Member Info for Luckybob23

"Also, the rampers tend to collaborate to remove posts about Syme that they don't like (Peak admitted to this)"

Erm, no he never you crazy liar. He got his own post removed. Stop lying

+17.5%

"In parallel, we continue to progress our own traditional funding routes which remains strategic for our business model".

Can you explain what the 3 steps back are in this statement?

Lol will do RB

In an ideal world I'll be back in OB.
But I've got a fair old chunk of work to do on this house first . Good job I've plenty of experience in that department but materials still cost money :)

Oh the irony

Thanks OB.

I wish everyone here all the best, its been a good crowd this last couple of years and I have a fondness for this BB and it's regulars, the ones who are still using the same profiles at least, especially you and rightback.

I'll be following along and cheering from the sidelines.

Yeah me!
Started buying at 3.5 p, had average of 7p by the time I stopped buying , never sold when nick announced he was going to on here at 66p( a Thursday if I recall)
Following Monday results published and in came some supposed experts pulling the RNS to pieces , blood bath followed.
Sold my original stake at 46p, same at 35p and again in high 20s. Kept the rest until a couple of week ago when I sold nearly all my investments to buy a house. Get the keys next week hopefully.

So yeah, in profit, Val paid for all my portfolio.
May well buy back in one day.

I happen to think Suzy is a good ceo, replied to every email I ever sent in a timely fashion.
I also think all those calling for her head are nothing more than dodgy traders.
This isn't the premier league. She's done what she can to minimise expenditure, change paths to make a viable company. One that's not run by a snake.
So so what if the deals delayed .

Makes me laugh reading some of the people who've praised her so highly while the SP is on the rise suddenly turn around and demand her resignation.

It spells it out for you Mr Smith.
Not a massive financial transaction but still a first for tradeflow in EUA.

It's a possitive step forward not a multi million pound transaction.

Deluded Castle? I'm not the one posting here day I and out twisting every possible thing into a negative and making himself look stupid doing so.

I said the price is where its at because we haven't IMd when the company expected to.

The things you listed, would not have been needed had we IMd when expected.
So put simply we would not have dropped 86% if we had.
It's stating a simple obvious fact .

God your an idiot

No lube, the lack of IM for the last 18 month is what's caused the drop. Its that simple.

LeChameleon, I'll offer you some advice.

Never ask a bunch of anonymous people for advice on your investment decisions. Especially on LSE.

"They don’t have any clients. That’s the problem"

Of course they have clients Ed, how the hèll do you think they have been able to recognise any revenue.
They haven't serviced those clients, but they are still clients who've paid up front fees for DD and are awaiting IM.

Why does it matter where they are?
Do you rely on other people's opinion to sway your own?

Yes drutor , there will be dilution. But just because a company applies for X amount doesn't mean it will all be used. Its called covering your bases for worst case scenario.

Rosie, can you demonstrate Wiggys lack of moral compass please. You know, like Burnley keeps demonstrating yours.
ie, by showing what a hypocrite you are by spending all your time posting here while previously slating other posters on other BBs for doing the same thing.

In your opinion should shareholders not point out your obvious hypocrisy? Do you personally think its just fine?

What your doing on a daily basis is the definition of trolling, you can dress it up how you like, you can deflect by screaming deflection all you like, but everyone reading can see what your doing. Your only fooling yourself.

If someone's being paid her me to distract from the companies failings I'd suggest it's you and a few others, after all when the trolls aren't trolling the rest of us actual shareholders can actual discuss the issues, without twisting facts or putting spin on it.

Why are you, lube, so bothered?
Nobody can control what other people say, so if sine idiot wants to take the mick out of a minority its on them to look the fool and not a representation of all shareholders which is what you and Castle are trying to suggest.
Just in the exact way people complaining about rampers all day when it's like 2 people who don't represent most of us who still bother to post here.
But if you want to continue making yourself look an idiot then carry on.

OBviously AH would be a great addition.