RE: Gerry19 Aug 2018 13:15
No no no no no no the £200m npv is completely irrelevant it means absolutely nothing if you can’t get oil, gas, gold,,copper, lithium or whatever you may be trying to mine or work over out of the ground commercially, and it’s unarguable now that ast have not being able to make it work ..€43m spent to generate circa €1.8m a year in revenue..you do the math!!!! that’s why dozens of these fields with npv of £200- £1bn are given away all over the world for next to nothing because most of the time they can’t be made to work commercially. Also, because you’ve spent €43 it does not mean you’re entitled to get it back, it doesn’t work like that in any business whether on a gas field or on the high street. It’s not a loan that someone owes you and you can call on it’s a speculative investment by ast that they haven’t made work. The logical conclusion is ast shareholders will get shares in the acquiring company and that company will commit £30-40 in capex costs over the coming years to build the plant and try to develop the field so it at least washes its face.