Member Info for Mumbo_Jumbo

What’s the end game here?

Why monkey!! There are many ftse companies up 100 percent or close to it in q4.

Close to a billion shares will be sold in the next 4 months in RMS. Unless it pulls a rabbit with big orders of masks out of the bag, it’s now stuck at this level or below.

It was on the cards. The company is now free ride for for the BOD. Millions made with share sale, and now fat salaries secured for another year or so. Well done them.

Never get emotionally attached to a share.

With greatest respect Eva, wind yourself back in. Do tell us what bit coin is then, and how it’s being used.

Are you accepting bitcoins in your cafe? Have you any plans anytime soon?

It could also be back down to $1. Such is the nature of Bitcoin plays.

I can never invest in something I don’t believe in. For me, it’s just a new way to whiten money in a digital age.

Gold play?

Rather abrupt upsticks. Any reason?

1509 - please tell me you have a really low average. And it would be a crying shame if you ended up not making the money you wanted whereas others who traded it making a packet on your tip.

These breathability tests should have been done at the outset. It’s a basic hurdle that any design has to pass at the outset before it’s even put forward as a commercial product.

beesty69 - I don't believe I have ever commented on BRH board. 0dtt, is the board I most comment on and there are good people on there who are invested in this, some quite heavily. Today is probably the most I have commented on in a share, purely because it just happen to catch my attention as it was a midday RNS and I am amased that this is till going on AIM and people are still getting away get away with it.

Many many years ago... the same thing happen to me in Provexis.

honestopinion and ironhide,

Before you invested, were you aware that the mask that was being touted had not passed breathability tests? And assumed all was good to go and just a matter of getting it manufactured and fulfill orders?

pingu - yes it is a failure. Its been touted as 5 ply. why wasn't the mask tested before the hype? Could well be that these issues were known to them along (hence it wasn't subjected to breathability test before) whilst getting you in Love with Cave and pumping money here and they were dumping their holdings. They are not coming back here with their money!

abrooking - why wasn't the 5 ply subjected to these breathability tests before the hype? Surely you only tout designs you know will pass the breathability test. That is the most basic hurdle it needs to overcome. And it has failed at that.

I can design a mask with layers of plastic bags, and I can assure it will be effective. But only downside is that I cant breathe through it. Exaggerated example yes, but you get my point.

A mask is no good unless you can breathe through it!

It means this company has no value now from the mask side. Why wasn't the mask subjected to breathability tests before? I am not personally invested but I assumed this was already done. How many people knew this before investing? I suspect not many. They were far too in love with Dr Cave when it was being pumped.

This why you can never be emotionally attached to any share and particular in AIM.

I am told this was always a 5 ply design mask and all the efficacy figures are based around that. The fact that you cant breath through it with 2 different designs means its the end of the line for the mask that current mcap is built around.

Now its for the company to explain why the switcharoo 4 ply is as efficacious and value proposition has not changed.

Thats a disaster then if all the value proposition and efficacy was based on 5 ply.

I presume they tried two 5 ply designs first and both failed the breathability test. Then moved down to 4 ply to get the mask design passed.

Many thanks for the info... There is still lot of upside here to catch up to the mcap prior pandemic!

At the end of your isolation or during it... you could have flipped a coin for whether you are infected or not as that's about the accuracy rate of these mass tests.

50% false positive rate!! and misses atleast 30% of high viral load cases.

The fact is these "mass tests" are a complete waste of public resources and end up doing more harm than good.

MMD,

Any idea how do their efficacy figures get impacted by going from 5 to 4 ply?

4 ply passed and 5 ply failed.... how does that affect value proposition now?

1509

Rms owns entirety of p2f?