Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
To resolve the Incathera debate once & for all:
IMM owns c. 10%, so at Incanthera's current market cap of around £10.5m, IMM's stake is worth £1.05m.
IMM's current market cap is c. £8.65m and its share price is trading at around 2.1p.
So theoretically, Incanthera is worth 1.05/8.65 x 2.1p to IMM. Which equates to 0.255p per share.
In other words, Wigwammer was far closer to being right on this than oldbutnowisa.
Still, even 0.255p a share's worth having when you're currently only trading at 2.1p.
Mol42 - same with Google Chrome just now - optiobiotix.com is STILL down. Anyone know who to notify about this?:
This site can’t be reached
optibiotix.com took too long to respond.
Running Windows Network Diagnostics
ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT
DorsetLSE - I totally agree with you about chartists & so-called experts.
About a decade ago, I recall many experts saying the US markets were over-valued & due a major correction. At that time, I had a decent chunk of my pension pot in European equities, going nowhere fast. Despite the prevalent “expert” advice, I decided to move from a European to a US fund. And boy am I glad I did.
Many experts are again saying the US is over-valued today. And they could be right eventually. But in the long term, I fully expect them to be wrong again. Most non-US markets are heavily influenced by American sentiment anyway. So if the US falls, Europe & the UK are almost bound to follow suit.
Let’s hope if there is any US downturn, it’s fairly short-lived & shallow, as SMT has a heavy geographic concentration there. I suspect the Fed will still reduce interest rates later this year or early next, which should help.
As for SMT “going nowhere for too long”, I know what you mean as it has seemed rangebound for some time now. It almost feels like a case of one step forwards, two back. But if you look at the share chart, that’s not entirely fair. It has actually gone up 37% over the past 12 months, albeit from a low base.
CaptLard - I think you'll find the answer in my previous post.
Unless you reckon its summary of SMT's figures is accurate:
Annual Sales, $-2,913 M, Annual Income, $-2,922 M
Ripley94 - not sure how reliable some of that data is.
For example, it says:
Annual Sales, $-2,913 M
Annual Income, $-2,922 M
What's that about?!
Wigwammer & Supermobileman - I’m not wasting any more time on you, as you clearly both have a problem understanding basic nuances of English.
Main thing is Goldgirl - and her repeated - yes repeated - totally unsubstantiated claims has vanished for now.
And if she re-emerges spouting further nonsense, you’ll be pleased to hear I’ll be back to dispel the myths.
Sure, but that’s a totally different issue from how much pay he’s awarded or awards himself.
Supermobileman - I was hoping not to have to spell everything out. But it seems I do - for you at least.
Had you bothered reading my previous post, you'd have seen what I actually wrote was:
'I've no idea where the share price is heading. Nor does anyone else. My GUESS is that at some stage once the next Lupuzor trial is well underway (assuming this happens), the price will be significantly higher than now.... But despite your claims, I don't "damn well know where this shares will be heading from where it is now."'
As for GoldGirl, I never said everything she wrote was fiction. But that she repeatedly presented personal opinions as though they were firm facts, with nothing to back up her arguments.
I'm sorry if you still can't understand what I'm saying, but I really couldn't make things any clearer.
As for your rather childish insult, grow up.
Cm22 - do you mean by association?
I can't see how else it would be "good for Guident", unless you're privy to some partnership news which has passed the rest of us by.
Supermobileman - it would be sad if it were true. But it's not, so it isn't.
I've no idea where the share price is heading. Nor does anyone else. My GUESS is that at some stage once the next Lupuzor trial is well underway (assuming this happens), the price will be significant;y higher than now. That's why I've held on to my shares - the second & final batch of which was bought almost 2 years ago.
But despite your claims, I don't "damn well know where this shares will be heading from where it is now" and I most CERTAINLY| don't "damn well know GoldGirl was making valid truthful statements". As she wasn't - she was just expressing her own personal opinion with no facts to back it up.
Aspex - totally agree about TW. SOH should never have gone near him. And I'm very surprised he ever did.
Not sure about SOH's paycheque. It certainly looks disproportionate so far, given where we are and how long it's taken us to get there. But Sweetbiotix might yet be a game changer, which would then cast SOH's remuneration in a very different light.
However, you could still argue that UNLESS/UNTIL that happens, more restraint should have been exercised.
“a dogmatic old bore” - but enough about you wigwammer.
Presumably precisely BECAUSE I called her out.
Sticks & stones wigwammer.
Wigwammer - my posts here normally get one or two recommends. Goldgirl's generally get none.
I'll let others draw their own conclusions from that.
Wigwammer - I presume you filtered Goldgirl then, since you say: “I have seen boards where the ramping is out of control….But I see almost no evidence of that here.”
Perhaps I should’ve gone to Specsavers, but despite following TEK & LUCY as a holder in the former, I couldn’t tell (or care frankly) what make of glasses Micah was wearing.
Net impact on Lucyd’s sales? Oooh, I’d say a figure about as round as his lenses.
Goldgirl - it’s not really about falling out or making up. The majority of people (other than “reality” TV contestants) mostly leave that sort of stuff behind as grown ups.
If you’re happy to stick to facts - rather than presenting opinions as nailed on outcomes - then I’ll be only too pleased to agree with you in future. If not, I’ll continue to call it out, so no-one risks being misled. Your call.
Notwithstanding any real/perceived S&P correlation, whether you buy, sell or hold is IMHO likely to be influenced by your timeframe more than anything.
Timing the markets consistently is notoriously hard.
I’d also question whether SMT has much correlation to any index, given its near 30% unlisted holdings. That’s kind of been its nemesis over the past 2-3 years!
Any CEO feeling the need to talk his own share up is a major red flag in my book.
I’m not saying IMM won’t go higher. As a holder, I sincerely hope it will. But that’s not because of any faith I’ve got in either Tim.