Member Info for maestro1

Listen guys, revision application deadline is early march. The company has implied they have new facts because they are thinking of revision application, so it would be silly to let the other side know what we are doing a month early. Let's wait on...

The Company expects to be able to finalize its position in regard to seeking revision and / or annulment of this Award by 31 January 2017. The Company expects to be in a position to finalize its advice to shareholders by 28 February 2017. _------------ Its advice, so it will be up to us?

The Company expects to be in a position to finalize its advice to shareholders by 28 February 2017. _--------------- Advice or are they gonna do appeal...

:-)

If annulment fails it maybe that our last resort will be to sue for damages as roi insider was involved, I mean if these auto signature docs were not norm at the time someone must have noticed these licenses when they moved from various dept? Chl were not involved in the fraud, yet they lose everything and even their $70m investment, roi allegedly had insider involved in this scam and the get to keep this billions of dollar asset with no punishment. It doesn't work like that. Imho

Its a possibility, since they would be able to get loads of shares on the cheap. Its not certain. Don't forget insider was involved and roi will be liable for him.

if like you say we have no money i dont think we will relist. Lets just wait till tuesday. :-)

So you think 1p with MKT cap of just 1.5m, don't forget large holders own over 50%. Roi friendly would love to buy many at 1p just to close this case. It won't go that low.

Of course there will be a hit, share price will only recover IF we win appeal. Depending how good is the update, but I think 10p is reasonable at the moment, MKT cap of 15m. I'm in for the end now, will not sell for pennies. Chl invested significant amount, I can guarantee 100% that if chl found nothing their never would have been dispute with license. Its as if it was all preplanned... Make the western company explore for coal, if something found cry foul....

Well not long till the update for going forward, i do hope they give us a detailed update and what they think of the award, the new facts which the company claims to have, i hope they release those to us aswell.

mr jay You are correct, chl brought a case against roi to icsid for the illegal revocation of exploitation licences, the roi came up with this argument that past licenses are tainted with forgery, so the first claim chl were the claimant and when roi brought a new case then roi became claimant, this would imply that roi would have to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, yet the tribunal agreed to flexible and hear evidence on balance of probability. This is imho the mistake icsid made in law. Roi cunningly provided only documents that proved their case and failed to provide docs which chl/icsid requested. I truly believe autopen signatures would be on docs belonging to other license holders, roi refused to provide these and icsid agreed as burdensome. If those other docs proved your narrative, wont you have provided them to icsid? This case is really fishy..

bad article, for a start chl hasn't given anyone a bribe, nor has roi or icisid proved that a bribe has been given. CHL can make a better case that Noor took a bribe, rather than ridlatama/chl giving a bribe to roi officials.

bad article

"London-listed mining company whose coal mining licences were revoked after its Indonesian business partner had forged the documents has had its compensation claim for U.S.$1.3bn against the Indonesian government thrown out by an international tribunal." Yet all ridlatama officials have been officially cleared by the police, what a farce this verdict concluded with selective evidence.

Single-user subscription, one year | $1,199 i will pass, what about you. :-)

rebel do you have the full article? Fregatr There will be an appeal, i can guarantee that. We invested $70m thats the starting point one can assume,

edit: opinion. :-)

If the appeal(s) fail then its over not before then! Everyone is entitled to an opinions....

we are expecting an update by next Tuesday to tell us what route we will take, whether we do a interpretation application, revision application, annulment application or all 3 applications. This will be known by next Tuesday, i think this will resume trading again very soon once stay of cost is in place.

Falstaff Wait till the 31st Jan, I'm sure the company has thought of something. Company believe the verdict is TOTALLY wrong, so do I. I trust DQ...