Member Info for mathsprof

Loss over year reported as £1.45m. Cash raised in November was £0.85m - ie 7 months worth of losses. Not surprising we had another raise in June - £0.78m - this should last another 6 months or so. At least there's a further £0.92m in the bank - ie a further 7.5 months cushion.

So we have 6 months to sort out a deal, or for Sierra to come up with progress on the 737 front before the next cash call might come. Still a hold and wait for me.

The error changes 3800000 to 3880000 - relatively minor in fact. It makes no difference when this is reported - I suspect it was only noticed the next day.
It will not have affected anyone's feelings about what the share is worth, or made any difference to the overall level of trading, yesterday or today.
Strange though that the negative trade, but not the restated positive one is not on this site.

No. not paranoid, blind perhaps. Thee is a corrected trade of 3880000 timed one second later.
So no murky plot, just reporting error.

Potnak - I thought the same. The 10q is somewhat arbitrary, and I can see it might give some pressure to get things sorted in advance of it's release.

q-10s in the past have been issued on the 8th or 9th. Don't expect one earlier. Next Thursday most likely IMHO.

Or perhaps just fuse? The red and blue reporting is just a con, anyway.
I am determined to be unconfused. (which incidentally is in the dictionary.)

A simple tweak of the reporting software to take account of the time stamp would get rid of these anomalies. But I suspect no-one wants to unconfuse the simple punters. (Is unconfuse a proper english word? disconfuse??)

not being kept from us - they would probably be unaware of them too!

Website saga continues - directors' holdings updated and now correct (0.7%), but other errors still remain.
I suppose we shouldn't be surprised of the lack of understanding of the implications of the EHGO deal if the company can't even get the details on their own website correct.

Oh dear! What a dreadful webpage!
Why did I just get my calculator out?

Monecor percentage is calculated incorrectly.
Directors' percentage is not updated from previous total.
As for the percentage not in public hands. Still 10.36% - where does this come from???

No, "the principle place of business" is a quote from the paragraph on their website telling us the number of shares in issue!

Further to our discussion last Wednesday (and the error being pointed out to them), Valirx website is now updated with the correct number of shares (1024m).
However the principle place of business remains in the UK.

Trouble is that they never RNSed their holding in the first place (this time). So no need to tell us they're out. But then, the 121m shares are not yet officially acknowledged on the Valirx website.

Here's the (double) trade some of us have been waiting for - 4 928 571. The odd part of EHGO holding. I'm now pretty sure they are out completely.
It also confirms my suspicion that the double trades are somehow the same shares reported twice, either two separate trades or something I don't understand about the nature of reporting single protected trades ("t trades").
Anyway, I also now suspect there will be gentle upward pressure on the SP until the next RNS.
Strong buy - but only for the calculating, mad or desperate!

So is it simply an error on the Valirx website that the 121m hasn't been added in? The AGM was finished by the time the RNS was issued.

I've just checked valirx website and they show 903.

but this is the last EHGO RNS:

London, UK., 28 June 2019: ValiRx Plc (AIM: VAL), the clinical stage biotechnology company, announces that further to the announcement dated 25 June 2019 in relation to the conditional termination of the entire Subscription Agreement with the European High Growth Opportunities SF (the "Investor"), the Company has issued 121,428,571 new ordinary shares at a price of 0.175 pence per ordinary share ("Investor Shares"), as agreed between the Company and the Investor in connection with the termination of the Subscription Agreement.

The Investor Shares will rank pari passu in all respects with the existing ordinary shares of the Company. Application has been made to the London Stock Exchange for the Investor Shares to be admitted to trading on AIM. Admission of the Investor Shares is expected to occur on or around 3 July 2019 ("Admission"). In accordance with the arrangements agreed between the Company and the Investor, termination of the entire Subscription Agreement will occur upon both Admission and the Investor Shares being credited to the Investor's nominated CREST account in connection with Admission.

Following Admission, the Company's enlarged issued share capital will comprise 1,024,057,953 ordinary shares of 0.1p each with voting rights. The Company does not hold any shares in treasury. This figure of 1,024,057,953 may be used by shareholders in the Company as the denominator for the calculations by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change in their interest in, the share capital of the Company under the FCA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules.

I thought there were now 1024m shares in issue. That would make the Monecor holding almost exactly 5%.

T is the code, like O or UT or NT etc.

Hover over the i button on the first of the 2 trades, and you can read its a non protected portfolio single protected trasaction. The other one is marked as ordinary. That'a what I mean by a t-trade.

The other thing that puzzled me about the paired t-trade sells is that the total amount came to approximately twice the number of shares that EHGO held.

If this is to happen again, then we need to see 242m ie 2x121m trades.

This begs the question of what the second half of each pair actually means.