Member Info for Kenirogas

IB...beautifully explained thx.

Tim, I would suggest discovery will come of the back of the above submission?

Fingers crossed....

Dated 7th July...

Which year is this from Taiz? ;-)

Sorry AJ, am I misundertanding? All bar one site are NOT in block 12?

Is there a definite link to FRR here? what's to say BP arent getting into bed with, say, BLoE?

Apols if I'm missing something obvious..and thanks to all of our resident sleuths..

But who is making you see things you don't wanna see?....Just who IS out Green Manalishi?

Hoping for a little Black Magic somewhere along the line here...

Looking at spread and timings Id say it was a Bed & Isa....possibly a rollover, but not so sure how those work...

From roberryroy on sav board. This may have nothing to do with us, astersik highlighted bit is my own emphasis, but could that be what Hope wishes to fall back on?
Begins.....
Not true trek.

Golden eagle was set up to get oil leases in Alaska from NordAq when NordAq defaulted on repayments of a loan AK and Lothian made to it while Devine was in charge. Despite NordAq (Devine) raising further funds Via a farm in for NordAq.

When Devine left NordAq the new owners of NordAq wanted the leases back. You can see there was lawsuits between AK and Lothian Vs NordAq. I was mentioning it on this board at the time, and I believe the lawsuits was subsequently completed in private.

*****The link I posted yesterday showed that golden eagle (AK) has passed the licences back to nordaq but kept a 1.5% royalty. *****
This seems to indicate That AK has had to transfer ownership back to Nordaq for whatever reason. This happened on Oct 18, so I expect will show up in the accounts for GE over the next year or so.

I don’t have facts, I don’t think many people will have bit it’s all a bit murky. I did hear a rumour, unsubstianted and I believe it was alleged in the court documents that the ex ceo of nordaq (Devine), subsequently went to work for Lothian (of whom AK is the 100% owner of holding all the shares today I believe) which, if true raises a question as to why he would be in favour with Lothian and AK having lost money to a deal with Nordaq. They did get some oil leases next to a rumoured 5billion barrel oil discovery though.....

I don’t expect this post to be up for long. (Robroy)...ends

but i have a copy if it does get removed from both boards

"surely a creditor can only realise assets totalling the debt amount not something approaching billions"

Surely Hope will be starting a firesale, fractions of a cent on the dollar, just enough to cover his percieved debt.

The sale would no doubt somehow end up with him/his cronies if allowed to go ahead

Personally not accepting the "is dead" scenario until the bitter, official end.

But not expecting a lot either....

Hope reigns eternal, eh?

From Nickers 1955 on ii, never come across this poster before, so take it as you will...

"Just like to add that I emailed Tim at YJ and asked the question ‘Can you tell me if Baker Hughes are still working for Frontera Resources in Georgia under their agreement?’ I can’t share the answer but I thought I could see a bit more light."

Isnt the scheduled hearing 6th June?

This is just our submission i think, to which Hope now has an extedned response time.

5p is, imo, totally correct and the whole shooting match is at risk now.

So an preliminary injuction is a nailed on, bona fide, take it to the bank no-brainer then Tim?

VGLA

More likely to be just our request for it at this stage, Arsenal?

Yesterday was our deadline for submitting an explanationa s to why an injunction is warranted

Sure it will be analysed to death shorthly!

Nail on the head, Bedex....

See you in another couple of weeks ;-)

Thats how I read it too,

...so rapid (/full) discovery is deemed more important to us than delaying Hope's defence filing?

Our team obviously believes there is something important to find but, as has already been said by many on here, we ain't got it yet.

Gla

Defendants requested the same extension they seek in this motion, which is a date that shall be fifteen (15) days after the Court issues a ruling on Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction.

So does this mean Hope has until 21st June to respond? (15 days after the hearing on the 6th)

... that would surely play in his favour, as he could continue with his current activities right up until the hearing, and obviously beyond if the hearing goes in his favour?

Or have I got it wrong?

From tonights doc...

Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order is denied.
The matter will be set for a hearing regarding whether a preliminary injunction should issue for June 6, 2019 at 1:30 p.m.
If Plaintiffs elect to file a supplemental brief explaining why a preliminary injunction is warranted, they may file a brief of no more than 20 pages by May 16, 2019.
Defendants may file an opposition brief of no more than 20 pages by May 23, 2019.
Plaintiffs may file an optional reply
Of no more than 10 pages by May 30th

I doubt any shorters would risk selling any more at this level if we come back Pyro...they'll be buying like crazy to close their positions...

When/ If.....

Atb

Sorry, that is Enegi have 100% again...

Dont we have 100% of the deep rogths again having let the G2 option lapse?

Rns 17/12 last year

And I'm guessing here Bugsy that Kaztrans didnt have the AC or US political links that we do?

I think the curremt situation with GG wanting to be at the bug bisiness table will ultimately work in our favour, one way or another...but nice to know there may be a backstop of sorts