The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
Couldn't resist a small top up, and it ticked up just after so good timing!
£5m market cap is priced for failure when there is so much happening behind the scenes.
"The Company is undertaking a full evaluation of the way it analyses and reports its sales pipeline in order to ensure that all nominated opportunities are rigorously evaluated and to ensure a realistic probability of conversion of the orderbook to firm schedules within the short to medium term. This process will be completed before the end of the current calendar year (2023)."
I'm expectung an RNS on the above any day now.
My 3 predictions for this year :
1) The debt will be refinanced, removing this uncertainty
2) The company will move to profitability
3) The share price will re-rate much higher
We all know CPX were chasing historic royalties, I'm not quite sure why we're arguing about this.
Targa is simply pointing out that since 1915 no patent has been overturned for failing to name the inventor, and in a similar case to this one the Federal court overturned the decision on appeal.
No but they did own them during the time period they were alleged to be infringed. They would have to prove we didn't own them in that period also
That's good news thanks Targa, in this case I'm happy to be proved wrong :)
This is also very interesting, it's a long read but very insightful in light of the trial and what could happen next.
https://openstax.org/books/introduction-intellectual-property/pages/2-7-post-trial-procedures
Also:
https://www.appealslawgroup.com/appeals-attorney/post-trial-motions/
Clutching at straws? I don't know but it's all of got to hang on to:
"Judges usually show substantial deference to juries. If you lose at trial as a result of an apparent error, you can file a post-trial motion to correct the error. You might file a motion for a new trial based on an error in the jury verdict."
This judgment shall have the effect of denying as moot all other pending motions made by the parties pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The judgment is subject to modification following the Court’s consideration of the parties’ post-trial motions. The deadline for any party to move for costs and attorney’s fees (including under 35 U.S.C. § 285) is extended to within fourteen days after the time for appeal has expired or within fourteen days after issuance of the mandate from the appellate court, and no party shall file any such motion before that time.
What does it all mean...who knows. Will Tesla be mean enough to file for fees...probbaly. Will CPX appeal??
Yes good news indeed and a nice RNS to start the holidays with. Much more to come next year by the looks of it.
It was asked in a round about way at the last investor meetings - how would CAP-XX deliver potential huge sales volumes from Epishine, E-Peas and the like. They said that they fully expect to be able to meet demand.
Also there is an RNS 12-18 months ago outlining CPX collaboration with Epishine.
More good news for Cap-XX. For new holders - Epishine uses CPX supercaps in their solar cell tech. When this tech take off it could drive huge sales numbers.
https://www.onio.com/news/onio-and-epishine-alliance.html
With confidence returning to the market we could even exceed expectations with a strong H2.
Agree L1on, also we will soon hear from Lars on the sales pipeline which will give visibility beyond 12 months, so we should then also see better broker forecasts based on the new metrics.
1msn do you think it should be higher?
I guess if AK had been as proactive as Lars, they wouldn't have had so much trouble with the patents and gaining credibility.
CAP-XX coming out fighting...this sounds very promising. If we can forget about the court disappointment things will be a lot brighter in 18 months time. I've been in since 2016, what's another 18 months!
"Last week, our CEO Lars Stegmann spent two days in Montreal, Canada, meeting with C2MI, CMC Microsystems, and Centech Mtl.
The meetings were a huge success and an opportunity for Lars to learn more about business incorporation processes. This will allow CAP-XX Limited to access and benefit from all programs, enabling us to fully integrate into Quebec’s innovative and forward-thinking tech ecosystem.
We want to thank Harold Mzobe from Invest Quebec | Investissement Québec International for providing Lars with useful insights into Quebec’s capabilities. It has shown us the tremendous potential for CAP-XX Limited to effectively establish an R&D center and production operations in the city, as well as how to build a strong client and partner network in the NAFTA region."
Ioxus was by default, CDE caved in and signed the license.
Don't forget AVX, TDK, Murata and Panasonic all signed a license for the same two patents. So CAP-XX certainly were not trying to overstretch themsevles. TDK, AVX and Murata are giant corporations too.
As Newuncle says, something doesn't add up, so hopefully more clarification in the not too distant future.
Targa I was responding to this:
"...someone or tesla waltzing in and getting a separate agreement with that person(s) so we end up with nothing."
The patents expired 4 years ago so it's meaningless for someone to step in. The patents are in the public domain so anyone can use them now without 'stepping in'.
The court case was to collect historic royalties from Maxwell while the patents were still active.