Fantastic RNS this morning. New venture with a world leading graphene technology (nobody else in the world is doing what Ionic are doing).
More sales outlets confirmed AND purchase orders arriving, i.e. actual sales. Don't forget that Mucker said there would be NO more sales while the Tesla legal action was ongoing...BZZZTTT....WRONG!
Incredible that all this is going on while employees are leaving the company and CPX are filing for administration. PS mucker....also sarcastic! Enjoy your weekend, looking to see what other nonsense you come up with...not.
Mucker the instis have sold none today.
That was the point of iwgrod's post, ie sarcastic.
You said they were going to sell 100m by the end of today.
Utter nonsense Isas.
This is the strangest placing I've seen in my time in the markets. Screw the existing shareholders and the company doesn't even get any money from it. Shocking.
Here, here. Increasing revenues and earnings, less than 12 months to cash positive. Circa £2m worth of IPv4 addresses on the books.
The company will have several options. I'm expecting a combination of refinancing, pay down and possibly some conversion.
Also worth noting MXC converted for fair value over at Tialis. Fair vale here is 2p.
Mucker you just don't listen or do your own research do you. I've told you a thousand times the patents have expired and the caee is to claim unpaid PAST royalties.
so the case is still active as of yesterday which shows what a total ****** mucker is.
Cont...
For CAP-XX: Stefanie Allinson, Paralegal Shannon Hamlin, Paralegal Richard Hobbs, Prevail Trial Consultants Martin (Marty) Zinkel, Prevail Trial Consultants Alex Bylik, Client Representative and Witness Mike Taylor, Client Representative and Witness Dr. David Zuckerbrod, Witness Gregory Pinsonneault, Witness 1 Listing an individual as a “witness” does not imply or require either party to call such individual to testify or make such individual available to testify at trial.
3 For Maxwell: Patrick Edelin, Paralegal Ann Vermeersch, Paralegal Christina Rivituso, Paralegal Susana Ricardo, Paralegal Gerald Hines, Technology Consultant Ian Andryszak,Technology Consultant Josh Gomez, Technology Consultant Paul Margulies, Client Representative Krista Carter, Client Representative Jeff Bouchard, Client Representative, Witness Priya Bendale, Client Representative, Witness Louis Hruska, Witness Carrie Distler, Witness
One of them is locked, but here is the other one:
MOTION FOR EXEMPTION OF PERSONS FROM THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE’S MAY 15, 2023 STANDING ORDER ON PERSONAL DEVICES Plaintiff CAP-XX, Ltd. (“CAP-XX”) and Defendant Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (“Maxwell”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby move for an order to exempt certain persons from the District of Delaware’s May 15, 2023 Standing Order on Procedures Regarding the Possession and Use of Cameras and Personal Electronic Devices by Visitors to the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building and United States Courthouse (the “May 15 Standing Order”). In support of this Motion, the Parties state as follows: 1.The District of Delaware’s May 15, 2023 Standing Order provides procedures to regulate the possession and use of personal electronic devices by visitors to the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building and United States Courthouse, which require inter alia, for visitors to place personal electronic devices in a locked pouch provided by U.S. Marshals. Paragraph 4 of the May 15, 2023 Standing Order provides for certain exemptions to the Standing Order. 2.An approximately 5-day jury trial is scheduled in this case for December 11-15, 2023 in Courtroom 6D. 3. Courtroom setup for the jury trial is scheduled for December 8, 2023. 4. The following staff, representatives, trial consultants, and witnesses1intend to appear at courtroom setup and/or the jury trial, require access to their electronic devices, but do not meet the exemptions listed in Paragraph 4 of the May 15, 2023 Standing Order:
Cont...
Are you serious? This share will never get to £1
Yes and Miton have also been offloading some of their other small caps recently, so nothing sinister.
So pleased you've come round to our way of thinking mucker - come here gimme a hug ya big softy :-)
Mucker has realised he is spectacularly wrong and is trying to back track now. Trying to make out he's the one who predicts a settlement after we've been saying for weeks and months CAP-XX will win.
How are PIs being played if it's going to 8p, lol. If that's being played then thank you very much indeed!
I've already invested a lot more at 0.9p.
Mucker scenario 2) = admin.
How will the sp go to 8p if they are in administration.
2) Out of court settlement in next 2 weeks => Cap-xx rolls over => Maxwell pays derisory $2m settlement & agrees to nominal licence fee arrangement going forward => Tesla continues its separate legal action => Cap-xx 2024 sales suffer significantly as a result => Cap-xx employees start to depart => Cap-xx goes into administration by Summer 2024
Lol, mucker now predicting am 1100% rise in share price. Only a week ago he was convinced the company would be going imto admin. What an absolute w**k*r.
Some large sells going through the last few days but the price is holding up well. Could they somehow be the share buy backs?
Lamald, one is an actual shareholding, the other is a spread bet.
Actual shares you can vote with at AGMs, but you can't vote with spread bet shares.
Essentially CAP-XX and Maxwell are arguing over fine tuning of the wording of scientific terminology in terms of the 'upper limit' of the FOM (Figure of Merit). The FOM is central to the patents.
I assume you mean you're here because you wanted advice on deciding to invest here. However from the 6 point scenario you posted previously the only point worth investing on is point 6, which you have excluded. In your words:
"Guess you're trying to hoodwink the gullible here that you think a 6) Wobble"
The only possible way you could invest is if point 6 plays out, and yet you are saying people are gullible for believing in that scenario (the correct scenario in my opinion). You'll be too late to invest by then anyway.