Member Info for Kenirogas

This was never going to be a quick or clean fight if both parties are out for everything

Gla

Timster, yes, i believe so, and posted on SP site apparently

Oh Yes You Could!

LMOA

Ownership of asset..

Which is probably why the Majors are still in the wings, no?

Surely it has to be reported as it will have some dilutory effect, therefore price sensitive?

Whether it is deemed a good or bad response may determine today/Monday publication imo

Sell in May...

Didnt we get computers and easy market access a couple of years ago?

;-)

Puddy,

I suspect Hope (and partners) will be more concerned to be so much more in the public eye now that things are in Cali.

Although ZM and SN could have underwritten the financing of our lawyers should FrR be unable to pay, I doubt such a "rising star" would take on a case that he believed had less than a 70% chance of succes at this stage of his career.

Hang in there, but as Prod said, plan for the worst...

Impatiently.

Given the lack of immediate TRO, I have some concerns that the Cali Courts do not see the two cases as being intrinsically linked which was, I believe, one of FRRs main drives in thee Caymans action?

Back to wait and see...but at least we now CAN see, for better or worse.

The paper read to me that Maples (Hopes lawyers) could unilateralt appoint a receiver unless that TRO gets pit in place.

Mitigating this is the fact that the court seems to have pushed for an OOC at the first submission.

Bwtfdik...no legal eagle. Be nice to get Oopsi's take

Thanks again Wham and Daniel.

Agree with Chileone. Defo looks like Hope is playing for the lot at this stage.

Lets hope the court acts promptle on a TRO following this...

.

With respect Roy, i dont recall you sharing anyone's enthusiam for the entire time you've been invested, but GL anyway...

Very well said Bomber..

While there have been some glaring omission in info, I very much doubt any of us could do what our BOD is trying to do...

Total magic..

Nothing to do with the two big buys that went through last night, Oh No....

Bet there are no more today, either ;-)

I would guess those two are intrinsically linked TB:

Ie.: We'll give you the loan IF OmF guarantee pre sign a withdrawal deal.

As of now, we dont know that such a settlement offer has been made to my knowledge?

Option 3 please!

Dont disagree that the MFD tie up is one of sevaral option, but I did disagree with your definitive..

"Therefore the K&S fields cannot be the 2 GTW projects MFDevCo mentioned just as TM and OSX3 were never the Brazil deal"

As yet, there is no actual evidence to support this statement either....

DNO not DHN

I read Mms post the other way...

as in there remains a strong likelihood of tie in between MFD and DHN over S&K

"A G2W option using the Schooner platform would IMO be very appealing to DNO as they would have a saleable asset instead of a big liability. "

No?

Why so negative Reg? ;-)

A rational view of the current situation given the info we have available, imo.

Well done that man!