Member Info for Luckybob23

"You seem very agitated most of the time though."

Really? You truly are so detached from reality aren't you?
It's comical now.

Keep digging your hole Rosie.
It's like you can't even see yourself doing it .

It's a tragically sad existence

And how much would his 10m shares be worth without raising funds via dilution?

Or how much would his 10m shares be worth if syme monetise 500m in inventory ?

Why are you even going on about someone else's paper loss if its not to antagonise him or other shareholders?

Do you remember that brief time when us shareholders could actually debate the company situation Peak?
When the trolls fùcked off for a few week.
Had some good discussions.

It's pretty spooky how obsessive the trolls are.
One of them claims to have infiltrated a private investors group and even went to lengths of faking a shareholding to do so. For what exactly? To report comments back to other trolls ?
Bit sick in the head going to those lengths and certainly dubious in charector.

Well that doesn't even make sense simple jack

Honestly don't even know how you've got the brass balls to still post after making claims of insider knowledge to ramp and then flipping your script pontiac.

Get a hobby or a dog or a wife then Castle.
This boards the first thing you think about when you wake up, even kn a bank holiday.
As the great B A Baracus once said
"I pity the fool"

Who are these legitimate analysts you mentalists?
What are they analysing on a start up who've not started their main business concept?
Obviously they are not the same people who told you that inside info you were claiming to have on your first post?

Interesting that you can't tell the difference between one poster, who's always said he's not selling a single share and the rest of us.
Like I said before , several times, you just can't help twist things to suit your narrative.

How's those positive RNS you claimed to have insider knowledge about coming along Pontiac ?
Why the sudden switch of position?

"Parm was an extreme ramper and abuser, he's still ramping on Telegram."

No he wasn't Calamari, not even close to being a ramper.
He never ramped or mislead ever! He may well of been possitive . He certainly got frawn into abusive arguments.

Name them all then Rosie.
You keep doing the same thing, referring to people here as rampers , tarring everyone with the same brush , it's a couple of people who do not represent the majority.

There's more trolling derampers than there are misleading rampers!
There's a lot more genuine people reacting badly to trolls than there are rampers or derampers

They've taken an extension allowed by the current rules.
Who knows why, perhaps to buy them a little more time to get first IM put or just to secure the finance they've just announced.
They are allowed to do it so they have.
If companies were suspended for being loss making half my portfolio, miners and pharmaceuticals would be suspended. But they aren't are they.

Well this is what I mean when I say you like to twist things Rosie.

Parm never ramped anything, after the first year of listening to trolls he may have been drawn into the odd abusive remark unfortunately. But ramp he did not.

LSEking just offered comedy catchphrases. Annoying as it was , still not ramping .

At the end of the day when genuine people (like Parm, havoc, Burnley Steve ect )are faced daily with lying hypocritical trolls stating opinion as fact they are going to react like normal hard working folks do, which is what most genuine people are.

Your already trying to spread FUD with the idea the accounts won't get signed off? But why wouldn't they.
We've made little income, most from DD fees from customers already reported , minus the ones who needed to be refunded, then there will be something from TF , then the rest Is outgoing which will be higher than income.
It's not complicated , it will be loss making , but we've secured finance to cover us , regardless of if that's negative to the SP it's still not complicated or dodgy. So why would the auditors not sign the accounts off and lead to suspension? No reason at all! It's all just FUD from the mouths of BS artist hypocrites and trolls who only post to give their sad little lives some delusion of importance.

"I highlighted the boiler-roomers on Hurricane yeah. Very similar posting styles to some rampers on here: abusive and posting in abusive terms about people rather than anything about the reality of the RNSs and the (in that situation) legal case."

Think youl find that it's the people who never rise to the bait or get abusive and constantly try to spin at every opportunity that are paid to frequent these board and create both buys and sells so market makers can earn their money. Most of this site aren't real people, unless they are all retired and I wouldn't be able to find a real retired person willing to spend all day posting waffle on a share board.

Those who get abusive, even if it's annoying are more likely real people who invested their cash and get hot headed about the trolling .

So I put it to you Rosie, this site is the boiler room and you are one of many of its employees.
Way to earn a living.

The explanation will come Emerson, if it washes is another story.

"I did, he said the RNS is a big positive"

Sorry, are you saying you emailed AZ and he told you the RNS was positive???

Why would anything else kill the company?

We already know the accounts aren't going to be great.

I never said it did affect the SP , but it gives a few people good motive to spend all weekend posting nonsense on a BB