Member Info for news

Yes , Helpful, I can agree with your analysis. However, this is my style. I would like RRR to produce some CASH FLOW from FASO which is enough to pay for the admin & expenses. This is not going to be easy in the initial stages due to scaling up takes time. I dont expect much or want P/E's and all that. Why? I am not after an income producing co.

I am here for the BIG payout? Like what? Like DRC which would fill the TREASURY sufficiently for the short term of US$10m before expenses. IF I not found SUNDAY CREEK GOLD or New Ballarat Gold for Kilmore & Kilmore West, I may have run off. Why? I am looking for the BIG RE-RATE. Can only happen IF RRR gets to keep as much of New Ballarat Gold as possible. If, NBGC was 1 of many licences surrounding SXG Sunday Creek, then I would also not be bothered. Why? If there are licences to North, South , East and West of SXG, then again it will depend on whether the mineralisation extends AND TO WHAT EXTENT? I want a tighter moat of all the ticks in place. Since the general consensus of the SXG crowd is that they have NO OTHER HIGH GRADE in their licence except Rising Sun and the CEO said mineralisation is going West, then he may KNOW or suspect as a Geo, the potential DEPOSIT/s lie over the BOUNDARY. DL understands exploration very well and he said the lads will HEAD TO THE BOUNDARY TO DO THEIR GEO THING. Dont waste time doing the rig marole but get straight to digging a DEEP hole to get the sample tested by XRF. That way, no expensive work but 1 quick litmus test. So, this is what I am waiting to hear next and whether THE IPO is coming or not.

Like most CEO's , they too are not KING MIDAS as in their lifetime, they have few strikes like Cascabel, Havierons of this world. Mr Bell had Mt Ida but it was not hematite iron ore but rather magnetite which needs big capital. That was what RRR was formed with this asset in the main per the admission document.

Musoni was the 2nd one. Now, the 3rd potential. The rest are a side show in my opinion but I am open to being surprised.

Ideally, all projects that will not make the cut should be spun out etc in some way so that the vehicle is much simpler and has better clarity.

I have never met Mr Bell and it is important to know the Chairman ie his vision and how he intends to fulfil it. I know the DL style given I read everything, every interview, every co and I like his style of doing things quickly. He replied within mins, not days or weeks. He can drill like a beaver and he keeps the mkt informed. I think Mr Bell is good at PROPERTY. How do I know? In checking the various co's at Companies House, I note the addresses and I think Mr Bell knows how to leverage and knows location, location well. So, if he ran a global property portfolio, I would be more confident going on his FORM I have seen on open file.

I am trying to find a CEO that will build a Fortescue but none so far on the London market bar one and it may or may not happen. Why? This is not Gina wh

JKF8

That is a more reasonable attitude.

If you want "concrete" news to jump into this stock, then in theory, this stock does not appear to meet the strict criteria.

A trader wants a quick in and quick out on the "spike" per your terminology. If you have NOT noticed, that spike has to be that almost every man & his dog gets in so that it meets the volume criteria. Look around as those days are long gone of the "spike" on "concrete news" and this is common to many stocks. Only 1 exception: THOSE WHO HAVE HIT A TIER 1 POTENTIAL RESOURCE and that will also be rather drawn out given drilling takes time. Any examples? Yes, GGP & Solgold, EEE, XTR but that took a much longer time frame than a "spike". It WENT TO MULTIPLES. So, you may now realise that I am not here for the so called spike. Why? I dont put in big capital because all AIM tiddlers carry a higher risk profile vs say Unilever an FT100 stock. Only big capital will make the requisite return. Like how? In theory, a input of say £100k and clear 10% after commission etc = £10,000. But in such stocks, the AIM resource stocks dont trade £100,000 to be able to get out due to LIQUIDITY. That is the principle and one will note for this reason, there no BIG TRADERS in this stock. Also, there is NO BIG BOARD for RRR here which lends to my thesis that trading is not suitable for the "spike." What is the point in making £100 max on a capital of £1,000 if its hard to sell and it turns down when all the traders rush out first? But if one is looking at MULTIPLE potential, then even a £250 is O.K as a base. Look at the trades ---WHY TWO 449 TRADES of 20p region value transaction and 1 trade, 494? What's this new fangle coding of buying 20p worth of shares. Even the commission will come to more than that? Puzzled. My ideal which has not been found on AIM London. Twiggy had a stock which ran into metallurgical issues. It went almost bust and one chap held on to this penny stock. Tiwiggy went on to form Fortescue which became a major in its own right and mkt cap into billions. Not many can achieve this as it would take many long years. None that I have seen on the London market but I think one may have the pre-requisite if they can get over the native issue.

