Member Info for lbjj

Not a BEM shareholder. Irrelevant. Consequently I am utterly objective.
Drivel. How dare you attempt censorship for the umpteenth time. My view is being steadfastly supported by the facts.No license. So please explain the term drivel in this context?
Whatever your own shareholding has no bearing on the ultimate outcome of this saga, so why do you keep quoting it?
Do I have to possess a motive? Certainly not, except I will continue to call it as I see it.
I am still waiting for a single post with a compelling argument , backed by reliable evidence, supporting a view contrary to my own.
Your crude attempts at censorship are ridiculous. Back up your wishful thinking with something meaningful, or say nothing.

The lack of response from the swedes is exactly what the authorities want to see.
The more comatose and moribund the company and it’s investors show themselves to be, the easier the end game will be realised.
Investors there and here have already surrendered or abandoned their critical faculties.
Kallak for the swedes.

None whatsoever.
I imagine there is not a single investor, here or in Sweden, who holds shares in BEM as a result of the Finnish activity.

Your posts today beggar belief. You have become an apologist for swedish incompetence.

Yep. Irrelevant.
Trying to censor good sense for no reason.
Do you imagine Arsenal season ticket holder's never express an opinion on Spurs. Get real.
Engage in a real debate if you have a worthwhile comment...

So what? Irrelevant.

If the law is enough, why have you been so preoccupied of late with the polls?
And, if the law is enough, why are we waiting for a political election. I think you are overwhelmed by wishful thinking and clinging onto any administrative change which might just break the log jam.
In my opinion, it won't.

The political makeup of the government is of no importance. in my opinion, Eric.

FFS!
my 12.32 post - simple question.
Have you started early on the vino?

Are you deliberately being evasive. That is not answering the question.
That is just being overexcited for no reason...
Try again.

...and you’re not going to answer it, are you?

I see you chose not to answer my simple question?

And while your excitement mounts, so does your paper loss.

I lost some money here, which I have recouped elsewhere many times over, plus a couple of nice property deals. I don't mind losing money, but I will not sit and watch, what you call a paper loss, paralyse me.

Simple question, Suzy. in 64 months of pointless waiting, why do you think the swedes have not once made any commitment to their own process and stated a timescale for a decision?

Your response proves my point very nicely.
You have no basis for your optimism and excitement, do you?

Good morning,
for anything to happen here, Aladdin might well need to get involved!
what I would really like to see, other than the license, is someone, anyone, to make a compelling investment argument for BEM right now.
The posters who shout me down for not believing never seem to be able to give me compelling, credible facts and evidence to point towards the Swedes changing tack?
How could it happen?
What could make it happen?
Who could make it happen?
When will it happen?
Wishful thinking just doesn't do it for me in the face of 64 months of utter rubbish and a subsiding SP, endless dilution etc etc.

10p represents an increase of 112.7%, or comfortably more than double the current price.
Does that not constit7te a relate?

Your question is invalid.
I do not hate this share or anyone invested.
I do not enjoy the fact, and it is a fact, that the swedes have trashed the company and it’s investors. I would have thought that was obvious from my previous posts.
I also represent the opposite view from those who blindly believe, without evidence, that this is about to come good.
It is not time wasted if it prevents one person investing unwisely in a lost cause.
People are still blinded by the rise to 75p a propos of nothing.
Even in the unlikely event of the concession being granted, this will struggle to make 10p, in my opinion. The damage is done, and the opportunity gone.
Anyone can post on any board. There are no membership criteria.
You are, more than most, keen to censor and belittle anyone not sharing your view.
Why not start your own chat room where you can limit input to those who mirror precisely your views.
I base my views on evidence. Coming up to five and a half years of bs, dishonesty and the swedes pretending to honour the process. They have no intention of granting the prize to a foreign company.
If the Swedish 59% were held by institutions with political lobbying clout, they might think differently. No government anywhere in the world takes notice of a bunch of private investors with no influence or ability to hurt the political machine.
Now stop trying to censor opinion, just because you happen to disagree.

You have made it everyone's business by wittering on about what is important to you. Thete is only one mstter of importance, and that is the truth in this situation. Which is that the swede's will not grant BEM the license. Nobody can make them, either.

Your 20.43 post is a jumble of contradictions masquerading as justification of your investment and assertions about swedish politics which are way off the mark. Get a grip of reality. There is more chance of a Disneyworld being built in Dewsbury than a mine at Kallak whilst BEM hold the exploration license.

And a very good evening to you...