Member Info for kylie75

Do you understand basic maths BV? Share price trading 6.2p this morning, 10% lower on the day and new low for this move. You complete 12yr old moron, all the valueless hot air you vent, the share price is falling. Looks like your amateur hour view as to how this plays out is wrong. New lows coming, dilution coming, only management will be protected here.

BV, don’t waste your time. You’re new here and clearly very very inexperienced in terms of this company. They’ve been pedalling that bs for about 15yrs, look at the sp. It never materialises. Watch and learn…..

Interesting to see how soon the dilution comes. How much are they going to pretend they really did need the consolidation and share reorg as leverage or as we all know dilution was the intention all along

I did not say it was a major risk, Dixie or SOU did. The very fact it’s even mentioned all over RNSs and his message smells off to me.

Dixie, why is a sanctioned SH with 2m shares worth £14k seen as a strategic risk to the company, en par with phase 2 funding and project execution??!! I don’t get it. Explain? Have SOU made another boo boo?

Looks like the GM really helped breathe some life into this old dying dog. Volume traded this afternoon was HUGE! Woof woof.

SB, i know exactly what the main purpose of the meeting is. Twat.

No you don't, they are for investors current & potential, gobby moron. otherwise i would not have been able to attend some in past few years. DYOR.

Anyone know if there’s an investor presentation today updating on the key corporate strategy, I.e. the Sound Exec Team Remuneration Plan? Is there a dial in?

You write like you had a very bad head injury when you were younger BV. Assuming so, I’m sorry to hear that.

Me a muppet? What a clueless moon you are. There’s a medical condition that explains you’re issues BV, someone on here can probably diagnose it.

You call it waffle BV, but anyone that's vaguely sane and not underwater would call it fact / reasoning (for the sp being at record lows). the fact you don't get that is fully understandable and not at all surprising to me.

Great post as usual BV, not. noticed you've ignored all requests for any responses to actual factual challenges to your logic and questioning your sister's AI generated youtube garbage you recently shared. yes there are always buyers and sellers when ever you get a trade. there were buyers of SOU shares are 85p, 60p, 40p, 20p, 4p, 2p and 1p, but they were all wrong to buy. Just look at the trend and the volume. It speaks volumes about the ineffective and corrupt BoD here and the Exec team's inability to return any value to SHs on the money they invested. Instead the mgt team ensure they get a very high return via their unjustifiable packages. Take John Argent for example. Think about what his role is, his experience. SOU have not drilled a hole in the ground for over 3300 days. WTF has this guy been doing for 90% of those days since? What value is he adding? What value has he added. He must be a Tetris & Sudoku expert, that's all I can say because there is less that zero evidence of him adding any value to SHs here. Don't get me started on the rest of the leaches here.

It’s a shame, those sellers clearly hadn’t watched BV / Graham's joint marketing video on the importance of Tendrara to Morocco….

Ed, i fear the company are hoping for a low or no turn out. Save money on fizzy water and peanuts and keep the pot as high as possible for the next management rip off / pay round.

Hilarious BV, did your sister make that? It AI bs. Not one thing in there is factual. Apparently Phase 2 is progressing well and ahead of schedule!! Looks like something the SOU team came up with, same level of accuracy as their regular updates! Great mid-afternoon chuckle, thanks.

For those of a certain age, you might recall a rather distressing scene in the timeless Tarantino movie, Pulp Fiction, when a rather unfortunate Marcellus Wallis (played by the legend Ving Rhames) stumbles into a store owned by Zed. Without getting to graphic, Zed takes advantage of an incapacitated Marcellus and it all ends up with Marcellus bent over a table getting Zed's love. This is a great movie analogy (yet again) for shareholders in SOU (Marcellus) and the lying self interested and incompetent management team here (Zed) and the upcoming weeks. The vote is 'rigged' and pre-arranged by the management team. They don't care and don't need PI consent - they will have already got the main non-PI SHs (ONYHM and Aficagas) onside, and merely paying lip service by getting PIs to vote. It's a nailed on agreement for the share consolidation, followed swiftly by a surprise surprise dilution.

Your post really just underlines what a clueless f wit you are Soundboy. have you understood the cashflow impact from Phase 1 when it likely possibly starts up in 2027-2028? it barely covers G&A. so nothing for investment, nothing for funding any other existing projects / hobbies (such as hydrogen & helium and solar hunting) and nothing for SHs. look at the latest broker report, they've done all the hard work for you, moron. As for helium - are you really as clueless a troll as you seem, as BV is? That is 15-20yrs away from even under the most dope'd up optimistic scenario being even contemplated, let alone generating revenue. it's just another shiny golden ticket this management team and BoD are using to distract the vast number of equally ill informed and stupid other PIs here from the reality - this company is just a vehicle for corrupt, lying and incompetent management to get paid. Nothing else. That's really all that should be in the quarterly updates they provide, not 10yr old recycled 'Dreams in the Desert' shyte from JP's era. Dilution coming soon, I'll be right again on that.

Looks like a big background sell order being worked. guess the market is waking up to the likely next step (based on his well documented approach at previous company) of the latest used car salesman to take the 'CEO' position at this floundering company. dilution coming. another stab in the dark by another AIM chancer all the existing SH expense and risk. Mind you, with such an incompetent BoD here, who deemed it justifiable to pay Graham £700k gbp for delivering negative SH value and despite the fact it would drain available cash for the company to the extent they would need to do another equity dilution, nothing is a surprise any more.

You turn up when the SP is under pressure - so you mean 95% of the time? Yes, that’s correct. Anything relevant or if value to add Smuggler?