Thank you Nike1980 but I gather from what I read on this forum that the resident is only interested in this stock and not a shareholder in any meaningful way so how come the bevy of naysayers only and they do not find me, Helpful convenient to them? Question to be asked and I also gather Mr Bell is also interested ? I was not here but that is what I picked up.

So much so, that now I am asked to ring the Jockey? This includes Helpful. Hmm, why? One for POIROT, the TV show.

The poster : AimDogs has returned today to this forum and posts exclusively ONLY on RRR [Red Rock Resources on London South East]. The Link : https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/aimdogs/

On this forum, RRR ie Red Rock Resources of London South East AimDogs posted to me: " Header: Re: News: DIFFICULT TO DISCUSS FOR YOU NEWS ==========AS YOU HAVE NO C O M E B A C K." Dated 18 June 2024 at 11:50.

One for my archive in case I need to recall the exact verbatim. AimDogs specialises in X days to funding. It has now past 3 days and no funding RNS [news] from RRR.

Just checked JFK8 's profile. Hmm - ONLY POSTS ON RRR.

Too many on this forum posting ONLY ON RRR and 1 sided only and 1 liners. Hmm!!

On Hotcopper, one contacted them to complain about using caps and HC told the person: Look here, we are running this site OK. That is not outside the rules if someone doesnt know they can use darkened print and there is the facility.

Mine is 2 today JFK8.

Stats: If I am answering 6 persons, that is 6x for me, and 1 for each one of them.

Chat Rules: Any restrictions, please check. Answer: NONE.

Many forums: STOCK IS DEAD. Why? The naysayers have WON - no one is posting and no one is selling or buyer as all potential customers dont know what it is about. Once naysayers take hold, no one listens to any other voice except 1 voice. Here, there are fact checkers. Done want to read ? London South East Head of Admin told me years ago, just FILTER, thank you. If AIMDogs had to ...post that comment to me, it means that is the ..of last resort. Why? Does it involve money given all are NOT shareholders of RRR? Hope that clarifies.

Blueboy1975 also stated yesterday that the Resident here is WORKING or on HOLIDAY. But the resident himself said he was in KPMG yonks ago or that was what he implied by long in the tooth. That is NOW CONFIRMED by the Resident in my earlier post below. So, HOW DOES BLUEBOY1975 know where or what the RESIDENT here is doing or working? How? So, the junior text book style gave out the info to provide a cover for his absence. So much so, the resident says he wont be posting much as he is on a cycling holiday but WILL BE LOOKING IN? WHAT FOR given he has NO SHARES IN RRR so the $36,000 question is WHO IS THE PRINCIPAL of the resident? Ah, that remains to be answered but NOT my remit as that is the concern of RRR. Even A.Bell wants to know on open Twitter who I am and he asked the Question and it was answered by someone else. Going back to horses and why statistics is important - if there are 2 horses running, it is a 50%-50% chance based on Lesson 1 of stats. But the field is 10 and therefore if there are at least 3 contenders, it cannot technically be a BANKER given the horse Kyrios has been injured last yr and does not run on all weather terrain. Also, last race won was in 2022. As for the Aussie horse, it is in form, and the talk is the American Breeders Cup next. So, form, ground, statistics etc are the requisite criteria. Here at RRR, it is about the RESOURCES but this is IGNORED so how can this stock be analysed just on whether it has £5 in the bank only sort of thing. I wonder if the jockey on this forum is aware how many of the big betting firms make some £40m a year using statistics alone and Maths PhD's form Oxford.? All well known that their systems are all based on statistics. Race is on for 4.20 this afternoon per the Jockey here so let's see his skill outside RRR and he think if he picks a winner, he is qualified to be a stock expert here at RRR? The skill is NOT transferable.

