek as when the gold ran out, they moved to Sunday Creek. IF one uses logic and reason, why not start at Sunday Creek first? So, quite a lot of data from all sorts of sources eg Heritage, Victorian account per the Victorian papers all concur. Wed, 19.6.24

P.S. I am interested in all things Aussie so hence I saw Asfoora the Australian horse conquering Ascot. I am not interested in smaller races as I only watch these once a year events if I have the time. No, I dont have any tips as I dont tend to gamble. Why gamble? Its like random and not knowing anything like a professional but trying to just punt and one knows where punting leads to just as not researching stocks can be also risky. Researching is not what most folks think. It is to know a particular project inside out with the data ie from previous drills, historic grades, licences, era etc.

Co-Founded: When I tweeted the same data on Sunday Creek & Kilmore & Kilmore West from Heritage Australia Gov AU to A.Bell Chairman of RRR online and to DL plus on the #RRR thread, even A.Bell asked : "WHO IS..."? That will be me. Even A.Bell wants to know. It is a normal procedure. Someone else told Bell online and it was open and transparent for everyone to see both the Question and the Answer. So, yes, who is?? I know you Co-Founded as we are both generally interested in Aussie stocks on the London market or that was where I last saw you.

On the other channel of the RRR forum, one deems it "moron" that if RRR paid £1.5m for 49.9% share of New Ballarat Gold to PoW, it was not spent on anything except the ASSETS and by extension, the pure theory is that it has increased the EV [Enterprise Value]. FEQ, the broker stated that if New Ballarat Gold were to be IPO'ed in London, it would be at £13.5m for the valuation based on peer benchmarks which is norm in the methodology. Theory also teaches that if it went on expenses etc , then it was NOT used to increase the VALUATION, EV or mkt cap. Isnt it wonderful that £1.5m was turned into £13.5m in theory but this is now subject to a UPDATED VALUATION if the Aussie IPO for New Ballarat Gold is announced ? It has to get a NEW VALUATION given Sunday Creek news and potential extension of Sunday Creek into the Kilmore side. Any IPO has to have a VALUATION. Yes, Co-Founded, I am beginning to wonder too. Why? Has anyone heard of someone who is NOT a shareholder saying BUYING AND SELLING RRR TODAY would be a 20% loss? I showed it was only a 4.5% live price spread at 4:28/29 going into closing and the proof is above this page. How especially after the RNS yesterday? The momentum would follow into today and the news was good? Its like the Aussie winner Asfoora BEFORE the race at Ascot and AFTER the Ascot win at the Charles III Group 1 race. All news has reached Australia and it has stunned Australians. Why? An Aussie horse beat a European line up and the caption is "ASFOORA CONQUERS ASCOT." THE VALUATION now for Asfoora after the win will be multiples [serious] both as a horse and for breeding rights. YES, they do valuation on even horses.? All norm. How is all this happening on this forum for months and years?

PoW is indeed pivoting towards the M.E project per their Twitter account or rather this is what was said in recent times?

NO shareholder was asked if they agree or not. One on Twitter told A.Bell, Chairman of RRR that in the future, he wants RRR to ask shareholders permission to pivot to any one project or that is how I understood it? Ooohhh, micro managing the co without the requisite voting power? Ah, must be STOCK MARKET revolution of sorts ? LoL. Back to on topic. It would now be interesting to WATCH both PoW and RRR going their own paths although they appear to be following the same type of trajectory. WHO WILL END UP WITH A BIGGER MKT CAP? Ah, Paul is busy with his handwritten notes of ASSETS. King Paul is busy counting out his ASSETS? King Bell, I dont know as I am not privy. In fact, A.Bell Chairman of RRR asked openly and with transparency who is NEWS given I sent some data to A.Bell & DL and also #RRR. Blueboy1975 said something really funny today about: "...spending DADDY'S MONEY." Ah, there is prejudice I believe in this in Blighty?

If I put on A.Bell's hat to another person on Twitter, I too, would ask: ANY PROOF, please provide? Ya see, it is not easy to convince A.Bell, Chairman of RRR about anything unless one can provide PROOFS, please provide. Why? As I said, with a law degree for Bell , I too would require some proof of how these conclusions are reached. Is it important? Yes, I think so. Why? I recall another resident called Boy tell me, ONE OF YOUR OWN is ....you? LoL, not easy for me to swallow that one. But perhaps it works for those who dont ask further. These months on this forum is more of the same. So, hence, why a lot of time is wasted just answering. VALUATION - try to learn from King Paul, he made it rather big, English understatement and he is teaching so learn to do basic valuation so that one is successful in stocks rather than listening to someone is twisting x or y? Rather too shallow and can only be believed by less than 0.1% of population? Very interesting but I think it is getting rather old now as everything has been answered already and no new cards can now be drawn.

As an example:

PoW's new RNS on Tati just came on to my Twitter feed.

https://twitter.com/PowerMetRes/status/1803391598484509083

It looks like PoW is also going the SAME ROUTE as RRR and PIVOTING TO a small gold operation and the JV partner is a private co. Again, like RRR, they are not going for exploration , drilling etc as in green field but rather BROWNFIELD?

RRR is targeting artisanals in FASO vs PoW at an old mine? As I said the industry moves in the same way.

