RE: first target5 Mar 2020 14:31
The problem with big outfits like BP is the 5-year plan. With the drill breaking down, they had to get off the ice before the thaw, so had no time for a second attempt.
Let's hope we have no mechanical issues (always a risk), but on the plus side, we have 3D seismic data (not invented when BP was there) - we also have the combined know-how of our own Directors and Consultants, Bex and PMO experts, plus of course the data from BP themselves, as well as similar plays from our neighbours (everybody needs good neighbours).
I would not be surprised to find out that they will want to drill down into the HRZ themselves, should our results at that depth turn out to be juicy.
Yes, we are in a different world to the days when BP assembled their rig on site, having transported in via pack horses - with a long set-up time, it meant the drilling window would have been shorter - that coupled with the 5-year plan, which meant they could not reschedule within the next few years would have meant it went on the back burner, and never came off it.
Let's forget about BP's experience, this is NOW - no comparison !