Member Info for lordloadsoflolly

Span - hope Charles Archer is wrong with his H2 2026 buyout prediction. Methinks that'd be way too early for Hex to have demonstrated its full value potential.

BTW - & off topic - assuming those INC SKIN + CELL prices are right, they look like an out & out bargain. Put me down for a dozen face serums & eye creams please!

Troajan - hard to know whether that 250,000 share trade was a buy or a sell, as slap bang in the middle of the spread.

Cauldstream7 - no idea what that last post of yours even meant.

You carry on wearing those rose-tinted spectacles and we'll see who's right.

Cauld - you're right, I don't have scientific knowledge in this area.

I do, however, have investment knowledge which is ultimately more important - assuming you actually want to make money.

Asking scientists whether the drugs they discovered will be successful and when they're likely to be commercialised is a bit like asking a parent whether their child will flourish. You're hardly likely to get an objective answer.

3LB - I'll drink to that!

Couerdelion - same here. The board's barely readable any more. Sea of green!

Never mind, I already know what I think about TEK. And until Gross changes tack (or is booted), I'm unlikely to change my tune.

As for Simon Thompson and his great IC tips. Nuff said.

Rebarm - very generous of you to invite me to your party. Particularly after everything I've posted!

Maybe let's just wait & see how things turn out here first. I sense there may not be cause for celebration any time soon, but here's hoping.

3LB - agreed on timing. Whether “30p will be blown away” short term largely depends on Inez flow test results I imagine.

Signs are promising, but as 25th July RNS stated “log correlation does not guarantee similar test outcomes”.

So by all means, Champagne at the ready. But don’t pop that cork just yet!

Nano - interesting link - thanks!

Not sure you can quite say Hex has “BOD keen to secure first-mover status in Montana”, when Avanti Helium has apparently pipped them to the post with this Montana offtake agreement.

But I presume you’re referring to production rather than sales first mover advantage?

Rebarm - problem attending the next AGM is that the value of our shareholdings has been reduced to little more than the train fare.

So even with a coffee freebie thrown in, I’ll give it a miss, thanks all the same.

Guys, as I said before, if there's someone here you've no time for, just filter them.

Rather than resorting to constant name-calling, which just serves as oxygen and clogs up the board.

We've - mostly - got the same interests at heart. So let's respect differing opinions, but filter any we find constantly irritating (mine included if you like!)

Wildbunch - a single private shareholder's vote is unlikely to make much difference to ANY outcome. Though collectively they can have a huge impact.

It's obviously your prerogative, but seems bizarre to me that you're apparently so reluctant to reveal HOW you voted. More interested in giving us details on the AGM refreshment arrangements (or lack thereof, by the sound of it).

Brentw1 - as far as I can see from reported trades on the London Stock Exchange, there have been three 50,000 deals so far today.

And the prices struck were:

26.26p @ 09.20.43

26.80p @ 10.20.16

26.41p @ 10.58.39

I don't think you can read too much into the above. The 26.8p trade definitely looks like a Buy, the other two might be Sells. But we're only talking trades of around £13k each time anyway, which IMHO isn't hugely significant in the scheme of things.

Thanks Leas & Scrodingerscat - I'm not really trying to influence Pokerchips BTW. He/she can do what they want.

I'm more trying to show any potential new investors how misleading Poker's posts really are. And that they're best ignored.

Beesty69 - seconded.

I've generally found the numpties only arrive in force once a share has crashed. You then get a never-ending battle of words between those who write the company off and those who see it miraculously rising from the ashes, phoenix-like.

Usually, in my experience (and yes, I've bought quite a few duffers in my time!), the recovery never comes and the optimists eventually disappear into the night when it becomes evident no recovery is ever happening.

Pokerchips - your post illustrates precisely why Tim's words must never be taken literally.

That Feb 25 RNS you mention stated the company's 2021 reorganisation "resulted in a much lower level of fixed overheads".

It hasn't. Quite the opposite in fact. Admin expenses in the latest Interims were £0.4 million, UP 33% from £0.3 million in 2024.

The same RNS stated: "Additional funding .... will strengthen the Company's negotiating position in ongoing licensing negotiations....Being able to apply this new funding to the P140 program will deliver quicker results and be a major contributor to regular positive news flow and program updates which will have a major impact to drive a positive upward movement in the share price, thereby increasing value for all shareholders".

It hasn't. Again, quite the opposite in fact. There have been NO results in its licensing negotiations so far, there has been NO regular news flow (let alone positive) and there has been NO positive upward movement in the share price. Indeed, the closing SP on the date of this RNS was 3.8p. It currently stands 58% LOWER at 1.6p.

This is NOT misleading nonsense. It is HARD FACT. Look up their 13th February RNS yourself if you need any further evidence.

Xviolet - nobody’s getting hysterical or antsy. They’re just pointing out that a) the SP is currently a fraction of its 2025 peak, b) none of what Tim predicted at the start of the year has materialised so far and c) two 2025 cash raises have already been needed to keep the lights on, despite Tim saying none was necessary.

If you’re happy with that as an investor, then fine.

Most PIs, however, like to at least preserve their capital. And the majority actually want to see some sort of positive return.

Nano - yup, all positive-looking stuff,

Not sure I follow your “ 2.4m shares traded (8 x market size!)” bit though?

What are you meaning by market size? (Helix has just over 186m shares in issue).

Pebsi - so they're not prepared to answer your questions in writing.

But if you give them a call, they'll tell you over the phone (nudgy nudgy)?

Well that sounds perfectly above board to me. No dodgy market insider practice whatsoever.

Honestly, you expect us to believe this kwap?

SashaCh & lincoln82 - I did briefly look into mendell (MDH.PL).

From memory, they've been talking about exercising that option to acquire M3 Helium for over a year now, extending the "expiry" date by a few months each time the previous "deadline" expires.

As for moving onto AIM, no certainty there either. A more expensive option for a micro company with a very low market cap.

But undoubtedly the right way to go. Aquis is a joke. Ridiculous spreads & terrible liquidity = near zero daily trades.