Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
COPL?? Absolutely laughable. HE1 are currently sitting upon the largest helium discovery in the world, science backed by decades of research from top scientists at Oxford University who are also one of the top institutions in the world.
Will you just stop .... YOU are the very person that was ramping this share to the extreme and actively encouraging people to buy 'ten bags' nonsense up until the literal suspension whereby many unfortunate people were consequently spiked at 0.2. Now you are scaremongering. Were you born with zero conscience or integrity or did greed just take you there?
Absolutely inside info, lets be frank her husband supposedly did not know? Perhaps an odd pair of Jimmy Choos might slip past a husband's radar but hundreds of thousands of shares ... I think not.
Mount Sunai school of medicine now own 14.2% approx 25 million shares as of 26th April. Clearly great confidence in Renalytix and for roll out of the tests. Whilst recent SP has been disappointing and volatile I am certainly holding ....
Approval imminent under US government for Insurance companies to provide the test to 10 million susceptible patients and at Β£950 a test well the figures speak for themselves.
Firstly a sterling effort of monumental proportions by CAG ... goodness talk about taking on Goliath, as a holder who has lost a great deal of money thank you π
I personally wish to accept my losses and to a degree (hindsight) with the way things played out in the last six months my own error of judgement.
Hope and reality can be very different animals but equally as wounding.
Thank you Cag for all that you have done for all, however for me personally whipping the dead horse is for me neither feeding hope to the bereft.
How about something positive and how we can learn from this mistake? All Aim shares are notoriously risky, however each one of us must have had 'that' doubtful moment, I had several.
Shall we share those as a learning curve to each other?
Best
Goodness me Toffers such hypocrisy after your Superdry antics.
No one was insulting you here or any of the others you mentioned, however many had had enough of the repeated negativity and the condescending way in which it was delivered. Every morning the people mentioned began with their self righteous we know it all posts ... relentlessly.
As you also did on Superdry ...relentlessly.
No board should be literally taken over by the opinions of one or two individuals. We all as investors make our own decisions, sometimes we get it right and you of all people Toffers know that sometimes one gets it wrong.
No raise justifies the months people had to endure of said peoples endless posts as indeed to potential takeover of Superdry justified your endless posts.
There is at the bottom a price equiv. to .66 which could be very good news ....
A document named as a prospectus was lodged with NAsdaq on five days ago just prior to the weekend (17th April). Placement 'AD' shares are under ticker RTNXF it comes up in conjuction with our usual ticker.
It is quite a document to wade through I have been reading it for three hours. I have no idea why it was not registered here only in so far as within that document there are several statements which provide that basically only US corporate law namely Delaware law will be adhered to?
Could some others wade through the same document and share their thoughts please as a very heavy read indeed and I am not sure what to make of it at all.
I think that is unfair. All AIM STOCKS are small companies and that is what you are investing in. FTSE 100 perhaps would suit you better? Bio like exploration companies need to raise money in order to progess. I am sorry that you bought in at a higher rate, if you have held them then with Unilever on board hopefully it wont be long until you see a return π€
I could not agree more, someone had to finally say it as it is. Self righteous and arrogant, may I personally add the word sanctimonious.
Far from imparting his supposed vast knowledge in a way that would be considered, friendly and helpful it is imparted in a thoroughly patronising way. This discussion board was in essence completely taken over, I have no idea to this day why someone not invested in a share would spend so much time on it's discussion board. As for his Older's flying monkey Scot - well both are cut from the same cloth.
We all value information however the frequency and tone of deliverance has been as you rightly say completely disruptive to the harmony of this board.