Member Info for Luckybob23

I wouldn't call it disgraceful ramping, it's other people taking soundbites from interviews and going on and on making them into taglines.

Where AZ has messed up IMO is misleading deadlines and not being clear about why those have not come about.
It leaves a sour taste and now there's no trust from the market.

Seemed to bring up marlana for no apparent reason a few times like the last profile too.
Burner accounts ey wiggly. Strange people on here.

Of course they are not 100s of thousands down! Jeez...
Yep these folks put 100s of thousands into a start up and yet some of them don't even know what ordinary share price means.
Walter mitty investors all over LSE.

"ex, I wouldn't take anything that Burnley says too seriously. He's already admitted that his role is to 'mark' posters - looks like you have joined his list. "

Your ability to twist things and not see how blindingly obvious it Is to the reader is staggering Rosie.

You know full well that's not what Burnley meant when he posted, but yet again twisted his words to fit your crazy theory.

There isn't any missing money lubricant.

And as for hype, people seem to get confused with bulletin boards BS artists like ST and actual relevant information dished out by the BOD .

For someone who's been invested in ALBA many years you don't seem to understand how exploration companies operate or how long it takes to actually prove up an area to declare a viable mine.

Mms dropped the price, in come the crowd we saw today, not the regulars, the "I've just sold this dog" (even though I've never commented before today) crowd.
Then they buy and that's how easy it is to create liquidity.
Scummy trading 101 class!

Puts a stop to the "zero liquidity " BS though ey.

And Holly, your the only one trying to push that theory.
IM occurs when they monetise the first tranch of inventory.
No company is going to pay 15k to go through DD without running the whole process past several accountants eyes .

But you keep going on with your "don't buy any shares because I want the price to fall further" nonsense.

Decimate into oblivion?? Really.

Of course shareholders will vote for so no chance of insolvency is there!

So dramatic Rosie.

Why not celebrate by NOT TALKING ABOUT THEM AT ALL!

Rosie, referring to individuals as anything other than their username is an attempt to goad .
Constantly repeating someone's losses and doing the math is nothing more than goading.
Calling people gerbils or mug punters or bag holders is goading.
Saying stupid things like living in your head rent free is goading.
Constantly repeating the same thing over and over and over every day, regardless of the subject is goading.

I could go on and pluck examples from people post history but I don't need to do I. Because it's blatantly obvious.

It's a shame but since lse is a free site it relies on advertising and as such traffic. So it goes on and on as long as you play the system.

But we probably would be having a better discussion about the share if you lot weren't continually goading, taunting and trolling this board with your bs excuses.
Such as..
I've got an interest in CLNs
I've got an interest in fintechs
I've opened a short just to justify posting here..

All of which are real statements made by some of you which nobody in their right mind would believe.

At the end of the day, nobody wants to discuss their investment choice with a bunch of one sided word twisting people who are clearly at every opportunity trying to get under normal peoples skin.

Again, we are all aware of the facts. There isn't much to discuss.
But seemingly you won't be happy until every shareholder says "I'm selling",

For most of us who've been here a long while we've listened as 7 people cry every day about rampers, 2-3 rampers at best , but yet make out that everyone is a ramper..
News flash, there's more ramping going on on most other popular boards many of which have diluted and consolidated over and over for multiple years.
But according to you lot if you don't scream negative one sided tripe every day then your a ramper. Or if you dislike one sided tripe your a ramper.
And you think anyone reading this board from the sidelines cant see through your nonsense??
Give Joe public some credit.

I haven't given up all hope, far from it.
But we need real reasons why we went from multiple funders to one funder and why non of those funds have come to light, because that's what seems to be the issue despite what AZ says.

It's going to be a slower recovery given we've gone from over a billion of inventory in the pipeline to 150m or whatever it is now. Let's hope that "snowball effect" happens , but non the less it's a smaller snowball to start with it seems!

When they start fulfilling promises made and prove to the market IM works and show growth .

Which roughly translates to ..
We expect X,Y and Z and if we don't get it we're a bit foòked .
Which is common sense really.

Until all is secured there's obviously risk .

Well it's accounts so even if it was on self imposed time I would expect anything. Can't withhold thee most important bit of info to date.

Don't see a moral hazard at all, the concept is not designed to fool anyone, it's designed to create working capital, to bring funds in quicker for products that have an existing pipeline and the DD covers the existence of that flow of inventory via various performance markers .
The DD will also cover value turbulence and risk of inventory becoming obsolete in the short space of time its on the platform. Then there's additional insurance on top of the 15% buffer. It's in the clients interest to sell that inventory to get maximum profit. They are not ebay sellers trying to push last years rubber ducks.

I won't talk about accounting standards because I'm not qualified to do so.

Thing is, why do we need a new strategy?

What are you on about ?

Don't invest in junior mining companies if you don't know how long it takes to get thing up to the point of actually mining.
This isn't gold rush and GF ain't Todd Hoffman

Makes for an interesting read.
Of course SYME are aimed at SMEs due to the lack of funding available to many of them from the large banks.
Utilising a deeper look at their accounts and their flow of inventory to make a decision rather than a computer says no situation.
Greensill have sure helped show the problems that can occur if the correct due diligence is not carried out.