RE: matt1 Dec 2015 11:37
But I'm still confused as to your point. if you're saying that the management will woefully imprudent and try and boost perceived earnings which would then not be consistent with real cash flow I'd understand you, but your earlier posts seem to imply the opposite, ie they'll be too prudent, which for me, isn't such a bad thing, and if they've already done this, then the stock is cheaper than we think!
On a related point , I realize that your (sole?) focus tends to be on free cash flow, which for a mature business makes sense. However, for a growth business (and I realize we can debate whether Vislink is one!) you actually want a company to be reinvesting cash flow back into the business/making acquisitions etc which necessary means FCF is low - I really don't have a problem with this. Better that they reinvest at a superior ROCE than give it out as dividends. That said, I note the VLK did actually raise it's divi this year which seems a fairly confident statement from the management on CFs?