RE: Buyout21 Apr 2020 14:55
That's how I see it Mhawk, they would not only have had to find 60% of further proving costs, but would have needed to appoint a management team and travel expenses, at a time when they need to cut staff and overheads. They either had to go large or pull out. The Oil and Covid situations took away the option to sit things out for 3 months, time constraints forced their hand to make a decision right away. They did us no favours in pulling out so quickly, but the silver lining is that we have reposessed the land, and can sell it again. Next time we do a deal on Area A, it will be further derisked by the data. Yes, we have less bananas, but those targets which have not been eliminated will be better understood, better quantified, and further optimised. The big question is whether to stay in Area A, or to go to the middle faiway (B) which if proven will give us a shorter route by which to return to the Western fairway (A). Beyond that is the ever present question of funding - will PMO resolve their present predicament and return for Round2, or do we look for a new partner? We could divert some attention to Yukon if it had long term benefits. Time will tell, not long to wait.