Member Info for lordloadsoflolly

Spantrout - agreed "It is possible they see it in their interest to hold some if there is gonna be a big price appreciation".

No-one knows what Lanstead's strategy is. Regardless of what Peterpharma - or anyone else - says.

The only thing we DO know is that as of 22nd May 2025, they're holding 3.14% less of the company than they were before.

Samsmith.1800 - According to the share chart, IMM’s been rubbish for over FIVE years:

2.67 GBX -13.43 (-83.44%) past 5 years

Move on.

I don’t think you can read too much into Lanstead’s sales either way.

If they’re retaining more than the smoothed monthly average, that COULD signify heavier selling ahead.

Equally though, it could mean they feel they’re better off holding more shares for longer, as they’ll be worth more in the future….

To answer Juno's question: Bo.

Samsmith.1800 - hasn't exactly worked so far.

Share Price: 9.25 Bid: 9.00 Ask: 9.50 Change: -0.09 (-0.96%)

Dogofashare - sure you're on the right BB?

We're talking IMM here, right?

PS: Jan 23 to May 25 does NOT equal "over 3 yrs".

If you're going to quote facts, it helps to get them vaguely right.

As I've said umpteen times before on here, Simon Thompson has been extolling the virtues of TEK for many years now.

During which time, the share price has moved pretty much only in one direction. Down.

I guess by the law of averages, he'll eventually get it right. But that doesn't make any of his previous buy tips at much higher price levels any better.

Dogofashare - even that selective track record you use isn’t exactly great. And it means little to any longer term holders (probably the majority on here).

So I’ll still stick to my facts thanks & you can stick to yours.

Pedro61 - it's what the company SHOULD be about. But sadly, not what it's ACTUALLY about as we speak.

Gross-Lee-Misleading has been banging on about special dividends & "creating valuable companies from investing in university technologies that can improve people's lives" for years. Meanwhile - with the odd fleeting exception - investors have seen Tek's share price go from bad to worse. Down almost 36% over 5 years & 13% over the last 12 months.

But never mind, he can just drop the odd name into Tek's results RNS - like Warren Buffett (whose name he misspells) and Dr. Benjamin Franklin - and all will be well.

Long & the short of it is, no-one knows whether IMM's genuinely on the cusp of a deal.

Or if Tim's just leading us on a merry dance (wouldn't be the first time).

No real point in speculating which is right. Only thing we've got to go on is Tim's track record, which ain't great to put it mildly.

But I remain a holder, as there's always the hope Tigtig will leap back onboard the Starship Enterprise and take us all off to the moon.

And if not, it's worth sticking around just for the comedy gold value.

Spantrout - yes, but INC’s alternative deal announced in that same RNS bears no relation to the original IMHO.

Regardless of Tim’s attempts to spin it, it’s really just a knee-jerk reaction to a stock overhang problem, rather than a long term strategic move.

INC’s share price ranged from 20-30p when the Marionnaud deal looked on and their promo was about to launch. Then along came the patent infringement case (allegedly fully settled in INC’s favour) & news that the Marionnaud deal had collapsed & INC’s share price promptly tanked to 4-6p. Tells you all you need to know about this alternative deal (& how worthless IMM’s warrants in INC have become within such a short time).

I really wouldn’t waste any more time on Tom W’s personal rants.

He strikes me as someone who hides his own shortcomings by calling everyone else out, making controversial statements just to stay in the limelight & constantly changing his mind..

Hmmm, wonder who else that brings to mind….

Spantrout - “Lack of rns suggests nothing changed.”

I wouldn’t be so sure.

Look what happened at Incanthera (another Tim special).

No mention - for months - of Marionnaud (their exclusive new sales partner) dropping out, after a patent infringement case was allegedly firmly settled in INC’s favour.

Then suddenly it’s RNS’d that Marionnaud are no longer involved after all. And INC’s share price duly tanks still further.

That info too was clearly market-sensitive. Yet it wasn’t formally confirmed for months.

TotalWealth - I’m not sure whether the explanation you attached applies in this case.

Or whether it relates to a UK-based company that decides to list on the US rather than the UK market?

Spantrout - you’re after £500m to sell your IMM shares? That’s SOME holding you’ve amassed.

Forget the exotic holiday. Just buy a tropical island 🌴.

Oh, and don’t let Tim’s private jet land there. Just give him the nudgy nudgy.

Who cares what Tom W advises.

Investors need minds of their own - & Tom’s is about the last I’d consult.

Mol - so you did. In fact you said “would be silly not to extend tick tock to at least 30 June 2025 and possibly beyond (never mind any sweetbiotix news......)”.

Our resident researcher lives on then. Which is no bad thing. Though it can sometimes be hard to keep up….

Monteacute - it’s certainly preferable if posters on any BB are actually invested. I suspect many aren’t, both here & elsewhere.

But I wouldn’t say it was necessary to view averaging down as your “subscription to be allowed to contribute to the BB.”

I bought into IMM in a relatively small way before the first P3 trial & again a few years later when there seemed to be a few glimmers of hope, despite the initial trial failing to meet any endpoints.

Since then though, I’ve concluded IMM’s management is way more concerned about their own welfare than shareholders’. I’ve also learned - the hard way - that Tim’s career is littered with promises that never get delivered and companies that fall by the wayside, including some that have collapsed completely.

There is still a faint glimmer of hope here in my opinion, but I see the odds as heavily stacked against us now. The only reason I continue to hold is that faint glimmer. Plus the fact the value of my holding has been eroded to such an extent, it’s hardly worth selling any more.

That conclusion persuaded me not to throw any more good money after bad. And I certainly don’t regard myself being less entitled to voice my opinions about IMM or Tim as a result. If anything, quite the opposite in fact.

Mol42 - wasn’t tock set for Dec 24?

Did someone just move the clock forward six months without saying?

Spantrout - not sure what you were on about when you posted "Lordloads looked into this one last night and took a punt this morning".

For the record, I'm already invested here and have neither added or sold for months.