The resident has a PR dept here to promote what I am not sure. No, I was not l uckyas I dont believe in luck. No, the resident didnt save me, let me confirm. I run through assets and usually, there is only 1 asset to research. I dont like anything outside the Tier 1 jurisdiction normally. I dont specialise in Canadian resource either & the reason is that one has to know the terrain very well. Like how? Like in Ireland, some of those deposit potentials are in pods and not in a continuous porphyry. On RRR, I just like the risk reward but the timeframe is a much longer one now and funding strategy is one to note. I am not privy as to the standing of the community to this stock so that is the only qualification. I qualify by saying some have the standing to raise sort of thing. There is hardly any stock now that meets the criteria that I have seen thus far but I am looking. Here, the strategy has changed & pivoting to early cash generation in FASO. So, in essence a portfolio vs single drill project. As for the Chartered A/c per his own statement, everyone must accordingly see if that is the case because that is the basis of his own expertise on all things RRR. On balance, the jury is out as all things of the compliance nature involving Company Law seems to be not present? I see a link to RICK RULE to be interviewed by Stock Box which is not the usual so I gather Rick Rule has come to Britain shores. Rick Rule knows RESOURCE in particular vs the accountant here does not understand resource from what he posts nor his PR dept. Why PR? Blueboy1975 knew YESTERDAY before anyone else that the Resident is on hol and today, he says himself he is on a bicycling holiday and not posting much BUT LOOKING IN.? Huh? On holiday and looking in when he is NOT invested? Huh, the NOMAD and the broker are not sufficient and needs oversight. I say!!!. I dont have a PR dept nor do I offer PR for anyone else here. In fact, no one is sure who anyone is but if they cite they are X or Y, EVERYONE on this site then assesses them on the little giveaways whether it is correct or not. Like who? Like the JOCKEY who won 20 times here. If Kyrios doesnt come in today at the Gold Cup @Ascot and he says is a "BANKER", then no offence but even in that sector of his expertise he says since 14 needs to be questioned as to whether HORSE RACING is A TRANSFERABLE SKILL to STOCK ANALYSIS. So, in closing, NO RESOURCE INVESTMENT BANK will take in anyone who says they are accountants and know very little about resource in general or in particular. This is the final analysis of this forum from me. However, it now helps me to decipher all forums in stocks going by this forum of the classes here and some resort to ...? Hmm. Going back to Kryrios, the horse has NOT won since 2022 and last yr the horse suffered an injury. I also believe it likes soft ground and today, the weather forecast is for firmer and sunny conditions. In contention is also another horse from a well known yard and 2-3 others.

From the SGE. https://twitter.com/Nostre_damus/status/1803596254229963006 20.6.24.

Bodes well for the next update from RRR as to the next news on 100% RRR Ballarat Gold Corp and potential IPO.

I will mention this to Theeeeduke. Kyrios which Theeeeduke , a jockey with 20 wins says will be the "BANKER IN TOMORROW'S GOLD CUP AT ASCOT" is the favourite LoL. K Y P I O S which Theeeeduke said will win is 10/11 and was the 2022 winner.

I think the confirmed no of runners is 10. There are 2 more contenders for the Ascot Gold Cup tomorrow namely TRAWLERMAN 7 to 1. COLTRANE 12 to 1 and GREGORY 5 to 1, open to improvement.

My Analysis using statistics:

At best it is statistically a 50-50% chance but certainly NOT A BANKER. Why? For a banker it must be better than 50% in general. WHAT IS THE HISTORICAL STATISTICS for the FAVOURITE TO WIN THE GOLD CUP AT ASCOT? The answer is " in 94 RUNNINGS, 32 FAVOURITES HAVE WON ie 34%."

To look at FORM , it is not a certainty given last win was 2 years ago for THEEEEDUKE'S PICK OF KYRIOS THE 6-5 FAVOURITE.

