Member Info for KNIGELK

You changed your tune fast - just 2/3 weeks ago you were "happy" with the results and the outlook/direction given by the company within the report ... now it's a shambolic business! Make your mind up please...

Hi, hope you are ok? NTBR has been a classic recovery share - debt was a BIG issue several years ago but no longer - still upside here imo gl

Did you post here a while back as if you were a shareholder up to a month ago I would have expected to have seem posts? When post now after selling out...? BTW TLY obviously is a "classic" AIM share in regards to requiring funding via placings - but it is definitely not near the front of the queue is it? PTV... MTV... PHRM... etc etc are far worse re placings... and at least this company has a product and revenue unlike some dodgy oil AIM shares or cash shells etc etc

Maybe Trv123 has been buying because the volume is good today and the share price up 10% :-)

Sorry for being flippant - probably due to a sore head and apologies for cross message - i thought you meant another sell here.... anyway i hope QPP is relisted soon (if the company is connected to your user name) as what with AFR and WRN to name another two - AIM has a bad rep at the moment and finding decent investments is getting harder and harder imo gl

Yes AIM is dire - some companies are even suspended... aren;t they Quindell?

Hopefully the share price will not reach the level were you might invest :-) there are far worse AIM shares out there but i don't really see you posting on NEW - SER etc. My point is that you s/b posting 24/7 on probably 100 different threads if you really think AIM is dire - yet it's only a handful. GL whether you decide to invest... as even "safe" shares like Tesco haven't been great recently

I would think they might just be able to reach 300 patients lol... good comment... Trv123 - all I will say is that a bulk of your July posts have been on PREM and PTV and I doubt you have ever held either share - I know some disapprove of AIM but why can't you just let us get on with trading these higher risk shares if we wish to? I think 90% of us acknowledge the risks involved and do not need the thought police giving us the occasional warning of the potential risks - perhaps you rather we just stick our cash under our beds?

Actually Paris70 gaved a valid answer and did not say he was offended - its seems to be you that's offended for some reason... and lets be honest - I have been picked up by some posters a number of times on my posts - here and often quoted for posts on other threads or even other websites! I just repeat - for the last time - I was simply just puzzled as to why Totally was the first ever post - but that's the end of the matter.. more importantly - were has King75 disappeared to???........

I really don' need to take lessons from you - the king of non holding posters across the AIM market but then again it is SO easy to post on shares near their lows and so easy to disappear when/if they go back up - be good to see some posters on LSE actually post on their own xxxx holdings!!!

I still personally cannot get round my head why anyone would post on a small AIM company without either a) being a shareholder b) being an ex-shareholder c) being someone interested in the sector d) thinking of investing e) thinking of shorting (not likely here) or f) being somehow linked either as a competitor or in the sector or perhaps against health coaching per se... sorry but to suddenly appear and the first ever post is on this share has to suggest one of a to f is valid... that's why it matters but of course anyone can post... even my mum if she was ever remotely interested in health coaching :-)

It's not about being hostile - it's about asking a simple question. The first ever post Paris70 makes on LSE is on a tiny small AIM company called Totally... it raised an eyebrow if nothing else...

Will all the bond holders be out of pocket too?

Are either of you invested here? The general election put on hold various contracts within the NHS for virtually all private companies - it's out of the way now.. also please factor in their varioius new avenues - charities/B2B - it's not just about CCGs and small health coaching contracts - let's just see what happens over the next six months but imo the interims were the most bullish in outlook to date and now the BoD have to meet expectations going forward...

Just seen the RNS - seems like shareholders being stuffed again with at least part of the company continuing in some form or another... it's time shareholders were put at the front of the queue - not the back...

Maybe I should make my comments clearer - a fault I acknowledge. I was simply saying that you have now slightly changed your position/view point here in light of the results but suddenly a new poster appears who has a bearish view - which is fine. Not saying there is any connection. It wouldn't surprise me if the poster had a different account a while back but obviously just an thought and I might be totally barking up the wrong tree as we both know 1-2 posters no longer post here... but in future when I talk about one poster I will not drag another poster into the conversation - lesson learn gl

No worries - and don't get me wrong, we all have to start from day one and make our first post... just surprised it was on Totally but keep watching as potential is still here..

It's good to look at the numbers to make sure they add up and I'll review but this is your FIRST ever post on LSE... so who were you previously? Why post on Totally? Were have you been all this time while "watching" the company... sorry but i take your points - but with a pinch of salt considering you have no track record here - at least Get_Rich_Quick has been here two plus years and always had a bearish opinion UP TO NOW... strange how one poster is now willing to give the company a chance in view of the results a new bear appears...

Welcome back and I think this is your most positive post to date - on Advfn some say the "carrot" of significant warrants/options if certain targets are met might be motivating the management more to push the company forward. It's the balance between rewarding directors and ensuring shareholders benefit too that have been a sore point with some AIM companies - we just have to wait now to see if all these plans bear fruit but agree there's now more understanding of what we s/b aiming for... understand if you wish to post less often as sometimes we have to realise that rarely does anything posted online make any difference - and sometimes less is more gl

Hope you are ok? It's not like you to spend so long off line... unless you have sold on the recent spike? Best wishes whether you are still invested or not as although I disagree with a fair portion of your comments - no one can disagree that an alternative view is healthy gl