This is one example of the NEW STYLE TYPE OF RNS. Why? In the past, there is more detail but now it is rather more

compact and does not spell out every dot of the agreement kinda of thing.?

I think today has shown the conclusion of the months of postings on this forum. One can see that postings was about AUTHORITY TO ISSUE at the RRR London AGM on 16 Feb 2024 appeared to turn into ISSUANCE. Big difference in asking for authority and actually issuing. When that didnt transpire, it was on to the next bogey man. On and on it went on for months. Yes, I did come to look a long time ago but left because one could NEVER get anything meaningful except the resident posting his style of unofficial overview. Least but not last was something rather original given I have never seen it in all my years at this site ie HOW DID THE 2 LICENCES AT RRR KILMORE & KILMORE WEST BECOME VALUED at....? Also, it is " L I E S " about the $430m potential international litigation. Who are telling these lies? Yes, I posted that from the RRR Broker Note @Clean Tech , RRR results RNS and RRR Mar 2024 RNS [see RRR.GB.PL for the links]. IF, RRR was telling lies, then so too MUST BE THE LEGAL COUNSEL RRR CONSULTED, and so too by implication , the NOMAD? That is the order of things. This means that the NOMAD must be involved in some sort of FRAUD in theory? On Solgold, one M & A chap said that the Nomad would be deemed to have checked Solgold's documentation. Helpful cals this Nelsonian theory. Can all this be real or are we, shareholders living in an ALTERNATIVE WORLD of ordinary laymen making up the rules contrary to the rule book of the FCA, London Stock Exchange etc? I have answered extensively and this is in line with the rules. Helpful will know the rules as well. That is why, it is always good to have some peers around. So, I can only conclude that after a few short months here on this forum, there is almost a desperation to counter RRR and keep success skewed to something is wrong? I am very sure ALL IS IN ORDER and the $430m is correct and that if ever needed to, the LEGAL COUNSEL RRR consulted will have paperwork as norm to show. I always take paperwork. In the real world of Twitter, A.Bell Chairman asked: "So, what are your PROOFS of intellectual superiority. PLEASE PROVIDE." See I mentioned proof? Apparently, on Twitter, folks understand proof and one showed a screenshot of data in reply to A.Bell. So, here, posts like 20% loss in buying and selling today tells one it cant be correct given LIVE PRICE is never 20% difference. £20 I quoted is 4.5% which is more like it. So, those reading will see that NEW BALLARAT GOLD was bought for £1.5m from PoW but on an old valuation, the 100% if IPO'ed is £13.5m without the Sunday Creek news and extension to Sunday Creek. I got taken aback that it was so bad yesterday that in replying to placing or something like that elicited something rather more serious than norm? What sort of world are we living in? My parent always gave right of reply with proof? Here, the rule is he must be obeyed and do not ever expressed data. Even A.Bell wants PROOF and that is norm as he trained in law.

There you are, London South East showing LIVE PRICE BOUGHT was 0.044p at 4:28pm and LIVE SOLD price was 0.0424p at 4:29pm. So, example of buying 1,000,000 RRR shares would be £440. To sell, 1,000,000 would be 0.0420p which would be £420. So, difference is £20 between buying and selling immediately is NOT 20% difference surely?

Live prices which I tested right up to the last min of closing time was NEVER , EVER 0.05p. 0.05p was the PRICE OF THE SPREAD for buying. In fact, the spread for sell was 0.04p but it was higher than that. IN FACT, THE SPREAD WAS TIGHT.

I will wait a few more minutes and one can CHECK from the page above and see LIVE SELLING AND BUYING and that will be the DEFINITIVE PROOF that it was not as you say, Theeeeduke of BUYING IS 0.05P AND THEREFORE 20% DOWN IF BOUGHT TODAY. Please check given you are NOT a shareholder and therefore you are not checking live price but rather taking SPREAD to be LIVE prices.? 19.6.24

Theeeeduke

DOWN BY 20% - new investors who bought today? How? I was testing LIVE PRICES right up to the last second of closing time. Since you are NOT a shareholder, you did not tell but possibly assumed that SPREAD is actually LIVE PRICES? Ah, I note the QUALIFICATION you used ie "MOST". If you look at RRR website, there is a vast array of brokers who did the notes. I am having eye strain and therefore, I have not been able to CHECK through all or the financials or interview relating to the A$20m I was looking for. IT IS MY VIEW, that paid or not, the brokers have qualified and LICENCED staff doing the valuation. It is also presumed that they are QUALIFIED and experienced and I say presume is because the unqualified are not allowed to do valuations. As for the other comment about 1.8p kinda of thing, I and Helpful MENTIONED specifically the VALUATION OF THE NEW BALLARAT GOLD CORP if it were to IPO based only BEMCHMARKS of that sector. It is also my view, that there is a PRESUMPTION that the VALUATION done even IF paid is to be done in a professional way ie accessed a/c to known methodology. Yes, No. IF YOU ARE A MERCHANT BANKER OR INVESTMENT BANKER, I DO NOT NEED TO TELL YOU THAT ALL BROKER FIRMS LICENCED are deemed to be professional in their cals and they followed known methodology ie PEER valuation benchmarks, value in the ground, M & A prices or NPV. There is not much room for any wild cals and hence, the VARIANCE is not in any way off 1 firm vs another firm. All commonly known. ALL known.

Banburyboy did not state he came from the ACCA. Answer.