So, our Theeeeduke is basing his jockey profession to qualify to be an type of expert in RRR and stocks? Well, IF GOLDMAN SACHS OR SP ANGEL WILL HIRE THEEEEDUKE WITH 20 WINS AT HORSES PER HIS ACCOUNT ONLY, then I will say, let Goldman try to put a jockey with people's PENSION MONEY. Many of the funds are scared of the gambling types ie those who take big punts like how people punt on horses. So, Theeeduke tells us he is a jockey from this, he is an type of expert in stocks like RRR? Oh Well, I am sure A. Bell should now know the convo on this forum. Why? Theeeeduke range Bell to say he lost in Bell stock? Well, what can I say?

I am told that many on this forum NEVER INVESTED in RRR but rather legacy holders of RGM which has nothing to do with RRR ie the assets. It has been a very fruitful night of convo with THEEEDUKE, a jockey per his account on this forum late tonight when the mkts are closed and no one here. Theeeeduke himself revealed without being asked that he is 43 years old. All jockeys know that for any loss be, it in horses, stocks, one knows that there are NO GUARANTEES and it is gambling unless one is skilled in stocks, as in qualified and experienced in that sector. It is unusual for anyone aged 43 yrs old, a jockey that does not know that one wins and one loses at be it horses or poker as Duke mentioned himself.

SO, LOOKING AT THIS FORUM'S COMPOSITION, it is a no wonder that NONE are qualified in Business Finance and the rest of it which is the pre-requisite that one must know before getting into stocks. Especially, one must be good AT understanding geology , grades, metallurgy etc if one wants to invest in RESOURCE STOCKS. But here, this forum is made up of a bevy of people who are LEGACY holders, some say but they are "disgruntled" per the resident due to RRR.

Most of all , one must know the rules of the game ie formal rules and also have skill in VALUATION. So, with due respect, that unless folks here are ANALYSTS with experience in the top mining investment houses, then they have invested without the requisite skills, qual and experience. However, I note Maidit308 is rather familiar with valuations and this per Maid has been gleaned from many years in the stock market and round the rodeo many times LoL. I think I recall Maid said he had some 25 years of experience.

Well, Paul Johnson bought RRR when he was working and only had some £12,000+ in savings and from that investment in RRR it went to his first "fortune". Fortune is what is quite a lot of money to each person's idea of fortune. Paul said RRR went from 0.25p to 23p and Align Research said RRR went from 1p to 25p. So, at the time, the assets must have been the cornerstone of its success. So, yes, it is on ASSETS.

I think, for me, it has been an EYE OPENER. Why? I now finally realise that those who lost in x or y either got in at the wrong time or sat until it returned to mean. As I said, a mining analyst was interviewed specially on this site and she warned that in a commodity downturn and bear market, junior explorers CAN LOSE up to 90%+ and that is from statistics. So, I viewed the video as it was on the top of every forum and one cannot say that this site did not help everyone out.

So, I will now take it easy and I wonder what Mr Bell will now say if he is told of the convo tonight on this forum and the conclusions? After all, Mr Bell was a mining analyst and he knows the SAME RULES of the stock market in junior stocks as many of us do. Interesting. With that, it does show. As they say, it is best one sticks to something one is good at rather than try stock picking et

FORM.

Next? I am really pleased we had this convo, Theeeeduke. Why? Now we know your methodology akin to horse racing and poker. LoL. No wonder and I think A.Bell would be interested to hear your profession. Why? Well, a horse racing chap buying RGM and today CPX as if they were horses for the X, Y or Z race. Stocks are not like that. So, you yourself will come to realise in time and all of us on this forum will also know why. Same goes for everyone else on the forum and RRR. So, this convo has been very fruitful to show that folks who bought RGM did so like as if it was a horse race? My word!!

FORM.

