George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
how ridiculous. shorting didn’t make this company’s share price sink like a stone. neither did they force shareholders to sell. nope, the only thing that did that was the forward selling of 160m shares. if ‘shorters’ knew or suspected that to be happening, then they just took advantage of the market headwinds. let’s face it, we all knew after the first 24 hours **** was going down. even then i think the sp was still at 4.5p, if my memory serves me well. you could’ve all shorted this stock, but you didn’t. why? because your bet is on the share price going up. so when hemo starts to rise again, are you going to sign a petition to stop people going long? no didn’t think so.
and if this share reaches 20 or 30p, will you not sell any of your shares because of the immorality of making a profit from saving people’s lives….? nah, didn’t think so.
some of you just need to stfu, lick your wounds and carry on. my views are known on vs but i do see sunshine in mordor and soon, the shortest will be ****ed! you make your play, you take your chances. nobody to blame but yourself.
ideas; i agree, it’s a welcome rns. however, during this whole process we’ve been led to believe that the decision to award the esia would be taken at ministerial level. not once through this whole charade were we told that ministers would/could just knock it back to the local level. clearly graham clarke has not got a ******* scooby doo about what’s going on.
Mrs India: it’s blatantly obvious that the choice to keep schtum, is borne of the necessity to not incriminate themselves. What would they say that wouldn’t get torn to pieces under the most minimal of examination? Vlad isn’t to be trusted. The only comfort that I see as a pi is that they’re now limited to issuing ‘only’ 60-70m more shares over the next twelve months. There are of course two ways out of this restriction; cancel the listing on the main market and move to AIM or, they produce a prospectus. Either of those would of course be big massive flashing red lights to private investors.
The email may well be genuine, however the content is far from sincere. The profit made by the capital raising company is distant from whatever sector the company trades. If Vlad/Hemo had allowed the share price to climb post CH lift, then the placing would’ve been at a higher price and the Capital raising company would’ve still got their 100% or more profit. There’s only one reason to raise at the time of the CH lift AND at this level, and that’s to purposefully dilute existing shareholders. No more, no less!
Not sure if they’ll allow a full web link but it’s on the FCA website. Some light bedtime reading for you;
https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/primary-market/pmb-30-technical-note-exemptions-requirement-produce-prospectus.pdf
if hemo issue more than 20% of dilution within the next 12 months, they would need to produce a prospectus. so none of the shady **** that we’ve just seen and what happens on aim. producing a prospectus is public and investors can decide what they want to do;
a) 20% exemption
under the prospectus regulation (p reg), issuers who are admitting securities fungible with securities already admitted to trading on the same regulated market that represent less than 20% of the number of securities already admitted to trading on the same regulated market, are exempt from the requirement to produce a prospectus (which relates only to admission to trading on a regulated market but not to public offers). the 20% limit is applied over a rolling 12-month period. as such, any securities admitted over the previous 12 months not covered by any other exemption, would count towards the 20%, except as provided otherwise by the p reg.
Only by what posters have stated recently, Hemo can only issue 80m more shares over the next twelve months., to avoid the 20% limit. If they leave the main market and move to AIM, then that’s a warning sign we should all take notice of.
Vlad is not ‘sincere’. Good god man, you’ve been here years, a lot more than I have, and you still can’t see it. I’m not emotional. My average here is less than the current s.p. Like most people should have, when those half million sells started popping up on the day of the CH RNS it was obvious what was happening and I sold a big chunk. Stu may well have known the RNS was going to be today but he didn’t four weeks ago, but he knew there was a raise coming, and he told you. I knew there was a raise coming because of the selling pattern and because I don’t trust Vlad, and I told you. Yet you chose to ignore the warnings. That’s not Stu’s fault, or the shorters, traders or anyone else fault.
JHFH…you’re kidding, right? Vlad didn’t succumb yesterday. He’d succumbed, if indeed he had and is just not also culpable in this whole crooked saga, before the CH was lifted. Why do you think millions upon millions of shares were forward sold on the actual day of the CH lift RNS? Why do you think they continued to be sold down into the twos up to yesterday?
1. Stu is not to blame. He’d been warning us of a placing for weeks, just like he did before the last fundraising. Those who tried to discredit him are more culpable.
2. Vlad is a chancer and has no conceivable empathy for p.is. We all know this. You ignored this at your peril
3. The millions upon millions of shares forward sold should have been a lighthouse on the rocks for everyone. Again, if you ignored that, it’s nobody else’s fault but your own.
4. Never trust a single word that Vlad writes, says or intimates. His behaviour in any other occupation would have him labelled as crooked. I know this is the same as ‘2’ but it needs saying again.