So, Theeeduke, you come from a racing fam and you tip KRYRIOS TOMORROW FOR ASCOT AS A "BANKER." BIG CALL given a banker is a guaranteed win. But in reality, nothing is guaranteed. So, tomorrow, we folks here will watch and see if Kyrios comes in and given you are in racing, on to your 20th winner, that is even more stunning. Sorry, I would invest in your racing fund if you started one. Why? Well, I think it is obvious that calling a horse a banker shows a not so conservative person. In stocks, one has to use caution and be more conservative as norm.

Hmm, tomorrow then.

So, you grew up in a racing family. SEE, my analysis is good. Why? At 14, no one would have the money to go to races etc.

Lester Piggot raced quite a lot of the time in HK at one stage and he was not seen much in the UK as you know. See, I can construct that it is NOT plausible for any layman to be into horse racing at 14. Now, for Asfoora, that is the horse making a name. Why? It beat all the UK horses Group 1. As you must know, Asfoora from BALLARAT , AUSTRALIA is NOT a GROUP 1 HORSE BUT GROUP 2 IN AUSTRALIA. Asfoora is also NOT THE TOP 10 ranked horse in Australia. So, to win like that from the back is a stunner. So, you didnt think much but HRH King Charles III wanted to meet Dwyer BEFORE the race even and Dwyer has now put out a voice video on what they spoke about. Ya see, if one is to believe all that you say given this is a forum and nothing can be verified, then, on the basis of what you said, I would NOT say, I would rate you as an EXPERT STOCK PICKER WITH FORM. Why? A racing man and stocks ---they are not compatible. AS FOR MILTON KEYNES, the international crowd wont want nor like a suburb address and this is true of ALL PROFESSIONAL BODIES. Hope that clarifies. Racing and STOCKS are not the same. He nce, why poker and horses are more more closely akin as both are NOT SUBJECT TO CGT and called gambling per the taxman. Hope that clarifies. Pleased you gave us all your 14 year old and Lester to which I could do further analysis. Nothing wrong but from a racing fam does not make anyone a candidate to work in Goldman Sachs as a ranked and rated analyst and this is fact.

If I was 14, I would have been given a good hiding for horse racing and all that by my Gramps. Never mind, Lester Piggot. So, at 14, you were on to Lester Piggot? I say.

No disrespect Theeeduke, but I think that it is now 11.40pm and I am bright and alert. I just had BLACK TEA with Dandelion added ie natural.

So, its best that we call it a night and speak when you have more than ....talking ....down time. Thank you.

Theeeeduke

You made money at POKER. Maybe, that is plausible.

Poker is also not a very skilled game. I wont spell out what I think the skill is.

However, you told A.Bell, Chairman of RRR that you put YOUR HOUSE ETC on RRR.

Helpful said that Bell said, what, are you mad?

Apparently, on this forum recently, you told us all of which Helpful was here that you put in £500?

I say.

Theeeeduke,

You said you are 43?

So, 43 in the year 2024.

Lester Piggot last rode in Mar 1995 when that was his LAST PUBLIC APPEARENCE IN CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA.

Lester Piggot was born in 1935 and died in 2022.

So, Theeeeduke, in 2022, you were 41 and Lester would have been 89 years old if he had not died in 2022.

You were BORN in 1981 [2024 minus 43].

So, you were 14 years old when Lester LAST RODE IN A RACE IN CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA which would not have been televised in the UK. Lester rides in HK but even that is not televised.

I say!!!

I decided to stay in for the NBGC Theeeeduke and my time frame is much longer. So, with a base, I am fully versed, thank you. I dont think MATHS is your strongest point?

Lester Piggot as said was born in 1935 and died in 2022. LESTER'S LAST RACE WAS on 5 NOV 1994. He rode thru 1994-95 and that was the last on Zadok in Canberra on 5 Mar 1995. So, Lester has never been in the PUBLIC EYE since 1995, some 28 years ago, Theeeeduke and you say Lester? LoL.

Nike1980 has NOW CONFIRMED THAT POW AND RRR had nothing to do with what ILOVE SUSHI quoted which was paraphrased from a 2nd RNS about TATI IN BOSWANA which has NOTHING TO DO WITH RRR AT ALL. I read page 1 of IloveSushi's profile and this is a trader's strategy with 1 line ? No wonder he got it mixed up?